Intellectual Property Law

HB Ad Slot
HB Mobile Ad Slot

Intellectual property applies to many different areas of the legal world. Applying for patents for work-products, by individual employees, trademark laws, copyrights, and how companies leverage their IP asset-rights over employees, are just a few of the many areas the National Law Review covers as it pertains to IP.

Intellectual Property Litigation

Intellectual Property disputes are a complex area of law, often involving deep dives into complex concepts to understand the issues at play. In the United States, the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO/PTO) is the agency involved in registering patents and trademarks.   As part of the USPTO, the Patent Trial and Appeal Board settles patent disputes, using a variety of mechanisms to settle issues related to intellectual property.    Some of the mechanisms include inter partes review, post-grant procedures, and covered business method patent reviews.  Issues related to the America Invents Act are also settled through the PTAB. The National Law Review covers changes to standards held by the USPTO in litigation and other patent issues.  The Trademark Trial and Appeal Board settles disputes related to trademarks, such as an ex parte appeal from the denial of an application for registration by an examining attorney, and an inter partes opposition, cancellation, concurrent use, or interference proceeding.  Other agencies involved in patent disputes are the International Trade Commission (ITC) or the Federal Trade Commission (FTC).  The National Law Review covers patent news as it relates to Supreme Court (SCOTUS) and federal circuit courts’ appeals, as well as general patent litigation and new patent filings.

Intellectual Property in Drug Patents

Legal analysis related to drug patents and pharmaceuticals and the interplay with intellectual property issues are also covered by the National Law Review.   Drug patents, biosimilars, generic top-level domain registration (gTLD), trade secrets, non-compete clauses, and other patent application news are updated on the site regularly. Additionally, tangential issues that impact pharmaceutical companies, such as innovator liability and related litigation, are also analyzed by the legal experts who write for the National Law Review. 

Intellectual Property in an Employment Context

The National Law Review has legal analysis on the intersection between intellectual property rights and employment, and who owns ideas, the Work Made For Hire principle as well resulting litigation. Additionally, legislation such as the Defense of Trade Secrets Act and its impact on workplaces, and ongoing litigation related to the legislation is also covered.

International Intellectual Property

Visitors to the site will oftentimes read about international news as it relates to patent applications in the US, and internationally as well. Pharmaceutical patents in Brazil, medical device patent applications from the United Kingdom, or litigation from the European Union, China, India, and other international sectors, are often covered online. Visitors will find the latest coverage, news, and insights on patent applications and litigation, when visiting the National Law Review, for up-to-date practice-area news.

National Law Review Intellectual Property/Patent Law TwitterFor hourly updates on the latest news about Intellectual Property Law, IP Litigation, Patent Legislation, and more, be sure to follow our IP Law Twitter feed, and sign up for complimentary e-news bulletins.

