Intellectual Property

Intellectual property disputes take place on a daily basis in a variety of venues. From an employee’s right to a patent of company-developed products to patent wars between international companies for illegal use of a product/logo, the National Law Review is a great resource for updates on all things IP. The site covers litigation at the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) and the  Patent Trial and Board Appeals (PTAB), as well as cases in front of the International Trade Commission (ITC) for international patent disputes. The National Law Review covers cases heard by the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS), or appeals which are now sitting in front of the patent-board on Inter partes review (IPR). Additionally, the National Law Review covers cases and decisions of the Federal Trade Commission (FTC).

Copyrights, patent infringement claims, trade secrets, false advertising claims, unfair competition, and intellectual property laws which govern patent-litigation, are all areas which the National Law Review covers, in detail for readers. Patent disputes don’t only occur in the United States. When international countries including the United Kingdom, Brazil, China, India, and the European Union get involved, international laws are also taken into consideration by the PTO. Additionally, information on how to obtain patent protection internationally is also available on the National Law Review.

Intellectual property news on the National Law Review spans from topics including biosimilars, domain name registration, generic top-level domains (gTLDs), drug patents, non-compete agreements, trade secrets, and other industry-related battles which ensue, are covered on the site. Visitors can read about the latest legislation, laws, and news, as it relates to patents and intellectual property in general. Further, visitors to the National Law Review are going to find the latest stories and litigation as it unfolds in front of patent courts across the land. From email and data retention policies, patent disputes over medical devices, cloud computing and artificial intelligence the National Law Review has the details and expert intellectual property litigation legal analysis readers count on.

For hourly updates on the latest news about Intellectual Property Law, IP Litigation, Patent Legislation, and more, be sure to follow our IP Law Twitter feed, and sign up for complimentary e-news bulletins.

Custom text Title Sort descending Organization
Aug
5
2012
A Substantial Non-Infringing Use Does Not Preclude a Finding of Inducement McDermott Will & Emery
Dec
2
2015
A Substantially Pure Isomer Is Obvious When the Completely Pure Isomer Is Known In The Art: Spectrum Pharms., Inc. v. Sandoz Inc. McDermott Will & Emery
May
29
2015
A Sucking Sound on Domain Names: .SUCKS is Open for Registration Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLP
May
5
2023
A Suit Over Seeds is Sprouting in Missouri Norris McLaughlin P.A.
Mar
10
2012
A Surprise to No One; Means-Plus-Function Claim Elements Are Limited by Disclosed Embodiments McDermott Will & Emery
Jun
4
2017
A Survey of Drone Patent Activity Polsinelli PC
Sep
30
2021
A Tale of Two Authors: Determining Ownership Rights of Novels Adapted for Theatre McDermott Will & Emery
May
16
2013
A Tale of Two Patent Litigation Stays Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Aug
10
2023
A Textbook Example: Single Online Sale Does Not a Minimum Contact Make McDermott Will & Emery
Jul
19
2022
A Third Surge in Innovation and Patents on Hydrogen Fuel Cell Vehicles Foley & Lardner LLP
Dec
4
2023
A Thorny Issue Resolved as “Flowers for All” Trademark Deemed Distinctive K&L Gates
Sep
17
2021
A Trademark by Any Other Name: Why the UGG Brand Left Some Australians Saying “Ugh” Norris McLaughlin P.A.
Oct
17
2018
A Tune of Modernity: The Music Modernization Act Brinks Gilson & Lione
Mar
5
2019
A Unanimous Supreme Court Decides — If Your Copyright Registration Application is Still Pending, You Cannot Sue for Infringement Davis|Kuelthau, s.c.
May
17
2012
A Unique Arbitrary Word Mark Does Not Lose Strength as Trademark when Identified Along with Manufacturer McDermott Will & Emery
Mar
2
2018
A Vibration Dampener Fails Mayo/Alice Test in D. Delaware – Is the Decision as Shaky as it Seems? Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Oct
5
2014
A Warehouse Full of Unapproved Genetically-Modified Seeds; Now What?, Syngenta Seeds, Inc. v. Bunge North America, Inc. McDermott Will & Emery
Feb
15
2021
A Welcome Proposal to Introduce a Grace Period Into the Australian Designs Act K&L Gates
Jan
28
2017
A White House Executive Order May Affect Validity of Privacy Shield Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLP
Dec
21
2021
A Whole Lot of “Cobbl[e]”-ty Gook After Wertheim Finnegan
Jul
21
2015
A Win for Licensees: Royalty Payments Stop at Patent’s Expiration Wilson Elser Moskowitz Edelman & Dicker LLP
Nov
26
2019
A Win for Patent Inventors: 13 Year Battle Between Shanks and Unilever Draws to a Close Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLP
Dec
20
2023
A Win for Skinny Labels: Insights for Enforcing Use Patents Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLP
Oct
9
2019
A Win is a Win! K&L Gates
Apr
26
2019
A Window into PTAB Derivation Proceedings McDermott Will & Emery
Sep
15
2022
A Window into Trade Secret Damages: R&D Costs Can Quantify Unjust Enrichment McDermott Will & Emery
Jul
21
2022
A Work of Art? Ninth Circuit Analyzes Foreign Judgments and Fair Use McDermott Will & Emery
Jul
8
2018
A [Temporary] Defeat for Copyright at the European Parliament K&L Gates
Jun
18
2015
A ‘Clothes’ Call: Anticipating IP Issues in Partnerships Lewis Roca Rothgerber LLP
Feb
12
2021
A “Culture Of Concealment” – Scrutinizing Overbroad NDAs Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Mar
30
2020
A “Dark Horse” Victory for Katy Perry: Central District of California Overturns $2.8M Copyright Verdict Proskauer Rose LLP
Apr
10
2020
A “Printed Publication” in a Pending Patent Application May Not Be a “Printed Publication” in an IPR Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLP
Mar
28
2014
A “Program” Is Just a Set of Instructions McDermott Will & Emery
Oct
21
2014
A.C. Dispensing Equipment Inc. v. Prince Castle LLC: Denying Motion to Conduct Re-Examination of Witness IPR2014-00511 Faegre Drinker
Oct
24
2014
A.C. Dispensing Equipment Inc. v. Prince Castle LLC: Denying Request for Permission to File Motion to Stay Prosecution of Pending Continuation Application IPR2014-00511 Faegre Drinker
 

NLR Logo

We collaborate with the world's leading lawyers to deliver news tailored for you. Sign Up to receive our free e-Newsbulletins

 

Sign Up for e-NewsBulletins