Intellectual Property Law

HB Ad Slot
HB Mobile Ad Slot

Intellectual property applies to many different areas of the legal world. Applying for patents for work-products, by individual employees, trademark laws, copyrights, and how companies leverage their IP asset-rights over employees, are just a few of the many areas the National Law Review covers as it pertains to IP.

Intellectual Property Litigation

Intellectual Property disputes are a complex area of law, often involving deep dives into complex concepts to understand the issues at play. In the United States, the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO/PTO) is the agency involved in registering patents and trademarks.   As part of the USPTO, the Patent Trial and Appeal Board settles patent disputes, using a variety of mechanisms to settle issues related to intellectual property.    Some of the mechanisms include inter partes review, post-grant procedures, and covered business method patent reviews.  Issues related to the America Invents Act are also settled through the PTAB. The National Law Review covers changes to standards held by the USPTO in litigation and other patent issues.  The Trademark Trial and Appeal Board settles disputes related to trademarks, such as an ex parte appeal from the denial of an application for registration by an examining attorney, and an inter partes opposition, cancellation, concurrent use, or interference proceeding.  Other agencies involved in patent disputes are the International Trade Commission (ITC) or the Federal Trade Commission (FTC).  The National Law Review covers patent news as it relates to Supreme Court (SCOTUS) and federal circuit courts’ appeals, as well as general patent litigation and new patent filings.

Intellectual Property in Drug Patents

Legal analysis related to drug patents and pharmaceuticals and the interplay with intellectual property issues are also covered by the National Law Review.   Drug patents, biosimilars, generic top-level domain registration (gTLD), trade secrets, non-compete clauses, and other patent application news are updated on the site regularly. Additionally, tangential issues that impact pharmaceutical companies, such as innovator liability and related litigation, are also analyzed by the legal experts who write for the National Law Review. 

Intellectual Property in an Employment Context

The National Law Review has legal analysis on the intersection between intellectual property rights and employment, and who owns ideas, the Work Made For Hire principle as well resulting litigation. Additionally, legislation such as the Defense of Trade Secrets Act and its impact on workplaces, and ongoing litigation related to the legislation is also covered.

International Intellectual Property

Visitors to the site will oftentimes read about international news as it relates to patent applications in the US, and internationally as well. Pharmaceutical patents in Brazil, medical device patent applications from the United Kingdom, or litigation from the European Union, China, India, and other international sectors, are often covered online. Visitors will find the latest coverage, news, and insights on patent applications and litigation, when visiting the National Law Review, for up-to-date practice-area news.

National Law Review Intellectual Property/Patent Law TwitterFor hourly updates on the latest news about Intellectual Property Law, IP Litigation, Patent Legislation, and more, be sure to follow our IP Law Twitter feed, and sign up for complimentary e-news bulletins.

