Intellectual Property

Intellectual property disputes take place on a daily basis in a variety of venues. From an employee’s right to a patent of company-developed products to patent wars between international companies for illegal use of a product/logo, the National Law Review is a great resource for updates on all things IP. The site covers litigation at the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) and the  Patent Trial and Board Appeals (PTAB), as well as cases in front of the International Trade Commission (ITC) for international patent disputes. The National Law Review covers cases heard by the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS), or appeals which are now sitting in front of the patent-board on Inter partes review (IPR). Additionally, the National Law Review covers cases and decisions of the Federal Trade Commission (FTC).

Copyrights, patent infringement claims, trade secrets, false advertising claims, unfair competition, and intellectual property laws which govern patent-litigation, are all areas which the National Law Review covers, in detail for readers. Patent disputes don’t only occur in the United States. When international countries including the United Kingdom, Brazil, China, India, and the European Union get involved, international laws are also taken into consideration by the PTO. Additionally, information on how to obtain patent protection internationally is also available on the National Law Review.

Intellectual property news on the National Law Review spans from topics including biosimilars, domain name registration, generic top-level domains (gTLDs), drug patents, non-compete agreements, trade secrets, and other industry-related battles which ensue, are covered on the site. Visitors can read about the latest legislation, laws, and news, as it relates to patents and intellectual property in general. Further, visitors to the National Law Review are going to find the latest stories and litigation as it unfolds in front of patent courts across the land. From email and data retention policies, patent disputes over medical devices, cloud computing and artificial intelligence the National Law Review has the details and expert intellectual property litigation legal analysis readers count on.

For hourly updates on the latest news about Intellectual Property Law, IP Litigation, Patent Legislation, and more, be sure to follow our IP Law Twitter feed, and sign up for complimentary e-news bulletins.

Custom text Title Sort descending Organization
Mar
15
2024
Accelerated Patent Grant (APG) Program Between IMPI and USPTO OLIVARES
Dec
4
2012
Acceleron Asserts its '021 Patent Against Dell, Inc. Womble Bond Dickinson (US) LLP
Aug
30
2019
Accessibility, not Access is Proper Legal Touchstone for § 102(B) McDermott Will & Emery
Sep
18
2015
Accord and Apotex and Amneal and Teva Pharmaceutical et. al. v. Daiichi Sankyo Co: Granting Institution of Inter Partes Review Over Objection that All Real Parties-in-Interest Were Not Identified Faegre Drinker
Jan
11
2021
Accusation of Chinese Patent Infringement Leads to Slander Lawsuit Victory Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Nov
2
2015
Accused Infringer Rides Antitrust Roller Coaster in Magnetar Technologies v. Intamin McDermott Will & Emery
Oct
4
2016
Accused Infringer Secures Patent Invalidity in Eyeglass Screw Case Proskauer Rose LLP
Oct
5
2015
Achates Reference Publishing v. Apple: Federal Circuit Appeal in IPR2013-00080, 00081 Faegre Drinker
Jan
29
2013
ACLU Files Petitioners’ Brief in AMP v. Myriad Appeal Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Jun
30
2016
Acquiescence Defense – Don’t Try to Use It Too Early McDermott Will & Emery
Mar
26
2014
Acquiring and Transferring Energy Technology in the Middle East Hunton Andrews Kurth
Aug
25
2015
Acquisition of HERE – a Prime Example of How IP Can “Drive” Value Foley & Lardner LLP
Jun
5
2014
AcryliCon Accuses Silikal Of Trademark Infringement and Misappropriation of Trade Secrets Womble Bond Dickinson (US) LLP
Jun
4
2015
Act II: Oral Argument in Amgen v. Sandoz is heard at the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Jan
29
2019
Act on Financial Support for Audio Visual Production Published in the Journal of Laws K&L Gates
Jul
31
2017
Actavis UK Limited v Eli Lilly: plus ça change Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLP
Dec
28
2015
Actifio v. Delphix Corp: Authorized To Cross-Examine After Declaration Was Filed Regardless Of Service Date IPR2015-00014 Faegre Drinker
Apr
11
2016
Actifio v. Delphix Corp: Evidence Supporting Prior Art Status of Reference Permitted with Reply in Final Written Decision Finding Challenged Claims Unpatentable IPR2015-00052 Faegre Drinker
May
21
2015
Actifio v. Delphix Corp: Granting Institution IPR2015-00100 Faegre Drinker
Nov
26
2015
Actifio, Inc. v. Delphix Corp. - Order Granting Motion to Compel Routine Discovery IPR2015-00015, 16, 19, 25, 26, 34, 100, 108, 128 Faegre Drinker
May
12
2020
Actions Speak Louder Than Words: Germany’s Highest Court Tells Sep Implementers That Simply Saying That You Are Willing To License Is Not Enough, And Hold-out Will Not Be Tolerated Mintz
Dec
17
2013
Actions Under § 337 Based on Inducement Require Existence of Direct Infringement Prior to Importation McDermott Will & Emery
Dec
31
2013
Actions Under § 337 Based on Inducement Require the Existence of Direct Infringement Prior to Importation McDermott Will & Emery
Apr
27
2021
Activision Files Lawsuit Over the Rights to Use the Word Warzone in the Call Of Duty Series Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Jul
1
2015
Activities For sNDA and Citizen’s Petition Protected by “Safe Harbor” - Supplemental New Drug Application McDermott Will & Emery
Mar
28
2018
Activity Outside Licensed “Field of Use” Not a Material Breach McDermott Will & Emery
May
19
2015
Actor Did Not Have Copyright Interest in Mohammed Film, Ninth Circuit Rules Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLP
Mar
4
2013
Acts of Direct Infringement Not Required to Establish Case and Controversy of Indirect Infringement McDermott Will & Emery
Apr
14
2022
Acts Supporting Induced Infringement Allegations Must Occur During Damages Period McDermott Will & Emery
Feb
9
2023
Actual Confusion Is the Best Evidence of Confusion McDermott Will & Emery
Sep
29
2020
Actual Definitions Can Help Avoid Erroneous Constructions of Patent Claims Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLP
Jul
24
2011
Actual Knowledge an Element of § 271(B) Inducement, but Willful Blindness Will Suffice McDermott Will & Emery
Nov
25
2014
Actual Negotiations Trump 40-Year Georgia-Pacific Test to Determine Type of Patent Licensing Royalties McDermott Will & Emery
Mar
23
2023
Actual or Potential Consumers in Related Goods Context Doesn’t Require PURE Overlap McDermott Will & Emery
Mar
3
2021
Actual Use Required: What a Plaintiff Must Allege Under New Jersey’s Computer Related Offenses and Trade Secrets Acts Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLP
 

NLR Logo

We collaborate with the world's leading lawyers to deliver news tailored for you. Sign Up to receive our free e-Newsbulletins

 

Sign Up for e-NewsBulletins