Intellectual Property Law

HB Ad Slot
HB Mobile Ad Slot

Intellectual property applies to many different areas of the legal world. Applying for patents for work-products, by individual employees, trademark laws, copyrights, and how companies leverage their IP asset-rights over employees, are just a few of the many areas the National Law Review covers as it pertains to IP.

Intellectual Property Litigation

Intellectual Property disputes are a complex area of law, often involving deep dives into complex concepts to understand the issues at play. In the United States, the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO/PTO) is the agency involved in registering patents and trademarks.   As part of the USPTO, the Patent Trial and Appeal Board settles patent disputes, using a variety of mechanisms to settle issues related to intellectual property.    Some of the mechanisms include inter partes review, post-grant procedures, and covered business method patent reviews.  Issues related to the America Invents Act are also settled through the PTAB. The National Law Review covers changes to standards held by the USPTO in litigation and other patent issues.  The Trademark Trial and Appeal Board settles disputes related to trademarks, such as an ex parte appeal from the denial of an application for registration by an examining attorney, and an inter partes opposition, cancellation, concurrent use, or interference proceeding.  Other agencies involved in patent disputes are the International Trade Commission (ITC) or the Federal Trade Commission (FTC).  The National Law Review covers patent news as it relates to Supreme Court (SCOTUS) and federal circuit courts’ appeals, as well as general patent litigation and new patent filings.

Intellectual Property in Drug Patents

Legal analysis related to drug patents and pharmaceuticals and the interplay with intellectual property issues are also covered by the National Law Review.   Drug patents, biosimilars, generic top-level domain registration (gTLD), trade secrets, non-compete clauses, and other patent application news are updated on the site regularly. Additionally, tangential issues that impact pharmaceutical companies, such as innovator liability and related litigation, are also analyzed by the legal experts who write for the National Law Review. 

Intellectual Property in an Employment Context

The National Law Review has legal analysis on the intersection between intellectual property rights and employment, and who owns ideas, the Work Made For Hire principle as well resulting litigation. Additionally, legislation such as the Defense of Trade Secrets Act and its impact on workplaces, and ongoing litigation related to the legislation is also covered.

International Intellectual Property

Visitors to the site will oftentimes read about international news as it relates to patent applications in the US, and internationally as well. Pharmaceutical patents in Brazil, medical device patent applications from the United Kingdom, or litigation from the European Union, China, India, and other international sectors, are often covered online. Visitors will find the latest coverage, news, and insights on patent applications and litigation, when visiting the National Law Review, for up-to-date practice-area news.

National Law Review Intellectual Property/Patent Law TwitterFor hourly updates on the latest news about Intellectual Property Law, IP Litigation, Patent Legislation, and more, be sure to follow our IP Law Twitter feed, and sign up for complimentary e-news bulletins.

