Intellectual Property Law

HB Ad Slot
HB Mobile Ad Slot

Intellectual property applies to many different areas of the legal world. Applying for patents for work-products, by individual employees, trademark laws, copyrights, and how companies leverage their IP asset-rights over employees, are just a few of the many areas the National Law Review covers as it pertains to IP.

Intellectual Property Litigation

Intellectual Property disputes are a complex area of law, often involving deep dives into complex concepts to understand the issues at play. In the United States, the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO/PTO) is the agency involved in registering patents and trademarks.   As part of the USPTO, the Patent Trial and Appeal Board settles patent disputes, using a variety of mechanisms to settle issues related to intellectual property.    Some of the mechanisms include inter partes review, post-grant procedures, and covered business method patent reviews.  Issues related to the America Invents Act are also settled through the PTAB. The National Law Review covers changes to standards held by the USPTO in litigation and other patent issues.  The Trademark Trial and Appeal Board settles disputes related to trademarks, such as an ex parte appeal from the denial of an application for registration by an examining attorney, and an inter partes opposition, cancellation, concurrent use, or interference proceeding.  Other agencies involved in patent disputes are the International Trade Commission (ITC) or the Federal Trade Commission (FTC).  The National Law Review covers patent news as it relates to Supreme Court (SCOTUS) and federal circuit courts’ appeals, as well as general patent litigation and new patent filings.

Intellectual Property in Drug Patents

Legal analysis related to drug patents and pharmaceuticals and the interplay with intellectual property issues are also covered by the National Law Review.   Drug patents, biosimilars, generic top-level domain registration (gTLD), trade secrets, non-compete clauses, and other patent application news are updated on the site regularly. Additionally, tangential issues that impact pharmaceutical companies, such as innovator liability and related litigation, are also analyzed by the legal experts who write for the National Law Review. 

Intellectual Property in an Employment Context

The National Law Review has legal analysis on the intersection between intellectual property rights and employment, and who owns ideas, the Work Made For Hire principle as well resulting litigation. Additionally, legislation such as the Defense of Trade Secrets Act and its impact on workplaces, and ongoing litigation related to the legislation is also covered.

International Intellectual Property

Visitors to the site will oftentimes read about international news as it relates to patent applications in the US, and internationally as well. Pharmaceutical patents in Brazil, medical device patent applications from the United Kingdom, or litigation from the European Union, China, India, and other international sectors, are often covered online. Visitors will find the latest coverage, news, and insights on patent applications and litigation, when visiting the National Law Review, for up-to-date practice-area news.

National Law Review Intellectual Property/Patent Law TwitterFor hourly updates on the latest news about Intellectual Property Law, IP Litigation, Patent Legislation, and more, be sure to follow our IP Law Twitter feed, and sign up for complimentary e-news bulletins.

