Intellectual Property

Intellectual property disputes take place on a daily basis in a variety of venues. From an employee’s right to a patent of company-developed products to patent wars between international companies for illegal use of a product/logo, the National Law Review is a great resource for updates on all things IP. The site covers litigation at the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) and the  Patent Trial and Board Appeals (PTAB), as well as cases in front of the International Trade Commission (ITC) for international patent disputes. The National Law Review covers cases heard by the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS), or appeals which are now sitting in front of the patent-board on Inter partes review (IPR). Additionally, the National Law Review covers cases and decisions of the Federal Trade Commission (FTC).

Copyrights, patent infringement claims, trade secrets, false advertising claims, unfair competition, and intellectual property laws which govern patent-litigation, are all areas which the National Law Review covers, in detail for readers. Patent disputes don’t only occur in the United States. When international countries including the United Kingdom, Brazil, China, India, and the European Union get involved, international laws are also taken into consideration by the PTO. Additionally, information on how to obtain patent protection internationally is also available on the National Law Review.

Intellectual property news on the National Law Review spans from topics including biosimilars, domain name registration, generic top-level domains (gTLDs), drug patents, non-compete agreements, trade secrets, and other industry-related battles which ensue, are covered on the site. Visitors can read about the latest legislation, laws, and news, as it relates to patents and intellectual property in general. Further, visitors to the National Law Review are going to find the latest stories and litigation as it unfolds in front of patent courts across the land. From email and data retention policies, patent disputes over medical devices, cloud computing and artificial intelligence the National Law Review has the details and expert intellectual property litigation legal analysis readers count on.

For hourly updates on the latest news about Intellectual Property Law, IP Litigation, Patent Legislation, and more, be sure to follow our IP Law Twitter feed, and sign up for complimentary e-news bulletins.

Custom text Title Organization Sort descending
Jun
28
2023
How Quickly are Judge Albright Patent Cases Going to Trial? Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Jun
21
2013
Four Wheel Fashion Re: Lifestyle Branding & Trademark Law Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
May
8
2019
Converting an IPR Loss into a District Court Win Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Dec
10
2023
Axonics, Inc. v. Medtronic, Inc. Nos. 2022-1532, 2022-1533, (Fed. Cir. August 7, 2023) Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Dec
18
2023
Federal Circuit Clarifies Standards to Establish Nexus Between Objective Evidence and Non-Obviousness, and to Establish Copying in Medtronic et al. v. Teleflex Innovations Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Dec
21
2023
“Comparison Prior Art” Must Be Tied to the Same Article of Manufacture as That Claimed Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Apr
19
2024
Divided 9th Circuit Says District Court Has Power to Adjudicate TM Applications Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Feb
13
2020
Machine Learning Patentability in 2019: 5 Cases Analyzed and Lessons Learned Part 1 Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Jun
20
2016
Federal Circuit Affirms Refusal to Register “Churrascos” Based on Genericness, Despite Prior Federal Registration of the Mark Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Apr
22
2020
The Federal Circuit Reconsiders the Inherent Distinctiveness of Color Marks in In re Forney Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
May
19
2020
COVID-19 Web-Based IP Platform to Facilitate Connections Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Oct
8
2020
Alice and Incongruity in PTAB Appeals Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Feb
5
2021
Cementing Victory by Accepting Defeat: When Can a Patentee’s Infringement Disclaimer Moot an Appeal of an IPR Decision? Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Nov
8
2014
FTC Proposes Consent Order to Settle Charges Alleging Misrepresentations by Patent Assertion Entity Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Apr
27
2021
Activision Files Lawsuit Over the Rights to Use the Word Warzone in the Call Of Duty Series Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Sep
21
2021
NFT License Breakdown: Exploring Different Marketplaces and Associated License Issues Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Sep
7
2009
Cairns Patent Once Again Provokes the Promotions Industry to Re-Evaluate Online Promotional Games Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Dec
29
2010
Patent Exhaustion Doctrine in China Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Apr
26
2011
Frankenstein's Monster: Data Rights Changes Adopted In The National Defense Authorization Act For Fiscal Year 2011 Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Jun
6
2015
Board Games (Silicon Valley, Episode 16) Board Seats and Board Composition Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Aug
29
2022
Insufficient Evidence: Fifth Circuit Affirms Denial of Preliminary Injunction for Trade Secret Misappropriation Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Oct
25
2022
The Developing “Avoided Costs” Remedy in Trade Secret Litigation Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
May
18
2023
Solving Open Source Problems with AI Code Generators – Legal Issues and Solutions, Part 1 Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Jun
29
2023
Ninth Circuit Slashes Exorbitant Attorney’s Fee Award That Would “Make the Average Person Shake Her Head in Disbelief” Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Jul
27
2023
State Privacy Law Roundup: What Retailers Need to Know Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Aug
3
2023
Sanofi-Aventis Deutschlan GMBH v. Mylan Pharmaceuticals Inc. Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Dec
10
2023
Cyntec Company, Ltd. v. Chilisin Electronics Corp., Chilisin America Ltd. Nos. 2022-1873, (Fed. Cir. October 16, 2023) Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Dec
21
2023
Federal Circuit Affirms PTAB’s Ruling of Obviousness for the Colorization of Fabrics Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Feb
21
2024
AI-Assisted Inventions: Is There a Duty to Disclose the Use of AI? Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Mar
28
2024
Bid Protest Hub – February 2024 Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Apr
8
2024
2023 Federal Circuit Case Summaries Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
May
24
2024
Tennessee’s ELVIS Act Incorporates AI Considerations into Right of Publicity Protections Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Mar
17
2020
Federal Circuit Makes It More Difficult for Accused Infringers to File Declaratory Judgment Actions Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Mar
31
2020
Machine Learning Patentability in 2019: 5 Cases Analyzed and Lessons Learned Part 5 Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Jul
6
2016
National Cancer Moonshot: USPTO Cancer Immunotherapy Fast Track Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
 

NLR Logo

We collaborate with the world's leading lawyers to deliver news tailored for you. Sign Up to receive our free e-Newsbulletins

 

Sign Up for e-NewsBulletins