Nov 24 2014 |
Versata Software, Inc. v. Callidus Software, Inc.: Guidance on Stays Pending Post-Issuance Proceedings |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Jun 29 2021 |
Is Lawful Possession of a Trade Secret Enough for Standing to Sue for Misappropriation? |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Sep 16 2010 |
ITAR License Exemption Amended To Allow Hand-Carrying Of Technical Data Outside The United States |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Oct 15 2021 |
Trade Secret Misappropriation: Denial of Motion for Attorneys’ Fees under CUTSA is Not an Appealable Order |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Apr 11 2011 |
Protecting Trade Secrets In A Post-WikiLeaks World |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
May 18 2015 |
There’s No Such Thing As a Free Sample |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Mar 2 2022 |
Money Laundering and High-Value Art: Treasury’s Study Discusses Financial Crimes and NFTs |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Dec 21 2011 |
Court of Federal Claims Reaffirms Exceptions To The Anti-Assignment Act |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Jun 23 2015 |
The Days of the Vultures (Silicon Valley – Season 2 Finale) |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Apr 14 2022 |
Tokenization and the Law: Legal Issues with NFTs |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Mar 27 2018 |
UPDATE: The Federal Defend Trade Secrets Act vs. The California Uniform Trade Secrets Act |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Feb 11 2023 |
Early 2023 Update: Where Are Plaintiffs Filing Patent Cases Now? |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Mar 15 2023 |
Copyright Office Guidance on AI |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Apr 13 2023 |
Copyright Office Artificial Intelligence Initiative and Resource Guide |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Jun 27 2013 |
Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) Goes Down - Copyright Goes Up - U.S. v. Windsor, Supreme Court, No. 12-307, Decided June 26, 2013 |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Aug 7 2013 |
Beijing Higher People's Court Clarifies Usage of Consent Letters to Overcome Trademark Rejections in the People's Republic of China (PRC) |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Aug 31 2023 |
Inguran, LLC, DBA STGenetics V. ABS Global, INC., Genius PLC, No. 2022-1385 (July 5, 2023) |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Apr 5 2019 |
Do NOT Give NDAs the Short Shrift |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Oct 17 2023 |
United Cannabis Corporation v. Pure Hemp Collective Inc. |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Oct 24 2023 |
In Re: Cellect, LLC No. 2022-1293 (Fed. Cir. Aug. 28, 2023) |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Dec 31 2013 |
A Short-Lived Victory for Generic Manufacturers? – Part 2 |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Dec 18 2023 |
Federal Circuit Vacates Invalidity Judgement Based on Collateral Estoppel from a Case Subsequently Vacated and Rebukes Plaintiff’s About-Face on Its Stipulated Claim Construction |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Dec 21 2023 |
Anticipation and Obviousness in Patent Law: An Analysis of Recent IPR Decisions |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Feb 14 2024 |
Federal Circuit Rules on Inventor-as-Lexicographer Definitions and the Proper Scope of Reply and Sur-Reply Briefing Following Patent Owner Responses to IPR Institution Decisions |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
May 25 2016 |
Federal Circuit Finds Software-Related Claims Patent Eligible in Enfish v. Microsoft Corp. |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Dec 6 2019 |
Left Empty Handed: Value Shut Down on Written Prior Art, Highlighting Importance of System Art |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Jan 7 2020 |
Artificial Intelligence (AI) Patents – Will the Patent Office Change the Rules? |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
May 10 2024 |
How to Recover Attorneys’ Fees in a Schedule A Trademark Case in the Northern District of Illinois |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Mar 25 2020 |
COVID-19 and Trade Secrets: Is Your Business Prepared to Protect its Trade Secrets While Your Employees Work From Home? |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Apr 9 2020 |
4 Steps to More Effectively Use NDAs to Protect Confidential Information |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Apr 16 2020 |
Delaware 101 Pleading Analysis Leaves Parties Guessing and Prosecutors Moving to Adapt |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Oct 14 2016 |
Proposed New FDA Labeling Rules Would Result in Increased Generic Drug Product Liability Claims |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Aug 14 2020 |
Ixchel v. Biogen: California B2B Noncompetes Do Not Per Se Violate B&P Section 16600, and Are Instead Subject to Rule of Reason |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Mar 27 2017 |
Who’s Got the Spirit?! Supreme Court Decides Star Athletic v. Varsity Brands; New Two-Part Test Seeks to Clear Up “Mess” But Questions Still Remain About Subjective Nature of Separability Analysis |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Jan 5 2021 |
California Court Strikes Down Overbroad Confidentiality Agreement as a de facto Non-Compete |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |