Litigation

HB Ad Slot
HB Mobile Ad Slot

The National Law Review is a no-log-in resource of legal articles addressing litigation, trial practice, appellate practice, and alternative dispute resolution. We provide legal news on the most recent litigated business and commercial cases including antitrust, banking and financial institutions, construction, complex disputes/class actions involving multi-parties and multi-jurisdictions, communications, employment law, environmental actions, government enforcement defense, insurance, intellectual property, mergers and business combinations, products liability, professional liability, real estate and development, environmental, securities enforcement, white-collar criminal actions, and trust and estate litigation. Details of actions by federal and state and local regulatory agencies as well as private actions from across the U.S. are added daily.

The legal experts who write for the National Law Review cover the federal circuit courts as well as the Supreme Court, analyzing the decisions and opinions from the justices at these levels and parsing the meaning and greater context of these decisions.  For coverage of the circuit courts and the decisions at the Supreme Court, the National Law Review has breaking news coverage of these issues. Additionally, coverage of litigation as a process, including rules of evidence, jury selection, and information on expert witnesses is available on the site.

Along with traditional litigation, the National Law Review also covers alternate dispute resolution (ADR), as well as the viability of Arbitration Agreements in a variety of contexts. The benefits of mediation as opposed to litigation, and the benefits of arbitration.  Compulsory arbitration clauses in agreements relating to major corporations, shareholder agreements, or multinational agreements, are covered on the National Law Review.

Additionally, the National Law Review covers trends in -e-discovery and regulations in document analysis and trial preparation. 

We also serve as a resource for the latest developments in civil proceduree-discovery, trial practice, appellate practice, and alternative dispute resolution, including mediation and arbitration involving both binding adversarial proceedings and non-binding voluntary procedures before neutral third parties.

National Law Review Litigation & Class Action Law TwitterFor hourly updates on the latest news about Litigation, Class Action Law Suits, Appellate Rulings, TCPA, and more, be sure to follow our Litigation Law X (formerly Twitter) feed, and sign up for complimentary e-news bulletins.

Recent Litigation, Trial, ADR, E-Discovery & Court News

Title
Custom text Organization Sort descending
Feb
24
2015
A Negative Trend for Insureds: Federal Courts Apply Different Standards than State Courts when Determining Coverage Barnes & Thornburg LLP
Feb
7
2017
California Supreme Court Denies Insurance Industry’s Attempt to Deregulate Insurance in California Barnes & Thornburg LLP
Oct
17
2012
High Court Will Not Evaluate Whether Summary Judgment Orders Violate Plaintiffs’ Seventh Amendment Rights Barnes & Thornburg LLP
Jun
5
2019
The Importance of Graphics in Commercial Litigation Barnes & Thornburg LLP
Nov
1
2012
District Court Reverses and Holds That "Correct" Name, Not "Legal" Name, Required on UCC-1 Financing Statement Barnes & Thornburg LLP
Apr
6
2018
Could the Supreme Court's Lucia Argument Become A Cage Match? Barnes & Thornburg LLP
Oct
25
2023
SCOTUS Cert Recap: Two New Cases Address Retaliation for Free Speech Deference to Agencies Barnes & Thornburg LLP
Nov
11
2012
Health Care Providers Are Immune to Civil Liability, Despite Peer-Review Shortcomings, Federal Court Rules Barnes & Thornburg LLP
Mar
9
2015
More EEOC v. Abercrombie & Fitch: Why no Disability Accommodation Angle? Barnes & Thornburg LLP
Jun
30
2020
Ohio Appellate Court Rules That Insurer Must Defend Party Involved In Opioid MDL Barnes & Thornburg LLP
Feb
28
2017
What Judge Gorsuch as Associate Supreme Court Justice Could Mean for Product Liability Practitioners Barnes & Thornburg LLP
Apr
26
2018
When Is A Sexual Harassment Policy And Training Ineffective? Barnes & Thornburg LLP
Mar
5
2017
Indiana Appeals Court Finds Compliance With Industry Standards Not Relevant Barnes & Thornburg LLP
Jun
21
2021
Hot off the Press: Verdict Against Plaintiff in COVID-19 Leave Lawsuit Barnes & Thornburg LLP
Jul
11
2019
Federal De Minimis Rule Does Not Apply To California State Wage and Hour Claims Barnes & Thornburg LLP
Dec
30
2012
And the Hits Keep On Coming! NLRB Board Alters Approach on Witness Statements Barnes & Thornburg LLP
Jul
15
2020
PPP does not stand for ‘Personal Palace Purchase’ – Employee Alleges Whistleblower Retaliation Barnes & Thornburg LLP
Mar
16
2017
Sixth Circuit Refuses to Vacate; Lets Local Municipal Right-To-Work Decision Stand Barnes & Thornburg LLP
May
17
2018
Don’t Overthink It! Advocate for Easy to Understand Jury Instructions to Effectively Communicate Your Case Barnes & Thornburg LLP
Jun
18
2014
National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) Again Overturns Discharge of Starbucks Employee Who Engaged in a Profanity-Laced Argument with A Manager in Front of Customers Barnes & Thornburg LLP
Jul
23
2020
COVID-19 False Alarm Triggers Tipped Worker Collective Action Barnes & Thornburg LLP
Oct
5
2022
Supreme Court Agrees to Hear Case to Determine Whether NLRA Preempts State Law Tort Claims Barnes & Thornburg LLP
Feb
9
2013
Obama Administration Revises the Contraceptive Mandate, but Provides No Accommodations for For-Profit Companies with Religious Objections Barnes & Thornburg LLP
Jun
6
2018
Sixth Circuit Looks to Seventh and Ninth Circuits in Reviving Firefighters Title VII Suit against Union Barnes & Thornburg LLP
Mar
24
2016
Best Policy: Fifth Circuit Finds Prosecutorial Misconduct and Vindictiveness Barnes & Thornburg LLP
Jun
15
2018
Kentucky Supreme Court Doubles Down on Wrong Analysis of “Occurrence” Barnes & Thornburg LLP
Apr
30
2015
Unanimity and Clarity: US Supreme Court Outlines Standards For Judicial Review of EEOC Conciliation Barnes & Thornburg LLP
Jun
26
2018
Administrative Law Judge Upholds $4.3 Million Fine Against Texas Treatment and Research Center for HIPAA Violations Barnes & Thornburg LLP
 

NLR Logo

We collaborate with the world's leading lawyers to deliver news tailored for you. Sign Up to receive our free e-Newsbulletins

 

Sign Up for e-NewsBulletins