Recent Intellectual Property, Patent, Trademark & Copyright News

Title
Custom text Organization Sort descending
Mar
18
2015
Fujian Newland Computer Co., Ltd. v. Hand Held Products, Inc.: Final Written Decision IPR2013-00595 Faegre Drinker
Mar
23
2015
Kaiser Aluminum v. Constellium Rolled Products Ravenswood: Decision Granting Revised Pro Hac Vice Motion IPR2014-01002 Faegre Drinker
Apr
22
2015
Atlanta Gas Light Company v. Bennett Regulator Guards: Granting Motion to Expunge IPR2013-00453 Faegre Drinker
Apr
28
2015
Apple Twitter and Yelp v. Evolutionary Intelligence: Final Written Decision IPR2014-00086 Faegre Drinker
May
8
2015
Purdue Pharma v. Depomed: Denying Request for Rehearing Decision on Institution IPR2014-00379 Faegre Drinker
May
19
2015
Medtronic v. NuVasive: Final Written Decision IPR2014-00073 Faegre Drinker
May
21
2015
Oxford Nanopore Technologies v. University of Washington and UAB Research Foundation: Granting Joinder and Instituting Review of Second Petition by Same Party IPR2015-00057 Faegre Drinker
Jun
23
2015
Kyocera Corporation v. Adaptix: Institution Denied Where Petitioner Relied On Disclosure of Challenged Patent IPR2015-00318 Faegre Drinker
Jun
29
2015
Chums, Inc. and Croakies, Inc. v. Cablz, Inc.: Decision Denying Patent Owner’s Motion for Additional Discovery Faegre Drinker
Jun
30
2015
Teva Pharm v. ViiV Healthcare Co: Denying Joinder Where Agreement to File Consolidated Papers Was Not Obtained IPR2015-00550 Faegre Drinker
Jul
10
2015
NESTLÉ USA, INC. v. STEUBEN FOODS, INC., PTAB Considered Opportunity to Litigate in Determining Privity IPR2015-00195 Faegre Drinker
Jul
21
2015
MaserImage 3D v. RealD: Order Providing Guidance for a Motion to Amend IPR2015-00040 Faegre Drinker
Aug
5
2015
Apple Inc. v. SmartFlash LLC: Denying Authorization for Discovery Regarding Non-Infringement Defense Faegre Drinker
Aug
12
2015
ZTE Corporation, ZTE (USA) Inc., and T-Mobile USA Inc. v. Adaptix Inc.: Joinder Denied When New Declaration Used In New Petition IPR2015-01184 Faegre Drinker
Aug
14
2015
Jack Henry v. DataTreasury Corp: Final Written Decision Denying Motion to Exclude Allegedly Improperly Submitted Exhibit CBM2014-00056 Faegre Drinker
Aug
20
2015
Globalfoundries Dresden and Gillette v. Zond: Evidence Establishing Date of Cataloging and Shelving Not Required IPR2014-01086 Faegre Drinker
Aug
24
2015
FedEx v. Katz Tech Licensing: Denial of Institution Where Unsworn Declaration Given No Weight CBM2015-00053 Faegre Drinker
Sep
2
2015
BLD Services, LLC v. LMK Technologies, LLC: Denying Institution Based on Same or Substantially the Same Prior Art Previously Presented to the Board IPR2015-00723 Faegre Drinker
Sep
8
2015
Esselte Corp. v. Dymo: Assignor Estoppel and Contractual Bar Were Not Found As Defenses Against An IPR Challenge IPR2015-00781 Faegre Drinker
Sep
15
2015
Motorola Mobility v. Intellectual Ventures I: Order Denying Motion to Expunge Where no Prejudice Exists IPR2014-00500 Faegre Drinker
Oct
5
2015
Endo Pharmaceuticals v. Depomed: Final Written Decision Finding All Challenged Claims Unpatentable IPR2014-00652 Faegre Drinker
Oct
7
2015
Apple, Inc. v. Personal Web Technologies: Request for Rehearing of Final Written Decision Denied IPR2013-00596 Faegre Drinker
Oct
19
2015
Hopkins Manufacturing v. Cequent Performance Products: Petition for Inter Partes Review Denied IPR2015-00616 Faegre Drinker
Nov
30
2015
PNC and SunTrust Bank v. Parus Holdings: Denying Institution Because Patent Ineligible for CBM Review CBM2015-00109; CBM2015-00149 Faegre Drinker
Dec
16
2015
Ford Motor Co v. Paice & Abell Foundation: Final Written Decision Finding Some Claim Challenges Estopped IPR2014-00884 Faegre Drinker
Dec
18
2015
Zero Gravity Inside v. FootBalance System Oy: Denying Request to File Reply to Preliminary Response IPR2015-01769,70 Faegre Drinker
Dec
28
2015
MotionPoint Corp v. TransPerfect Global: Reply to Preliminary Response Authorized To Address Standing CBM2015-00168, 178 Faegre Drinker
Dec
31
2015
Hewlett-Packard Co. v. U.S. Philips Corp., et al.: Order Denying Authorization to File Reply to Preliminary Response Faegre Drinker
 

NLR Logo

We collaborate with the world's leading lawyers to deliver news tailored for you. Sign Up to receive our free e-Newsbulletins

 

Sign Up for e-NewsBulletins