Intellectual Property Law

HB Ad Slot
HB Mobile Ad Slot

Intellectual property applies to many different areas of the legal world. Applying for patents for work-products, by individual employees, trademark laws, copyrights, and how companies leverage their IP asset-rights over employees, are just a few of the many areas the National Law Review covers as it pertains to IP.

Intellectual Property Litigation

Intellectual Property disputes are a complex area of law, often involving deep dives into complex concepts to understand the issues at play. In the United States, the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO/PTO) is the agency involved in registering patents and trademarks.   As part of the USPTO, the Patent Trial and Appeal Board settles patent disputes, using a variety of mechanisms to settle issues related to intellectual property.    Some of the mechanisms include inter partes review, post-grant procedures, and covered business method patent reviews.  Issues related to the America Invents Act are also settled through the PTAB. The National Law Review covers changes to standards held by the USPTO in litigation and other patent issues.  The Trademark Trial and Appeal Board settles disputes related to trademarks, such as an ex parte appeal from the denial of an application for registration by an examining attorney, and an inter partes opposition, cancellation, concurrent use, or interference proceeding.  Other agencies involved in patent disputes are the International Trade Commission (ITC) or the Federal Trade Commission (FTC).  The National Law Review covers patent news as it relates to Supreme Court (SCOTUS) and federal circuit courts’ appeals, as well as general patent litigation and new patent filings.

Intellectual Property in Drug Patents

Legal analysis related to drug patents and pharmaceuticals and the interplay with intellectual property issues are also covered by the National Law Review.   Drug patents, biosimilars, generic top-level domain registration (gTLD), trade secrets, non-compete clauses, and other patent application news are updated on the site regularly. Additionally, tangential issues that impact pharmaceutical companies, such as innovator liability and related litigation, are also analyzed by the legal experts who write for the National Law Review. 

Intellectual Property in an Employment Context

The National Law Review has legal analysis on the intersection between intellectual property rights and employment, and who owns ideas, the Work Made For Hire principle as well resulting litigation. Additionally, legislation such as the Defense of Trade Secrets Act and its impact on workplaces, and ongoing litigation related to the legislation is also covered.

International Intellectual Property

Visitors to the site will oftentimes read about international news as it relates to patent applications in the US, and internationally as well. Pharmaceutical patents in Brazil, medical device patent applications from the United Kingdom, or litigation from the European Union, China, India, and other international sectors, are often covered online. Visitors will find the latest coverage, news, and insights on patent applications and litigation, when visiting the National Law Review, for up-to-date practice-area news.

National Law Review Intellectual Property/Patent Law TwitterFor hourly updates on the latest news about Intellectual Property Law, IP Litigation, Patent Legislation, and more, be sure to follow our IP Law Twitter feed, and sign up for complimentary e-news bulletins.

Recent Intellectual Property, Patent, Trademark & Copyright News

Title
Custom text Organization Sort descending
Dec
18
2015
Zero Gravity Inside v. FootBalance System Oy: Denying Request to File Reply to Preliminary Response IPR2015-01769,70 Faegre Drinker
Dec
28
2015
MotionPoint Corp v. TransPerfect Global: Reply to Preliminary Response Authorized To Address Standing CBM2015-00168, 178 Faegre Drinker
Dec
31
2015
Hewlett-Packard Co. v. U.S. Philips Corp., et al.: Order Denying Authorization to File Reply to Preliminary Response Faegre Drinker
Jan
11
2016
Unified Patents v. Olivistar: Decision Denying Institution Where Every Element Of Challenged Claims Not Identified In Prior Art IPR2015-01217 Faegre Drinker
Jan
22
2016
Pharmacosmos A/S v. Luitpold Parms. Inc - Institution Denial Finding Insufficient Evidence of Anticipation and Obviousness IPR2015-01495 Faegre Drinker
Jan
28
2016
AVX Corp. v. Greatbatch: Denying Request for Rehearing IPR2014-00697 Faegre Drinker
Apr
23
2019
The Rise of Ephemeral Messaging Apps in the Business World Faegre Drinker
Feb
2
2016
Dynamic Drinkware v. National Graphics - Final Written Decision finding Asserted Reference to be Enabling IPR2014-01162 Faegre Drinker
Feb
5
2016
Coalition for Affordable Drugs V LLC v. Biogen International GmbH - Denying Rehearing of Decision Not to Institute Based on Lack of Showing of Abuse of Discretion IPR2015-01086 Faegre Drinker
Aug
3
2013
Navigating the Isolated DNA Patent Eligibility Jungle Faegre Drinker
Feb
10
2016
Lumentum Holdings, Inc. et al. v. Capella Photonics, Inc.: Order Granting Motion to Compel IPR2015-00731 Faegre Drinker
Jun
11
2019
After Supernus: It’s Up to You to Keep Your Patent Alive All Its Days Faegre Drinker
Feb
22
2016
Shenzhen Huiding Tech v. Synaptics: Denying-in-Part Institution on Incorporation by Reference Grounds IPR2015-01739 Faegre Drinker
Mar
7
2016
Global Tel*Link Corp. v. Securus Tech: Final Written Decision Finding Obviousness Based on Combination of References with Nearly Identical Embodiments IPR2014-01283 Faegre Drinker
Mar
21
2016
Ford Motor Co. v. Paice Abell Found: Final Written Decision Finding All Challenged Claims Unpatentable IPR2014-01416 Faegre Drinker
Mar
28
2016
Askeladden v. McGhie: Final Written Decision Finding Claims Unpatentable IPR2015-00122 Faegre Drinker
Mar
31
2016
Coalition For Affordable Drugs VIII v. Trustees Of University Of Pennsylvania: Patent Not Entitled to Filing Date of Provisional Because Claims Not Supported By Provisional IPR2015-01835 Faegre Drinker
Apr
14
2016
Square v. Protegrity Corp: CBM2014-00182 Challenged Claims Unpatentable Faegre Drinker
Dec
19
2019
Don’t Miss Notices from the Canadian Intellectual Property Office regarding Madrid Protocol Trademark Applications Faegre Drinker
Mar
14
2014
Potentially Ground-Breaking Class Settlement – Data Breach Relief Faegre Drinker
May
14
2016
A Notable Week Indeed – From OSHA to Trade Secrets to ADA Accommodations and Transgender Rights! Faegre Drinker
May
23
2014
International Flavors & Fragrances Inc. v. United States, Final Written Decision (Granting Motion to Amend) IPR2013-00124 Faegre Drinker
May
30
2014
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. v. Unifi Scientific Batteries, LLC, Order Dismissing in Part Motion to Exclude IPR2013-00236 Faegre Drinker
Aug
9
2016
What to Know (and Ask!) When Opposing Foreign Trademark Application Faegre Drinker
Jun
5
2014
Canon Inc. v. Intellectual Ventures II LLC: Order Regarding Alleged Deficiencies in Petitions Faegre Drinker
Jun
6
2014
Denying Petitioner’s Request for Rehearing on Decision on Institutions: Conopco, Inc. dba Unilever v. The Procter & Gamble Company Faegre Drinker
Jun
9
2014
Microsoft Corp. v. SurfCast, Inc. Order Granting Additional Briefing IPR2013-00292 Faegre Drinker
Jun
12
2014
Bumble Bee Foods, LLC v. William R. Kowalski, Denying Institution of Inter Partes Review Faegre Drinker
 

NLR Logo

We collaborate with the world's leading lawyers to deliver news tailored for you. Sign Up to receive our free e-Newsbulletins

 

Sign Up for e-NewsBulletins