Intellectual Property

Intellectual property disputes take place on a daily basis in a variety of venues. From an employee’s right to a patent of company-developed products to patent wars between international companies for illegal use of a product/logo, the National Law Review is a great resource for updates on all things IP. The site covers litigation at the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) and the  Patent Trial and Board Appeals (PTAB), as well as cases in front of the International Trade Commission (ITC) for international patent disputes. The National Law Review covers cases heard by the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS), or appeals which are now sitting in front of the patent-board on Inter partes review (IPR). Additionally, the National Law Review covers cases and decisions of the Federal Trade Commission (FTC).

Copyrights, patent infringement claims, trade secrets, false advertising claims, unfair competition, and intellectual property laws which govern patent-litigation, are all areas which the National Law Review covers, in detail for readers. Patent disputes don’t only occur in the United States. When international countries including the United Kingdom, Brazil, China, India, and the European Union get involved, international laws are also taken into consideration by the PTO. Additionally, information on how to obtain patent protection internationally is also available on the National Law Review.

Intellectual property news on the National Law Review spans from topics including biosimilars, domain name registration, generic top-level domains (gTLDs), drug patents, non-compete agreements, trade secrets, and other industry-related battles which ensue, are covered on the site. Visitors can read about the latest legislation, laws, and news, as it relates to patents and intellectual property in general. Further, visitors to the National Law Review are going to find the latest stories and litigation as it unfolds in front of patent courts across the land. From email and data retention policies, patent disputes over medical devices, cloud computing and artificial intelligence the National Law Review has the details and expert intellectual property litigation legal analysis readers count on.

For hourly updates on the latest news about Intellectual Property Law, IP Litigation, Patent Legislation, and more, be sure to follow our IP Law Twitter feed, and sign up for complimentary e-news bulletins.

Custom text Title Organization Sort descending
Oct
23
2017
PTAB Sheds Light on Video Game Patent Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Sep
29
2022
Takeaways From the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office’s Artificial Intelligence and Emerging Technologies Partnership Series – Part One of Three Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Mar
2
2018
An Uphill Battle Protecting Fashion Designs In Nigeria and Abroad Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Jun
21
2023
Training AI Models – Just Because It’s Your Data Doesn’t Mean You Can Use It Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Jun
23
2023
Senators Propose New Legislation to Clarify Patent Eligibility Under 35 U.S.C. § 101 Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Jun
27
2013
Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) Goes Down - Copyright Goes Up - U.S. v. Windsor, Supreme Court, No. 12-307, Decided June 26, 2013 Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Aug
7
2013
Beijing Higher People's Court Clarifies Usage of Consent Letters to Overcome Trademark Rejections in the People's Republic of China (PRC) Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Dec
21
2023
Pharmaceutical Companies Have Rights if the Federal Government Seized their Patents Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Dec
31
2013
A Short-Lived Victory for Generic Manufacturers? – Part 2 Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Feb
26
2024
Federal Circuit Rules on When the Patent Trial and Appeal Board Is Engaging in Erroneous Claim Construction Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Nov
22
2019
Don’t Wait Until There Is A Problem To Protect Your Trade Secrets November 2019 Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Mar
31
2024
Highlights of Revised Regulations for Implementing Patent Law of China Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
May
25
2016
Federal Circuit Finds Software-Related Claims Patent Eligible in Enfish v. Microsoft Corp. Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Mar
4
2020
Machine Learning Patentability in 2019: 5 Cases Analyzed and Lessons Learned Part 3 Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
May
5
2020
3M Takes Action to Protect Its Brand from Price Gouging And Trademark Infringement Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Oct
14
2016
Proposed New FDA Labeling Rules Would Result in Increased Generic Drug Product Liability Claims Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Jul
16
2020
Federal Circuit Confirms Addition of Two Inventors of Groundbreaking Immunotherapies for Cancer Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Jan
25
2017
Suing The United States Government For Patent Infringement And Defending Against A Claim Of Obviousness Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Oct
14
2020
Supreme Court Deciding Constitutionality of PTAB Judge Appointments Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Feb
2
2021
Trademark Modernization Act Strengthens Rights of Trademark Owners Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Mar
29
2021
Distinguish “Smart Contract” From Abstract Idea To Pass Blockchain Patentability Scrutiny Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Apr
28
2021
Employee Confidentiality Provisions: Overbreadth Can Lead to Under-Protection Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Jan
26
2015
Teva v. Sandoz (USSC) – Standard for Appellate Review of Claim Construction Rulings Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Aug
28
2009
Brave New Web: Trademark Rights in the Expanding Internet Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Dec
9
2010
Adjusting the Inequitable Conduct Doctrine: Federal Circuit Hears Oral Arguments En Banc in Therasense Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Mar
9
2022
Forum Selection Clause Can Preclude PTO Validity Challenges Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Jan
12
2023
Protecting Semiconductor Chip Design under the Semiconductor Chip Protection Act of 1984 (SCPA) – Part I (Registration and Inspection) Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Jan
17
2013
In a Rarely-Seen Joint-Effort in the Competition Arena, the DOJ and the USPTO Unite in Issuing a Policy Statement on Remedies Involving Standard Essential Patents Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Jan
25
2013
Thin Copyrights - Protected But Not Infringed Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Feb
5
2019
Failure to Launch: Not Identifying the Proper Parties Can Prematurely End an Video Game IPR Challenge Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Mar
19
2019
Blockchain Games and Collectibles – Patents and Other Legal Issues Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Jul
15
2013
The Architecture of Copyright Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Dec
10
2023
Federal Circuit Vacates PTAB’s Decision Based on an Overly Narrow Claim Construction Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Nov
18
2013
No Avoiding BPCIA (Biologics Price Competition and Innovation Act) For Biosimilars: No Patent Declaratory Judgment Action Before Biosimilars Application Is Filed Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Jan
22
2024
The Importance of Reasonable Particularity in a Doctrine of Equivalents Argument Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
 

NLR Logo

We collaborate with the world's leading lawyers to deliver news tailored for you. Sign Up to receive our free e-Newsbulletins

 

Sign Up for e-NewsBulletins