Recent Intellectual Property, Patent, Trademark & Copyright News

Title
Custom text Organization Sort descending
Dec
3
2014
Ricoh Americas Corporation and Xerox Corporation v. MPHJ Technology Investments, LLC, IPR2013-00302: Final Written Decision IPR2013-00302 Faegre Drinker
Dec
13
2014
Toyota Motor Corp. v. American Vehicular Sciences LLC: Final Written Decision IPR2013-00415 Faegre Drinker
Dec
19
2014
Apple Inc. v. Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute and Dynamic Advances, LLC, Denying Second Request for Rehearing IPR2014-00319 Faegre Drinker
Jan
18
2015
Opower Inc. v. Cleantech Business Solutions: Instituting Covered Business Method Review Faegre Drinker
Feb
19
2015
Samsung Electronics: Denying Joinder and Institution IPR2015-00118 re: Patent Litigation Faegre Drinker
Mar
16
2015
Microsoft Corp. v. IPR Licensing, Inc.: Granting Joinder and Instituting Inter Partes Review IPR2015-00074 Faegre Drinker
Mar
19
2015
Unified Patents Inc. v. Dragon Intellectual Property, LLC: Granting Motions to Seal IPR2014-01252 Faegre Drinker
Mar
26
2015
HTC Corporation and HTC America, Inc. v. Flashpoint Technology, Inc: Denying Request for Rehearing IPR2014-01249 Faegre Drinker
Mar
31
2015
The Brinkmann Corporation v. A&J Manufacturing: Decision on Institution IPR2015-00056 Faegre Drinker
Apr
15
2015
Valeo North America, Inc. v. Magna Electronics, Inc.: Granting Motion to Submit Supplemental Information IPR2014-01204 Faegre Drinker
May
1
2015
Hughes Network and Hughes Communications v. California Institute of Technology: Decision Denying Institution IPR2015-00060 Faegre Drinker
May
5
2015
Temporal Power v. Beacon Power: Denying Institution IPR2015-00147 Faegre Drinker
May
11
2015
Samsung Electronics v. Smartflash LLC: Denying Leave to File Motion to Compel Routine Discovery CBM2014-00190 Faegre Drinker
May
26
2015
Westlake Services v. Credit Acceptance Corp: Denying Request to File Motion to Compel Deposition CBM2014-00176 Faegre Drinker
Jun
9
2015
Bank of America v. Intellectual Ventures I: All Challenged Claims Found Ineligible in Final Written Decision CBM2014-00028 Faegre Drinker
Jun
29
2015
R.R. Street & Co v. Chemische Fabrik Kreussler: Decision Denying Institution Based Upon Limiting Claim Constructions IPR2015-00289 Faegre Drinker
Jul
8
2015
Merial Limited v. Virbac: Granting Request for Rehearing Because “Optional” Nature of Claimed Component Not Addressed Faegre Drinker
Jul
16
2015
Toshiba Corporation, et al. v. Intellectual Ventures I LLC, Final Written Decision IPR2014-00310 Faegre Drinker
Aug
6
2015
T. Rowe Price. v. Secure Axcess: Granting Institution of Challenged CBM Claims CBM2015-00027 Faegre Drinker
Aug
12
2015
Mercedes-Benz USA, LLC, Daimler North America Corporations, and Daimler AG v. Proximity Monitoring Innovations LLC: Indemnitor Is Not Necessarily Real Party-In-Interest Faegre Drinker
Aug
13
2015
Toshiba v. Intellectual Ventures II: Final Written Decision Finding All Challenged Claims Unpatentable IPR2014-00418 Faegre Drinker
Aug
17
2015
Valeo North America v. Magna Electronics: Granting Request for Rehearing Based on Board Overlooking Finding of No Unpatentability of Broader Claim IPR2014-00220 Faegre Drinker
Sep
9
2015
Unverferth Manufacturing v. J&M Manufacturing Co: Final Written Decision Finding All Claims Unpatentable Over Evidence of Secondary Considerations IPR2014-00758 Faegre Drinker
Sep
12
2015
Arris Group v. Cirrex Systems: Infringement Complaint Provides Notice of Infringement for All Patent Claims IPR2015-00530 Faegre Drinker
Sep
16
2015
Tissue Transplant Technology LTD. & Human Biologics of Texas Ltd. v. Mimedx Group, Inc.: Institution Denied For Lack Of Articulated Reasoning For The Alleged Combination Of References IPR2015-00320 Faegre Drinker
Sep
18
2015
Accord and Apotex and Amneal and Teva Pharmaceutical et. al. v. Daiichi Sankyo Co: Granting Institution of Inter Partes Review Over Objection that All Real Parties-in-Interest Were Not Identified Faegre Drinker
Sep
29
2015
Boston Scientific Corp. v. UAB Research Foundation, Benefit from Earlier Filing Date Results in Denial of Institution IPR2015-00918 Faegre Drinker
Oct
7
2015
RPX Corporation v. Applications in Internet Time: Motion for Additional Discovery Into Real Parties-in-Interest Authorized IPR2015-01750 Faegre Drinker
 

NLR Logo

We collaborate with the world's leading lawyers to deliver news tailored for you. Sign Up to receive our free e-Newsbulletins

 

Sign Up for e-NewsBulletins