Intellectual Property Law

HB Ad Slot
HB Mobile Ad Slot

Intellectual property applies to many different areas of the legal world. Applying for patents for work-products, by individual employees, trademark laws, copyrights, and how companies leverage their IP asset-rights over employees, are just a few of the many areas the National Law Review covers as it pertains to IP.

Intellectual Property Litigation

Intellectual Property disputes are a complex area of law, often involving deep dives into complex concepts to understand the issues at play. In the United States, the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO/PTO) is the agency involved in registering patents and trademarks.   As part of the USPTO, the Patent Trial and Appeal Board settles patent disputes, using a variety of mechanisms to settle issues related to intellectual property.    Some of the mechanisms include inter partes review, post-grant procedures, and covered business method patent reviews.  Issues related to the America Invents Act are also settled through the PTAB. The National Law Review covers changes to standards held by the USPTO in litigation and other patent issues.  The Trademark Trial and Appeal Board settles disputes related to trademarks, such as an ex parte appeal from the denial of an application for registration by an examining attorney, and an inter partes opposition, cancellation, concurrent use, or interference proceeding.  Other agencies involved in patent disputes are the International Trade Commission (ITC) or the Federal Trade Commission (FTC).  The National Law Review covers patent news as it relates to Supreme Court (SCOTUS) and federal circuit courts’ appeals, as well as general patent litigation and new patent filings.

Intellectual Property in Drug Patents

Legal analysis related to drug patents and pharmaceuticals and the interplay with intellectual property issues are also covered by the National Law Review.   Drug patents, biosimilars, generic top-level domain registration (gTLD), trade secrets, non-compete clauses, and other patent application news are updated on the site regularly. Additionally, tangential issues that impact pharmaceutical companies, such as innovator liability and related litigation, are also analyzed by the legal experts who write for the National Law Review. 

Intellectual Property in an Employment Context

The National Law Review has legal analysis on the intersection between intellectual property rights and employment, and who owns ideas, the Work Made For Hire principle as well resulting litigation. Additionally, legislation such as the Defense of Trade Secrets Act and its impact on workplaces, and ongoing litigation related to the legislation is also covered.

International Intellectual Property

Visitors to the site will oftentimes read about international news as it relates to patent applications in the US, and internationally as well. Pharmaceutical patents in Brazil, medical device patent applications from the United Kingdom, or litigation from the European Union, China, India, and other international sectors, are often covered online. Visitors will find the latest coverage, news, and insights on patent applications and litigation, when visiting the National Law Review, for up-to-date practice-area news.

National Law Review Intellectual Property/Patent Law TwitterFor hourly updates on the latest news about Intellectual Property Law, IP Litigation, Patent Legislation, and more, be sure to follow our IP Law Twitter feed, and sign up for complimentary e-news bulletins.

Recent Intellectual Property, Patent, Trademark & Copyright News

Title
Custom text Organization Sort descending
Nov
16
2016
Seventh Circuit Finds General Description of Trade Secret Sufficient to Satisfy Pleading Standard under Defend Trade Secrets Act Mintz
Jul
9
2020
The Standard May Rule Them All: Federal Circuit Panel Appears Prepared to Find Standard Is Sufficient to Prove Infringement for SEP Compliant Products Mintz
Jul
28
2020
Fractured Federal Circuit Panel Finds That Sovereign Immunity Does Not Prevent Exclusive Licensee from Pursuing Unlicensed Infringement Alone Mintz
Sep
10
2020
Rules of Engagement: Minimizing Trade Secret Disputes when Hiring Rival Employees Mintz
Oct
29
2020
U.S. Trademark Office Issues Guide on How It Will Apply the Supreme Court’s Booking.com Decision to Examination of Relevant Applications Mintz
Oct
3
2014
Did the USPTO Really Improve the ‘After Final Consideration Pilot’? Mintz
Dec
7
2020
Is This Seat Taken? A Chinese IP Court Proclaims Its Authority to Declare Global FRAND Terms Mintz
Mar
22
2017
Global Dossier Expanded To More Patent Applications Around the World Mintz
Apr
4
2017
Importance of Getting Inventorship Right: Cautionary Tale in Two Cases Mintz
Oct
30
2014
“Why, I declare” … Proper Use of Evidentiary Declarations under New (Post-AIA) Rule 37 C.F.R. 1.130 Mintz
Nov
3
2014
New European Unity Rules in Effect November 1, 2014 Mintz
May
30
2017
DTSA and Inevitable Disclosure (Defend Trade Secrets Act) Mintz
May
31
2017
Supreme Court Overrules and Rewrites 25 Years of Federal Circuit Law on Patent Exhaustion Mintz
May
7
2021
Patent Owner Tip #5 for Surviving An Instituted IPR: The Right Expert Can Save Your Patent Mintz
May
27
2021
Patent Owner Tip #8 for Surviving an Instituted IPR: Additional Discovery is Possible, but Should be Carefully Planned Mintz
Aug
15
2017
Federal Circuit Says PTO Submissions can Waive Privilege to Future Communications Mintz
Jun
10
2021
Patent Owner Tip #9 for Surviving an Instituted IPR: Issues Warranting Limited Additional Discovery Mintz
Mar
8
2015
Application Drafting Dangers Highlighted by Pacing Technologies v. Garmin International Mintz
Apr
16
2015
DOJ’s Endorsement of IEEE Patent Policy Takes Center Stage at IP Antitrust Conference Mintz
Feb
6
2022
Prior Daubert Orders and Discovery Lessons Out of N.D. Cal. Mintz
May
28
2015
PTAB Issues ‘Quick Fix’ Rule Package, Effective Immediately Mintz
Sep
14
2017
Have You Started Auditing Your Contracts with Your Service Providers that Handle EU Personal Data? UK Information Commissioner’s Office Issues Draft Guidance for Compliance with the GDPR’s Contracting Requirements. Mintz
Mar
10
2022
Open Question: Use of Stolen Trade Secrets May or May Not Qualify as a Predicate Act Under RICO Mintz
Sep
25
2017
Federal Circuit Clarifies Venue Requirement Post-TC Heartland by Granting Mandamus Relief in In re Cray Mintz
Sep
29
2017
Recap on Design Patent Drawings Mintz
Oct
12
2017
Chief Judge Stark Rejects Motion for Enhanced Damages Award Due to the Public Interest in the Accused Hepatitis C Virus Treatments Mintz
Nov
1
2017
Building a Health App? Part 7: Commercialization and Strategic Partners Mintz
Feb
16
2012
Linsanity: The Trademark Mintz
 

NLR Logo

We collaborate with the world's leading lawyers to deliver news tailored for you. Sign Up to receive our free e-Newsbulletins

 

Sign Up for e-NewsBulletins