Recent Intellectual Property, Patent, Trademark & Copyright News

Title
Custom text Organization Sort descending
Oct
20
2015
Webasto Roof Systems, Inc. v. UUSI, LLC: Final Written Decision Holding Challenged Claims Unpatentable IPR2014-00648 Faegre Drinker
Oct
23
2015
RPX Corp v. Cedatech Holdings: Statutory Disclaimer Is Not Always Treated As An Adverse Judgment IPR2015-00736 Faegre Drinker
Nov
2
2015
Nvidia Corp. v. Samsung Electronics Co: Petitioner Required to Map Prior Art Claims to Provisional Application IPR2015-01315 Faegre Drinker
Nov
16
2015
SAP America v. Lakshmi Arunachalam: Final Written Decision Finding Claims Unpatentable and Not Entitled to Priority Date of Parent Application IPR2014-00414 Faegre Drinker
Nov
19
2015
HTC COR v. NFC TECHNOLOGY: Declaration Expunged Where Declarant Refused Cross-Examination IPR2014-01198 Faegre Drinker
Dec
3
2015
Vitro Packaging v. Saverglass: Denying Institution Of Design Patent Based On Distinctive Visual Appearance Of Claimed Design Over Prior Art IPR2015-00947 Faegre Drinker
Dec
8
2015
Zhejiang Yankon Group v. Cordelia Lighting: Denying Institution for Failing to Name All Real Parties-in-Interest IPR2015-01420 Faegre Drinker
Dec
11
2015
Bungie v. Worlds: Decision Instituting Inter Partes Review of All Challenged Claims IPR2015-01319 Faegre Drinker
Dec
16
2015
Netflix v. Copy Protection: Order Regarding Withdrawal and Substitution of Counsel IPR2015-00921 Faegre Drinker
Dec
18
2015
Osram Sylvania v. Jam Strait: Final Written Decision Construing “Adapted For” Language in Preamble IPR2014-00703 Faegre Drinker
May
13
2013
The Perils and Promise of 3D Printing: Are DIY Life Sciences in Your Future? Faegre Drinker
Dec
28
2015
Actifio v. Delphix Corp: Authorized To Cross-Examine After Declaration Was Filed Regardless Of Service Date IPR2015-00014 Faegre Drinker
Dec
31
2015
ServiceNow, Inc. v. BMC Software, Inc.: Decision Denying Institution of Inter Partes Review Faegre Drinker
Jan
24
2016
Ariosa Diagnostics, Inc. v. Illumina, Inc., Final Written Decision Upholding Challenged Claims IPR2014-01093 Faegre Drinker
Jan
29
2016
NRT Tech. Corp. et al. v. Everi Payments: Denying Institution of CBM Asserting Patent Ineligibility and Prior Art Under Section 102(e) CBM2015-00167 Faegre Drinker
Feb
3
2016
Symantec Corp. v. Finjan: Denying Institution in View of Piecemeal Claim Limitation Presentation IPR2015-01548 Faegre Drinker
Feb
6
2016
BMC Medical, 3B Products, and 3B Medical v. ResMed - Final Written Decision Finding All Challenged Claims Unpatentable IPR2014-01196 Faegre Drinker
Mar
6
2019
To Claim or Not to Claim … Seniority (Guest Post from EU Firm Cleveland Scott York) Faegre Drinker
Feb
10
2016
Crestron Electronics v. Intuitive Building Controls: Petitioner Correctly Designated As Supplemental Information Exhibits Offered To Support Contention That References Are Prior Art IPR2015-01379 Faegre Drinker
Feb
12
2016
Qualtrics, LLC v. OpinionLab, Inc - Denying Institution of CBM Review Because Claims Not Directed to Financial Product or Service CBM2015-00164 Faegre Drinker
Apr
14
2016
IBG LLC, et al. v. Trading Techs. Int’l, Inc.: Extension of Time to Submit Supplemental Evidence Denied Faegre Drinker
May
3
2016
Telit Wireless Solutions v. M2M Solutions: Decision Partially Granting Institution Based on References Considered During Prosecution IPR2016-00055 Faegre Drinker
Oct
11
2019
Be on the Lookout for Potentially Misleading Trademark Solicitations Faegre Drinker
Dec
11
2019
Following Up after Oral Argument in Thryv, Inc. fka Dex Media Inc. v. Click-to-Call Technologies, LP Faegre Drinker
Jun
28
2016
Review Your Trademark Portfolio Every Which Way Faegre Drinker
May
21
2014
ABB, Inc. v. ROY-G-BIV Corp.: Final Written Decision Upholding Patentability of Challenged Claims IPR2013-00063 Faegre Drinker
Jun
3
2014
Google Inc. and Twitter, Inc. v. EveryMD.com LLC: Denying Institution of Inter Partes Review Faegre Drinker
Jun
16
2014
Apple Inc., Google Inc., and Motorola Mobility LLC v. Arrendi S.A.R.L.: Decision on Institution of Inter Partes Review Faegre Drinker
 

NLR Logo

We collaborate with the world's leading lawyers to deliver news tailored for you. Sign Up to receive our free e-Newsbulletins

 

Sign Up for e-NewsBulletins