Intellectual Property

Intellectual property disputes take place on a daily basis in a variety of venues. From an employee’s right to a patent of company-developed products to patent wars between international companies for illegal use of a product/logo, the National Law Review is a great resource for updates on all things IP. The site covers litigation at the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) and the  Patent Trial and Board Appeals (PTAB), as well as cases in front of the International Trade Commission (ITC) for international patent disputes. The National Law Review covers cases heard by the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS), or appeals which are now sitting in front of the patent-board on Inter partes review (IPR). Additionally, the National Law Review covers cases and decisions of the Federal Trade Commission (FTC).

Copyrights, patent infringement claims, trade secrets, false advertising claims, unfair competition, and intellectual property laws which govern patent-litigation, are all areas which the National Law Review covers, in detail for readers. Patent disputes don’t only occur in the United States. When international countries including the United Kingdom, Brazil, China, India, and the European Union get involved, international laws are also taken into consideration by the PTO. Additionally, information on how to obtain patent protection internationally is also available on the National Law Review.

Intellectual property news on the National Law Review spans from topics including biosimilars, domain name registration, generic top-level domains (gTLDs), drug patents, non-compete agreements, trade secrets, and other industry-related battles which ensue, are covered on the site. Visitors can read about the latest legislation, laws, and news, as it relates to patents and intellectual property in general. Further, visitors to the National Law Review are going to find the latest stories and litigation as it unfolds in front of patent courts across the land. From email and data retention policies, patent disputes over medical devices, cloud computing and artificial intelligence the National Law Review has the details and expert intellectual property litigation legal analysis readers count on.

For hourly updates on the latest news about Intellectual Property Law, IP Litigation, Patent Legislation, and more, be sure to follow our IP Law Twitter feed, and sign up for complimentary e-news bulletins.

Custom text Title Organization Sort descending
Nov
24
2014
Versata Software, Inc. v. Callidus Software, Inc.: Guidance on Stays Pending Post-Issuance Proceedings Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Jun
29
2021
Is Lawful Possession of a Trade Secret Enough for Standing to Sue for Misappropriation? Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Sep
16
2010
ITAR License Exemption Amended To Allow Hand-Carrying Of Technical Data Outside The United States Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Oct
15
2021
Trade Secret Misappropriation: Denial of Motion for Attorneys’ Fees under CUTSA is Not an Appealable Order Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Apr
11
2011
Protecting Trade Secrets In A Post-WikiLeaks World Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
May
18
2015
There’s No Such Thing As a Free Sample Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Mar
2
2022
Money Laundering and High-Value Art: Treasury’s Study Discusses Financial Crimes and NFTs Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Dec
21
2011
Court of Federal Claims Reaffirms Exceptions To The Anti-Assignment Act Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Jun
23
2015
The Days of the Vultures (Silicon Valley – Season 2 Finale) Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Apr
14
2022
Tokenization and the Law: Legal Issues with NFTs Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Mar
27
2018
UPDATE: The Federal Defend Trade Secrets Act vs. The California Uniform Trade Secrets Act Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Feb
11
2023
Early 2023 Update: Where Are Plaintiffs Filing Patent Cases Now? Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Mar
15
2023
Copyright Office Guidance on AI Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Apr
13
2023
Copyright Office Artificial Intelligence Initiative and Resource Guide Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Jun
27
2013
Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) Goes Down - Copyright Goes Up - U.S. v. Windsor, Supreme Court, No. 12-307, Decided June 26, 2013 Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Aug
7
2013
Beijing Higher People's Court Clarifies Usage of Consent Letters to Overcome Trademark Rejections in the People's Republic of China (PRC) Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Aug
31
2023
Inguran, LLC, DBA STGenetics V. ABS Global, INC., Genius PLC, No. 2022-1385 (July 5, 2023) Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Apr
5
2019
Do NOT Give NDAs the Short Shrift Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Oct
17
2023
United Cannabis Corporation v. Pure Hemp Collective Inc. Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Oct
24
2023
In Re: Cellect, LLC No. 2022-1293 (Fed. Cir. Aug. 28, 2023) Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Dec
31
2013
A Short-Lived Victory for Generic Manufacturers? – Part 2 Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Dec
18
2023
Federal Circuit Vacates Invalidity Judgement Based on Collateral Estoppel from a Case Subsequently Vacated and Rebukes Plaintiff’s About-Face on Its Stipulated Claim Construction Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Dec
21
2023
Anticipation and Obviousness in Patent Law: An Analysis of Recent IPR Decisions Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Feb
14
2024
Federal Circuit Rules on Inventor-as-Lexicographer Definitions and the Proper Scope of Reply and Sur-Reply Briefing Following Patent Owner Responses to IPR Institution Decisions Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
May
25
2016
Federal Circuit Finds Software-Related Claims Patent Eligible in Enfish v. Microsoft Corp. Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Dec
6
2019
Left Empty Handed: Value Shut Down on Written Prior Art, Highlighting Importance of System Art Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Jan
7
2020
Artificial Intelligence (AI) Patents – Will the Patent Office Change the Rules? Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
May
10
2024
How to Recover Attorneys’ Fees in a Schedule A Trademark Case in the Northern District of Illinois Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Mar
25
2020
COVID-19 and Trade Secrets: Is Your Business Prepared to Protect its Trade Secrets While Your Employees Work From Home? Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Apr
9
2020
4 Steps to More Effectively Use NDAs to Protect Confidential Information Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Apr
16
2020
Delaware 101 Pleading Analysis Leaves Parties Guessing and Prosecutors Moving to Adapt Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Oct
14
2016
Proposed New FDA Labeling Rules Would Result in Increased Generic Drug Product Liability Claims Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Aug
14
2020
Ixchel v. Biogen: California B2B Noncompetes Do Not Per Se Violate B&P Section 16600, and Are Instead Subject to Rule of Reason Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Mar
27
2017
Who’s Got the Spirit?! Supreme Court Decides Star Athletic v. Varsity Brands; New Two-Part Test Seeks to Clear Up “Mess” But Questions Still Remain About Subjective Nature of Separability Analysis Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Jan
5
2021
California Court Strikes Down Overbroad Confidentiality Agreement as a de facto Non-Compete Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
 

NLR Logo

We collaborate with the world's leading lawyers to deliver news tailored for you. Sign Up to receive our free e-Newsbulletins

 

Sign Up for e-NewsBulletins