Intellectual Property

Intellectual property disputes take place on a daily basis in a variety of venues. From an employee’s right to a patent of company-developed products to patent wars between international companies for illegal use of a product/logo, the National Law Review is a great resource for updates on all things IP. The site covers litigation at the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) and the  Patent Trial and Board Appeals (PTAB), as well as cases in front of the International Trade Commission (ITC) for international patent disputes. The National Law Review covers cases heard by the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS), or appeals which are now sitting in front of the patent-board on Inter partes review (IPR). Additionally, the National Law Review covers cases and decisions of the Federal Trade Commission (FTC).

Copyrights, patent infringement claims, trade secrets, false advertising claims, unfair competition, and intellectual property laws which govern patent-litigation, are all areas which the National Law Review covers, in detail for readers. Patent disputes don’t only occur in the United States. When international countries including the United Kingdom, Brazil, China, India, and the European Union get involved, international laws are also taken into consideration by the PTO. Additionally, information on how to obtain patent protection internationally is also available on the National Law Review.

Intellectual property news on the National Law Review spans from topics including biosimilars, domain name registration, generic top-level domains (gTLDs), drug patents, non-compete agreements, trade secrets, and other industry-related battles which ensue, are covered on the site. Visitors can read about the latest legislation, laws, and news, as it relates to patents and intellectual property in general. Further, visitors to the National Law Review are going to find the latest stories and litigation as it unfolds in front of patent courts across the land. From email and data retention policies, patent disputes over medical devices, cloud computing and artificial intelligence the National Law Review has the details and expert intellectual property litigation legal analysis readers count on.

For hourly updates on the latest news about Intellectual Property Law, IP Litigation, Patent Legislation, and more, be sure to follow our IP Law Twitter feed, and sign up for complimentary e-news bulletins.

Custom text Title Organization Sort descending
Dec
10
2023
Cyntec Company, Ltd. v. Chilisin Electronics Corp., Chilisin America Ltd. Nos. 2022-1873, (Fed. Cir. October 16, 2023) Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Mar
30
2016
Patent Trial and Appeal Board Institutes 17 Inter Partes Reviews for TCL Communication Technology Holdings Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Dec
21
2023
Federal Circuit Affirms PTAB’s Ruling of Obviousness for the Colorization of Fabrics Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Feb
21
2024
AI-Assisted Inventions: Is There a Duty to Disclose the Use of AI? Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
May
5
2016
Rah! Rah! Sis Boom Bah! Supreme Court to Decide Whether Copyright Act Protects Cheerleader Uniform Designs Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
May
9
2016
Defend Trade Secrets Act – Coming to Federal Court Near You Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Mar
28
2024
Bid Protest Hub – February 2024 Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Apr
8
2024
2023 Federal Circuit Case Summaries Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Mar
17
2020
Federal Circuit Makes It More Difficult for Accused Infringers to File Declaratory Judgment Actions Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Mar
31
2020
Machine Learning Patentability in 2019: 5 Cases Analyzed and Lessons Learned Part 5 Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
May
27
2020
3D-Printed Masks, Disinfecting Devices, and Simplified Ventilators – a Sampling of Tech Advances in the Age of COVID-19 from California Universities Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Jul
14
2014
International Safe Harbor Privacy Compliance: What You Need to Know Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Aug
21
2014
Second Circuit Clarifies the Use of Legal Presumptions of Consumer Confusion and Injury in Certain Lanham Act Cases Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Sep
23
2020
Why Patents Can Matter In Trade Secret Cases Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Feb
23
2017
Illinois Federal Judge Awards Treble Damages and Attorneys’ Fees in Kurt Vonnegut-Fueled Opinion Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Jan
15
2021
The China Pivot: Closing the “Back Door” to Trade Secret and IP Theft Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
May
23
2017
Supreme Court Unanimously Changes Where Patents May Be Litigated Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Aug
31
2021
Nota Bene Episode 141: Artificial Intelligence Technologies: Past, Present, and Forward with Siraj Husain [PODCAST] Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Mar
3
2011
Brands and Video Games: Three Steps for Finding a Perfect Match Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Nov
22
2021
Benefits and Considerations for Patent Prosecution under Patent Prosecution Highway in the U.S., Europe, China, and Singapore Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Dec
20
2021
Benefits and Considerations for Patent Prosecution Under Patent Prosecution Highway in Australia, Canada, South Korea, and Japan Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Jun
12
2011
Patent Holder Takes a Shot at Nintendo over DSi Cameras Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Jan
17
2018
Patent Strategies for Cryptocurrencies and Blockchain Technology Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Oct
12
2015
August 2015 Summary of Recent Precedential Trademark Trial and Appeal Board Decisions Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
May
27
2023
Supreme Court Finds Warhol’s Commercial Licensing of “Orange Prince” to Vanity Fair Is Not Fair Use and Infringes Goldsmith’s Famed Rock Photo Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Jun
14
2023
Healthier Choices Management Corp. v. Philip Morris USA, Inc. No. 22-1268 (Fed. Cir. Apr. 12, 2023) Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Jun
16
2023
Supreme Court Rules “That Dog Don’t Hunt”: Bad Spaniels Toy’s Use of JACK DANIELS Marks is a Poor Parody and Dilution Act Applies Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Jun
21
2023
Generative AI and Patent Considerations – Part Two Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Jul
21
2023
Salazar v. AT&T Mobility LLC No. 21-2320 (Fed. Cir. Apr. 5, 2023) Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Jul
2
2013
Foreign Trade Antitrust Improvements Act Defeats Claim Against Holder Of Patent Incorporated Into Industry Standard Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Aug
10
2023
Sanderling Management v. Snap Inc. No. 21-2173 (Fed. Cir. Apr. 12, 2023) Alice – 35 U.S.C. § 101 Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Mar
12
2016
Second Circuit Tosses Out Time-Barred Copyright Claims Against Jay Z Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Nov
28
2023
Guarding the Name of the Game: The Role of Lawyers in Safeguarding Athlete Trademarks Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Mar
29
2016
T.T.A.B. Emphasizes the Fame of the Movie ‘Jaws’ in Its Refusal to Register a Cooking Show’s Mark Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Dec
10
2023
Federal Circuit’s Determination on Whether Fraudulent Conduct in Obtaining Incontestable Status Warrants the Mark’s Cancellation Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
 

NLR Logo

We collaborate with the world's leading lawyers to deliver news tailored for you. Sign Up to receive our free e-Newsbulletins

 

Sign Up for e-NewsBulletins