Intellectual Property

Intellectual property disputes take place on a daily basis in a variety of venues. From an employee’s right to a patent of company-developed products to patent wars between international companies for illegal use of a product/logo, the National Law Review is a great resource for updates on all things IP. The site covers litigation at the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) and the  Patent Trial and Board Appeals (PTAB), as well as cases in front of the International Trade Commission (ITC) for international patent disputes. The National Law Review covers cases heard by the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS), or appeals which are now sitting in front of the patent-board on Inter partes review (IPR). Additionally, the National Law Review covers cases and decisions of the Federal Trade Commission (FTC).

Copyrights, patent infringement claims, trade secrets, false advertising claims, unfair competition, and intellectual property laws which govern patent-litigation, are all areas which the National Law Review covers, in detail for readers. Patent disputes don’t only occur in the United States. When international countries including the United Kingdom, Brazil, China, India, and the European Union get involved, international laws are also taken into consideration by the PTO. Additionally, information on how to obtain patent protection internationally is also available on the National Law Review.

Intellectual property news on the National Law Review spans from topics including biosimilars, domain name registration, generic top-level domains (gTLDs), drug patents, non-compete agreements, trade secrets, and other industry-related battles which ensue, are covered on the site. Visitors can read about the latest legislation, laws, and news, as it relates to patents and intellectual property in general. Further, visitors to the National Law Review are going to find the latest stories and litigation as it unfolds in front of patent courts across the land. From email and data retention policies, patent disputes over medical devices, cloud computing and artificial intelligence the National Law Review has the details and expert intellectual property litigation legal analysis readers count on.

For hourly updates on the latest news about Intellectual Property Law, IP Litigation, Patent Legislation, and more, be sure to follow our IP Law Twitter feed, and sign up for complimentary e-news bulletins.

Custom text Title Organization Sort descending
Apr
10
2014
Ninth Circuit Hearing on California Resale Royalties Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Jul
14
2016
En Banc: Federal Circuit Provides Guidance on Application of On-Sale Bar to Contract Manufacturers Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Jun
26
2014
New Updated FTC Care Labeling Rules: “Do’s and Don’ts” Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Jun
29
2021
Is Lawful Possession of a Trade Secret Enough for Standing to Sue for Misappropriation? Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Aug
31
2009
Joseph Abboud Is Back: Personal Name Trademark Controversy Continues Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Jun
25
2010
Smells Like Trademark Protection: Copycat Perfumes Cannot Engage in Comparative Advertising, on Odor of the Court in the UK and EU Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Oct
15
2021
Trade Secret Misappropriation: Denial of Motion for Attorneys’ Fees under CUTSA is Not an Appealable Order Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Apr
18
2011
Tweet Me! - The Southern District of New York Answers Copyright Questions Raised By Twitter and Twitpic Use Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Jul
31
2011
Increasing Level of Seizures by U.S. Customs Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Aug
21
2011
Court Denies Louboutin Preliminary Injunction: Holds Fashion Blind to Single Color Marks Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Mar
2
2022
Money Laundering and High-Value Art: Treasury’s Study Discusses Financial Crimes and NFTs Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Jun
13
2015
Rogue Witnesses (Silicon Valley, Episode 17) Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Apr
14
2022
Tokenization and the Law: Legal Issues with NFTs Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Apr
12
2023
Another Federal Agency Issues Request for Comments on AI Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Mar
31
2013
BONDing WITH NPE's - The Requirement for Security for Costs or Expenses Under Section 1030 of the California Code of Civil Procedure Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Apr
11
2013
Things to Know About the Latest Final Interim Rules to Patent Term Adjustment under the America Invents Act (AIA) Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Aug
31
2023
Inguran, LLC, DBA STGenetics V. ABS Global, INC., Genius PLC, No. 2022-1385 (July 5, 2023) Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Apr
5
2019
Do NOT Give NDAs the Short Shrift Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Oct
17
2023
United Cannabis Corporation v. Pure Hemp Collective Inc. Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Oct
11
2013
Apple is Fighting Back in Brazilian Courts to Get its iPhone Trademark Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Oct
24
2023
In Re: Cellect, LLC No. 2022-1293 (Fed. Cir. Aug. 28, 2023) Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Mar
29
2016
Federal Circuit Limits Estoppel Provision of AIA Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Dec
18
2023
Federal Circuit Vacates Invalidity Judgement Based on Collateral Estoppel from a Case Subsequently Vacated and Rebukes Plaintiff’s About-Face on Its Stipulated Claim Construction Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Dec
21
2023
Anticipation and Obviousness in Patent Law: An Analysis of Recent IPR Decisions Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Feb
14
2024
Federal Circuit Rules on Inventor-as-Lexicographer Definitions and the Proper Scope of Reply and Sur-Reply Briefing Following Patent Owner Responses to IPR Institution Decisions Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Dec
6
2019
Left Empty Handed: Value Shut Down on Written Prior Art, Highlighting Importance of System Art Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Apr
10
2014
Intent To Use – It’s Not The Thought That Counts Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Jan
7
2020
Artificial Intelligence (AI) Patents – Will the Patent Office Change the Rules? Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
May
10
2024
How to Recover Attorneys’ Fees in a Schedule A Trademark Case in the Northern District of Illinois Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Mar
25
2020
COVID-19 and Trade Secrets: Is Your Business Prepared to Protect its Trade Secrets While Your Employees Work From Home? Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Apr
9
2020
4 Steps to More Effectively Use NDAs to Protect Confidential Information Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Apr
16
2020
Delaware 101 Pleading Analysis Leaves Parties Guessing and Prosecutors Moving to Adapt Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Aug
12
2014
Sham Hatch-Waxman Infringement Suits And FDA Citizen Petitions; A Potential For New Liability For Innovators? Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Jan
3
2017
New York Court of Appeals Says No Common Law Public Performance Right For Pre-1972 Sound Recordings Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Aug
14
2020
Ixchel v. Biogen: California B2B Noncompetes Do Not Per Se Violate B&P Section 16600, and Are Instead Subject to Rule of Reason Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
 

NLR Logo

We collaborate with the world's leading lawyers to deliver news tailored for you. Sign Up to receive our free e-Newsbulletins

 

Sign Up for e-NewsBulletins