Recent Intellectual Property, Patent, Trademark & Copyright News

Title
Custom text Organization Sort descending
Jul
22
2014
Google Inc. and Yahoo! Inc. v. CreateAds LLC, Decision Regarding Standard for Claim Construction IPR2014-00200 Faegre Drinker
Jul
25
2014
Motorola Mobility LLC v. Intellectual Ventures I LLC, Denying Leave to File Additional Briefing Regarding Updated Mandatory Notice IPR2014-00504 Faegre Drinker
Jul
30
2014
Shaw Industries Group, Inc. v. Automated Creel Systems, Inc: Final Written Decision Faegre Drinker
Jul
31
2014
Intelligent Bio-Systems, Inc. v. Illumina Cambridge Limited, Final Written Decision IPR2013-00128 Faegre Drinker
Aug
4
2014
Veeam Software Corporation v. Symantec Corporation, Final Written Decision IPR2013-00150 Faegre Drinker
Dec
12
2016
Second Chance for Supplemental Register Registrations: Debunking “Myths” about Re-Filing on Principal Register Faegre Drinker
Aug
7
2014
3D-Matrix, Ltd. v. Menicon Co., Ltd., Denying Institution of Inter Partes Review IPR2014-00398 Faegre Drinker
Aug
15
2014
TRW Automotive US LLC v. Magna Electronics Inc: Denying Request for Rehearing of Decision on Institution IPR2014-00263 Faegre Drinker
Aug
21
2014
International Securities Exchange, LLC v. Chicago Board Options Exchange, Incorporated: Order Regarding Motion to Seal IPR2014-00097, 98 Faegre Drinker
Sep
16
2014
Iron Dome LLC v. Chinook Licensing DE LLC: Denying Authorization to File a Motion for Sanctions IPR2014-00674 Faegre Drinker
Sep
19
2014
Standard Innovation Corporation v. Lelo, Inc.: Granting Motion to Deem Response Timely Filed IPR2014-00148 Faegre Drinker
Sep
25
2014
Adobe Systems Land Level 3 Communications v. Afluo, LLC: Denying Motion to Strike IPR 2014-00153, 154 Faegre Drinker
Sep
29
2014
Rackspace Hosting, Inc. v. Rotatable Technologies LLC: Final Written Decision and Denied Motion to Amend IPR2013-00248 Faegre Drinker
Sep
30
2014
Canon Inc. v. Intellectual Ventures I LLC, Decisions on Institution IPR2014-00535, 536, 537 Faegre Drinker
Oct
21
2014
Mobotix Corp. v. e-Watch, Inc.: Final Written Decision IPR2013-00337 Faegre Drinker
Oct
28
2014
First Data Corp. v. Cardsoft (Assignment for the Benefit of Creditors), LLC: Decision Denying Institution of Inter Partes Review IPR2014-00715 Faegre Drinker
Oct
30
2014
Samsung Electronics v. Rembrandt Wireless Technologies: Denying Rehearing of Desicion not to Institute IPR2014-00514 Faegre Drinker
Oct
31
2014
Intelligent Bio-Systems, Inc. v. Illumina Cambridge Limited, Final Written Decision Update IPR2013-00266 Faegre Drinker
Nov
4
2014
International Business Machines Corporation v. Intellectual Ventures II LLC: Denying Institution of Inter Partes Review IPR2014-00681 Faegre Drinker
Nov
17
2014
Silicon Laboratories, Inc. v. Cresta Technology Corporation: Denying Request for Rehearing of Institution Denial IPR2014-00728 Faegre Drinker
Dec
3
2014
Google Inc. v. Grandeye Ltd.: Final Written Decision IPR2013-00546 Faegre Drinker
Jan
1
2015
FLIR Systems, Inc. v. Leak Surveys, Inc.: Order Regarding Institution of Inter Partes Review IPR2015-00065 Faegre Drinker
Jan
5
2015
USPTO Publishes New Guidelines for Patent-Eligible Subject Matter: Naturally Derived Subject Matter Faegre Drinker
Jan
11
2015
Permobil Inc. v. Pride Mobility Products Corporation, Final Written Decision IPR2013-00407 Faegre Drinker
Jan
26
2015
LG Display, Ltd. v. Innovative Display Technologies: Denying Institution of Inter Partes Review IPR2014-01095 Faegre Drinker
Jan
27
2015
LG Display Co., Ltd. v. Innovative Display Technologies LLC: Denying Institution IPR2014-01092 Faegre Drinker
Feb
24
2015
Unified Patents Inc. v. Dragon Intellectual Property, LLC: Decision on Institution of Inter Partes Review IPR2014-01252 Faegre Drinker
Mar
16
2015
Target Corp. v. Destination Maternity Corp., Final Written Decision IPR2013-00532 Faegre Drinker
 

NLR Logo

We collaborate with the world's leading lawyers to deliver news tailored for you. Sign Up to receive our free e-Newsbulletins

 

Sign Up for e-NewsBulletins