Intellectual Property Law

HB Ad Slot
HB Mobile Ad Slot

Intellectual property applies to many different areas of the legal world. Applying for patents for work-products, by individual employees, trademark laws, copyrights, and how companies leverage their IP asset-rights over employees, are just a few of the many areas the National Law Review covers as it pertains to IP.

Intellectual Property Litigation

Intellectual Property disputes are a complex area of law, often involving deep dives into complex concepts to understand the issues at play. In the United States, the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO/PTO) is the agency involved in registering patents and trademarks.   As part of the USPTO, the Patent Trial and Appeal Board settles patent disputes, using a variety of mechanisms to settle issues related to intellectual property.    Some of the mechanisms include inter partes review, post-grant procedures, and covered business method patent reviews.  Issues related to the America Invents Act are also settled through the PTAB. The National Law Review covers changes to standards held by the USPTO in litigation and other patent issues.  The Trademark Trial and Appeal Board settles disputes related to trademarks, such as an ex parte appeal from the denial of an application for registration by an examining attorney, and an inter partes opposition, cancellation, concurrent use, or interference proceeding.  Other agencies involved in patent disputes are the International Trade Commission (ITC) or the Federal Trade Commission (FTC).  The National Law Review covers patent news as it relates to Supreme Court (SCOTUS) and federal circuit courts’ appeals, as well as general patent litigation and new patent filings.

Intellectual Property in Drug Patents

Legal analysis related to drug patents and pharmaceuticals and the interplay with intellectual property issues are also covered by the National Law Review.   Drug patents, biosimilars, generic top-level domain registration (gTLD), trade secrets, non-compete clauses, and other patent application news are updated on the site regularly. Additionally, tangential issues that impact pharmaceutical companies, such as innovator liability and related litigation, are also analyzed by the legal experts who write for the National Law Review. 

Intellectual Property in an Employment Context

The National Law Review has legal analysis on the intersection between intellectual property rights and employment, and who owns ideas, the Work Made For Hire principle as well resulting litigation. Additionally, legislation such as the Defense of Trade Secrets Act and its impact on workplaces, and ongoing litigation related to the legislation is also covered.

International Intellectual Property

Visitors to the site will oftentimes read about international news as it relates to patent applications in the US, and internationally as well. Pharmaceutical patents in Brazil, medical device patent applications from the United Kingdom, or litigation from the European Union, China, India, and other international sectors, are often covered online. Visitors will find the latest coverage, news, and insights on patent applications and litigation, when visiting the National Law Review, for up-to-date practice-area news.

National Law Review Intellectual Property/Patent Law TwitterFor hourly updates on the latest news about Intellectual Property Law, IP Litigation, Patent Legislation, and more, be sure to follow our IP Law Twitter feed, and sign up for complimentary e-news bulletins.

