Intellectual Property Law

HB Ad Slot
HB Mobile Ad Slot

Intellectual property applies to many different areas of the legal world. Applying for patents for work-products, by individual employees, trademark laws, copyrights, and how companies leverage their IP asset-rights over employees, are just a few of the many areas the National Law Review covers as it pertains to IP.

Intellectual Property Litigation

Intellectual Property disputes are a complex area of law, often involving deep dives into complex concepts to understand the issues at play. In the United States, the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO/PTO) is the agency involved in registering patents and trademarks.   As part of the USPTO, the Patent Trial and Appeal Board settles patent disputes, using a variety of mechanisms to settle issues related to intellectual property.    Some of the mechanisms include inter partes review, post-grant procedures, and covered business method patent reviews.  Issues related to the America Invents Act are also settled through the PTAB. The National Law Review covers changes to standards held by the USPTO in litigation and other patent issues.  The Trademark Trial and Appeal Board settles disputes related to trademarks, such as an ex parte appeal from the denial of an application for registration by an examining attorney, and an inter partes opposition, cancellation, concurrent use, or interference proceeding.  Other agencies involved in patent disputes are the International Trade Commission (ITC) or the Federal Trade Commission (FTC).  The National Law Review covers patent news as it relates to Supreme Court (SCOTUS) and federal circuit courts’ appeals, as well as general patent litigation and new patent filings.

Intellectual Property in Drug Patents

Legal analysis related to drug patents and pharmaceuticals and the interplay with intellectual property issues are also covered by the National Law Review.   Drug patents, biosimilars, generic top-level domain registration (gTLD), trade secrets, non-compete clauses, and other patent application news are updated on the site regularly. Additionally, tangential issues that impact pharmaceutical companies, such as innovator liability and related litigation, are also analyzed by the legal experts who write for the National Law Review. 

Intellectual Property in an Employment Context

The National Law Review has legal analysis on the intersection between intellectual property rights and employment, and who owns ideas, the Work Made For Hire principle as well resulting litigation. Additionally, legislation such as the Defense of Trade Secrets Act and its impact on workplaces, and ongoing litigation related to the legislation is also covered.

International Intellectual Property

Visitors to the site will oftentimes read about international news as it relates to patent applications in the US, and internationally as well. Pharmaceutical patents in Brazil, medical device patent applications from the United Kingdom, or litigation from the European Union, China, India, and other international sectors, are often covered online. Visitors will find the latest coverage, news, and insights on patent applications and litigation, when visiting the National Law Review, for up-to-date practice-area news.

National Law Review Intellectual Property/Patent Law TwitterFor hourly updates on the latest news about Intellectual Property Law, IP Litigation, Patent Legislation, and more, be sure to follow our IP Law Twitter feed, and sign up for complimentary e-news bulletins.

Recent Intellectual Property, Patent, Trademark & Copyright News

Title
Custom text Organization Sort descending
Jan
15
2021
ITC Threat for Gaming Companies Grows with PTAB Discretionary Denials Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Aug
31
2009
Joseph Abboud Is Back: Personal Name Trademark Controversy Continues Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Jun
25
2010
Smells Like Trademark Protection: Copycat Perfumes Cannot Engage in Comparative Advertising, on Odor of the Court in the UK and EU Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Apr
18
2011
Tweet Me! - The Southern District of New York Answers Copyright Questions Raised By Twitter and Twitpic Use Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Jul
31
2011
Increasing Level of Seizures by U.S. Customs Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Aug
21
2011
Court Denies Louboutin Preliminary Injunction: Holds Fashion Blind to Single Color Marks Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Jun
13
2015
Rogue Witnesses (Silicon Valley, Episode 17) Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Apr
20
2022
Thinking of Jumping on the NFT Bandwagon – Are you Prepared? Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Jan
17
2018
Patent Strategies for Cryptocurrencies and Blockchain Technology Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Mar
31
2013
BONDing WITH NPE's - The Requirement for Security for Costs or Expenses Under Section 1030 of the California Code of Civil Procedure Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
May
27
2023
Supreme Court Finds Warhol’s Commercial Licensing of “Orange Prince” to Vanity Fair Is Not Fair Use and Infringes Goldsmith’s Famed Rock Photo Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Jun
14
2023
Healthier Choices Management Corp. v. Philip Morris USA, Inc. No. 22-1268 (Fed. Cir. Apr. 12, 2023) Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Jun
16
2023
Supreme Court Rules “That Dog Don’t Hunt”: Bad Spaniels Toy’s Use of JACK DANIELS Marks is a Poor Parody and Dilution Act Applies Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Jun
21
2023
Generative AI and Patent Considerations – Part Two Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Jul
21
2023
Salazar v. AT&T Mobility LLC No. 21-2320 (Fed. Cir. Apr. 5, 2023) Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Aug
10
2023
Sanderling Management v. Snap Inc. No. 21-2173 (Fed. Cir. Apr. 12, 2023) Alice – 35 U.S.C. § 101 Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Dec
6
2013
$2.3 Million Trial Verdict Against Newegg Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Nov
28
2023
Guarding the Name of the Game: The Role of Lawyers in Safeguarding Athlete Trademarks Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Dec
10
2023
Federal Circuit’s Determination on Whether Fraudulent Conduct in Obtaining Incontestable Status Warrants the Mark’s Cancellation Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Feb
26
2024
Federal Circuit Concluded that Operating Manuals Subject to Confidentiality Restrictions are Prior Art Printed Publication Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Apr
10
2014
Intent To Use – It’s Not The Thought That Counts Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Mar
19
2024
Mind Your Audience: Disclosure of Confidential Information to AI Programs Can Give Rise to Trade Secret Misappropriation Claims Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Nov
22
2019
Don’t Wait Until There Is A Problem To Protect Your Trade Secrets November 2019 Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Mar
4
2020
Machine Learning Patentability in 2019: 5 Cases Analyzed and Lessons Learned Part 3 Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
May
5
2020
3M Takes Action to Protect Its Brand from Price Gouging And Trademark Infringement Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Aug
12
2014
Sham Hatch-Waxman Infringement Suits And FDA Citizen Petitions; A Potential For New Liability For Innovators? Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Jan
3
2017
New York Court of Appeals Says No Common Law Public Performance Right For Pre-1972 Sound Recordings Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Jul
16
2020
Federal Circuit Confirms Addition of Two Inventors of Groundbreaking Immunotherapies for Cancer Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
 

NLR Logo

We collaborate with the world's leading lawyers to deliver news tailored for you. Sign Up to receive our free e-Newsbulletins

 

Sign Up for e-NewsBulletins