Intellectual Property Law

HB Ad Slot
HB Mobile Ad Slot

Intellectual property applies to many different areas of the legal world. Applying for patents for work-products, by individual employees, trademark laws, copyrights, and how companies leverage their IP asset-rights over employees, are just a few of the many areas the National Law Review covers as it pertains to IP.

Intellectual Property Litigation

Intellectual Property disputes are a complex area of law, often involving deep dives into complex concepts to understand the issues at play. In the United States, the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO/PTO) is the agency involved in registering patents and trademarks.   As part of the USPTO, the Patent Trial and Appeal Board settles patent disputes, using a variety of mechanisms to settle issues related to intellectual property.    Some of the mechanisms include inter partes review, post-grant procedures, and covered business method patent reviews.  Issues related to the America Invents Act are also settled through the PTAB. The National Law Review covers changes to standards held by the USPTO in litigation and other patent issues.  The Trademark Trial and Appeal Board settles disputes related to trademarks, such as an ex parte appeal from the denial of an application for registration by an examining attorney, and an inter partes opposition, cancellation, concurrent use, or interference proceeding.  Other agencies involved in patent disputes are the International Trade Commission (ITC) or the Federal Trade Commission (FTC).  The National Law Review covers patent news as it relates to Supreme Court (SCOTUS) and federal circuit courts’ appeals, as well as general patent litigation and new patent filings.

Intellectual Property in Drug Patents

Legal analysis related to drug patents and pharmaceuticals and the interplay with intellectual property issues are also covered by the National Law Review.   Drug patents, biosimilars, generic top-level domain registration (gTLD), trade secrets, non-compete clauses, and other patent application news are updated on the site regularly. Additionally, tangential issues that impact pharmaceutical companies, such as innovator liability and related litigation, are also analyzed by the legal experts who write for the National Law Review. 

Intellectual Property in an Employment Context

The National Law Review has legal analysis on the intersection between intellectual property rights and employment, and who owns ideas, the Work Made For Hire principle as well resulting litigation. Additionally, legislation such as the Defense of Trade Secrets Act and its impact on workplaces, and ongoing litigation related to the legislation is also covered.

International Intellectual Property

Visitors to the site will oftentimes read about international news as it relates to patent applications in the US, and internationally as well. Pharmaceutical patents in Brazil, medical device patent applications from the United Kingdom, or litigation from the European Union, China, India, and other international sectors, are often covered online. Visitors will find the latest coverage, news, and insights on patent applications and litigation, when visiting the National Law Review, for up-to-date practice-area news.

National Law Review Intellectual Property/Patent Law TwitterFor hourly updates on the latest news about Intellectual Property Law, IP Litigation, Patent Legislation, and more, be sure to follow our IP Law Twitter feed, and sign up for complimentary e-news bulletins.