Recent Intellectual Property, Patent, Trademark & Copyright News

Title
Custom text Organization Sort descending
Oct
1
2014
eBay, Inc. v. Advanced Auctions LLC: Denying Institution IPR2014-00806 Faegre Drinker
Oct
2
2014
Medtronic, Inc. and Medtronic Vascular, Inc. v. Endotach LLC: Denying Authorization to File Errata Sheet IPR2014-00100 Faegre Drinker
Jan
19
2021
New Year’s Resolutions Don’t Have to Be about Weight Loss: Why Conducting a Trademark Audit Should Be Part of Your Company’s New Year’s Resolutions Faegre Drinker
Oct
9
2014
Torrent Pharmaceuticals Limited v. Merck Frosst Canada & Co., Denying Institution IPR2014-00559 Faegre Drinker
Oct
21
2014
A.C. Dispensing Equipment Inc. v. Prince Castle LLC: Denying Motion to Conduct Re-Examination of Witness IPR2014-00511 Faegre Drinker
Oct
23
2014
Travelocity.com L.P., Priceline.com Inc., and Expedia, Inc. v. Cronos Technologies, LLC: Denying Request for Rehearing CBM2014-00082 Faegre Drinker
Nov
2
2014
Wireless Seismic, Inc. v Fairfield Industries, Inc., Denying Leave to File Supplemental Information IPR2014-01113 Faegre Drinker
Nov
6
2014
American Honda Motor Co., Inc .v. American Vehicular Sciences LLC: Order Regarding Objection to Evidence Faegre Drinker
Nov
17
2014
Spectra Logic Corporation v. Overland Storage Inc.: Final Written Decision IPR2013-00357 Faegre Drinker
Nov
20
2014
Microsoft Corporation v. Secure Web Conference Corporation: Granting Request for Rehearing but Declining to Modify its Previous Decision IPR2014-00745 Faegre Drinker
Nov
24
2014
Ford Motor Company v. Paice LLC & The Abell Foundation, Inc., Decision Denying Institution IPR2014-00852 Faegre Drinker
Dec
2
2014
Compass Bank, Commerce Bancshares, and First National Bank of Omaha v. Intellectual Ventures: Order on Conduct of the Proceeding IPR2014-00724 Faegre Drinker
Dec
10
2014
Marvell Semiconductor, Inc. v. Intellectual Ventures I LLC, IPR2014-00547: Denying Institution IPR2014-00547 Faegre Drinker
Aug
16
2017
Five Reasons NOT to Register Your Trademark Faegre Drinker
Feb
6
2015
Groupon, Inc. v. Blue Calypso, LLC: Final Written Decision CBM2013-00033 Faegre Drinker
Feb
24
2015
Unified Patents Inc. v. Dragon Intellectual Property, LLC: Decision on Institution of Inter Partes Review IPR2014-01252 Faegre Drinker
Mar
16
2015
Target Corp. v. Destination Maternity Corp., Final Written Decision IPR2013-00532 Faegre Drinker
Mar
18
2015
Kaiser Aluminum v. Constellium Rolled Products Ravenswood, LLC: Denying Motion for Pro Hac Vice Admission IPR2014-01002 Faegre Drinker
Mar
22
2015
Priceline.com, Inc., Travelocity.com LP, and Yahoo! Inc. v. Metasearch Systems: Final Written Decision CBM2014-00001 Faegre Drinker
Apr
1
2015
ZTE (USA), Inc. and Huawei Device USA, Inc. v. Electronics and Telecommunications Research Institute: Denying Institution of Inter Partes Review IPR2015-00029 Faegre Drinker
Apr
8
2015
Artsana USA, Inc. v. Kolcraft Enterprises, Inc.: Granting Request for Adverse Judgment IPR2014-01053 Faegre Drinker
Apr
15
2015
GSI Tech v. Cypress Semiconductor Corp: Final Written Decision IPR2014-00121 Faegre Drinker
Apr
17
2015
Askeladden LLC v. Sean I. McGhie and Brian Buchheit: Order on Conduct of the Proceeding IPR2015-00122-125, 133, 137 Faegre Drinker
Apr
29
2015
Baxter Healthcare Corp., Apatech, Inc., and Apatech Limited v. Millenium Biologix, LLC, Final Written Decision IPR2013-00582 Faegre Drinker
Apr
30
2015
Microsoft Corp v. Enfish: Final Written Decision IPR2013-00559 Faegre Drinker
May
20
2015
J.P. Morgan Chase & Co. v. Intellectual Ventures II LLC: Denying Request for Rehearing CBM2014-00157 Faegre Drinker
May
23
2015
Google v. SimpleAir: Denying institution For Not Qualifying for Covered Business Method Review CBM2015-00019 Faegre Drinker
Jun
2
2015
Pacific Market Int’l v. Ignite USA: Excusing Late Filing IPR2014-00561,750 Faegre Drinker
 

NLR Logo

We collaborate with the world's leading lawyers to deliver news tailored for you. Sign Up to receive our free e-Newsbulletins

 

Sign Up for e-NewsBulletins