Recent Intellectual Property, Patent, Trademark & Copyright News

Title
Custom text Organization Sort descending
Feb
18
2015
TD Ameritrade Holding Corp., et al. v. Trading Technologies Int’l, Inc: Order Regarding Translator Declarations Faegre Drinker
Feb
25
2015
Johnson Health Tech Co. Ltd. and Johnson Health Tech North America, Inc. v. Icon Health Fitness, Inc.: Denying Institution IPR2014-01242 Faegre Drinker
Mar
4
2015
Amneal Pharmaceuticals, LLC v. Endo Pharmaceuticals Inc., IPR2014-01365: Granting Petitioner’s Request for Joinder Faegre Drinker
Mar
10
2015
International Securities Exchange, LLC v. Chicago Board Options Exchange, Inc: Final Written Decision CBM2013-00049 and IPR2014-00097 Faegre Drinker
Apr
17
2015
Tempur Sealy v. Select Comfort: Denying Institution IPR2014-01419 Faegre Drinker
Apr
22
2015
TRW Automotive U.S. LLC v. Magna Electronics Inc., Denying Institution IPR2014-01346 Faegre Drinker
Apr
24
2015
Fujitsu Semiconductor v. Zond: Decision Granting Petitioner Page Extension IPR2014-00781 Faegre Drinker
May
20
2015
Oxford Nanopore Tech. Ltd. v. Univ. of Washington and UAB Research Foundation: Granting Motion for Joinder IPR2015-00057 Faegre Drinker
May
22
2015
Apple Inc. v. E-Watch, Inc., Decision Denying Institution IPR2015-00413 Faegre Drinker
May
28
2015
Hyundai Mobis and Mobis Alabama v. Autoliv ASP: Granting Motion for Additional Discovery IPR2014-01005 Faegre Drinker
Jun
29
2015
Reloaded Games v. Parallel Networks: Final Written Decision Finding Claims Unpatentable Based Upon Patent Owner’s Narrow Claim Construction IPR2014-00139 Faegre Drinker
Jul
16
2015
E*TRADE Financial Corp. v. Droplets, Inc. Denying Institution due to Redundacy with Other Proceeding IPR2015-00471 Faegre Drinker
Aug
5
2015
Fresenius-Kabi USA LLC v. Cubist Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Granting Institution of Challenged Claims IPR2015-00227 Faegre Drinker
Aug
13
2015
Netsirv and Local Motion v. Boxbee: Granted Institution Of Patent Eligibility Ground But Insufficient Evidence Of Public Use PGR2015-00009 Faegre Drinker
Aug
24
2015
Agila Specialties Inc., et al. v. Cephalon, Inc.: Authorizing Filing of Motion to Disqualify Expert IPR2015-00503 Faegre Drinker
Sep
6
2012
The FDA Proposes New Rule on Unique Medical Device Identification and Marking Requirements Faegre Drinker
Sep
8
2015
Sony Corp. of Am. v. Network-1 Techs: Denying Institution where Claimed Invention Merely Capable of Use with a Financial Service CBM2015-00078 Faegre Drinker
Sep
11
2015
Daifuku America Corp. v. Murata Machinery: Denying Motion to Apply for Subpoena for Failure to Provide Basis for Cross-Examination of Translator IPR2015-00083; IPR2015-00085; IPR2015-00088 Faegre Drinker
Sep
15
2015
Edmund Optics v. Semrock: Final Written Decision According Little or No Weight to Expert Testimony Repeating Attorney Argument IPR2014-00583 Faegre Drinker
Sep
22
2015
Euro-Pro Operating v. Arcone Enterprises: Final Written Decision Finding All Challenged Claims Unpatentable IPR2014-00351 Faegre Drinker
Oct
6
2015
IGB Automotive and I.G. Bauerhin GmbH v. Gentherm GmbH: Final Written Decision Finding Claims Unpatentable Where Inventors do not Allege Conception of all Limitations Prior to Petitioner’s Reference IPR2014-00664 Faegre Drinker
Oct
20
2015
Dr. Reddy’s Labs., Inc. v. Pozen Inc.: Institution Denied Where Petitioner Impermissibly Relied Upon the Teachings of the Challenged Patent Faegre Drinker
Nov
4
2015
Phigenix, Inc. v. Immunogen, Inc.: Final Written Decision Finding No Claims Found Unpatentable Based On Evidence Of Nonobviousness IPR2014-00676 Faegre Drinker
Mar
7
2013
United States Patent and Trademark Office (PTO) Reopens Public Hearing on Genetic Diagnostic Testing Faegre Drinker
Nov
11
2015
NetApp v. Crossroads Systems: Denying Institution Under § 325(d) IPR2015-00772 Faegre Drinker
Nov
16
2015
IGB Automotive v. Gentherm GmbH: Final Written Decision Adopting Patent Owner’s Proposed Claim Construction IPR2014-00667 Faegre Drinker
Dec
3
2015
Eastman Kodak, Agfa Corp, Esko Software Bvba, and Heidleberg, USA v. CTP Innovations - Final Written Decision Confirming All Challenged Claims IPR2014-00788 Faegre Drinker
Dec
8
2015
Masterimage 3d et al. v. Reald: Denying Request to File Motion to Expunge Where Issue Could be Addressed in Sur-Reply IPR2015-00035 Faegre Drinker
 

NLR Logo

We collaborate with the world's leading lawyers to deliver news tailored for you. Sign Up to receive our free e-Newsbulletins

 

Sign Up for e-NewsBulletins