Intellectual Property

Intellectual property disputes take place on a daily basis in a variety of venues. From an employee’s right to a patent of company-developed products to patent wars between international companies for illegal use of a product/logo, the National Law Review is a great resource for updates on all things IP. The site covers litigation at the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) and the  Patent Trial and Board Appeals (PTAB), as well as cases in front of the International Trade Commission (ITC) for international patent disputes. The National Law Review covers cases heard by the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS), or appeals which are now sitting in front of the patent-board on Inter partes review (IPR). Additionally, the National Law Review covers cases and decisions of the Federal Trade Commission (FTC).

Copyrights, patent infringement claims, trade secrets, false advertising claims, unfair competition, and intellectual property laws which govern patent-litigation, are all areas which the National Law Review covers, in detail for readers. Patent disputes don’t only occur in the United States. When international countries including the United Kingdom, Brazil, China, India, and the European Union get involved, international laws are also taken into consideration by the PTO. Additionally, information on how to obtain patent protection internationally is also available on the National Law Review.

Intellectual property news on the National Law Review spans from topics including biosimilars, domain name registration, generic top-level domains (gTLDs), drug patents, non-compete agreements, trade secrets, and other industry-related battles which ensue, are covered on the site. Visitors can read about the latest legislation, laws, and news, as it relates to patents and intellectual property in general. Further, visitors to the National Law Review are going to find the latest stories and litigation as it unfolds in front of patent courts across the land. From email and data retention policies, patent disputes over medical devices, cloud computing and artificial intelligence the National Law Review has the details and expert intellectual property litigation legal analysis readers count on.

For hourly updates on the latest news about Intellectual Property Law, IP Litigation, Patent Legislation, and more, be sure to follow our IP Law Twitter feed, and sign up for complimentary e-news bulletins.

Custom text Title Sort descending Organization
Jun
19
2019
A Figurative Mark? A Position Mark? Or Just A Trade Mark? K&L Gates
May
10
2013
A First for Fair, Reasonable and Non-Discriminatory (FRAND): Federal Court in Microsoft v. Motorola Sets FRAND Royalty Rates for Standard Essential Patents McDermott Will & Emery
Jan
3
2015
A First Look at New York City’s Next Generation of Entrepreneurs Greenberg Traurig, LLP
Jul
1
2014
A Football Team, by Any Other Name…: USPTO Decision Illustrates that Law is More than Hard & Fast Rules Varnum LLP
Dec
3
2021
A Forgiving Response to a Candidly Admitted Error But Still Costly Finnegan
Jun
28
2018
A Forum Selection Clause Provides No Basis For Terminating A Section 337 Investigation Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLP
Jun
11
2011
A Four-Step Guide for Securing Patent Portfolios after Stanford v. Roche Lowndes, Drosdick, Doster, Kantor & Reed, P.A.
Jun
21
2021
A Fractured Vision of Eligibility — Split Federal Circuit Panel Finds Digital Camera Claims Ineligible Finnegan
Jan
22
2019
A Fresh Look At The Lead Compound Analysis Foley & Lardner LLP
Aug
30
2013
A Generic Disclosure Does Not Support Claims to Individual Species Re: Protein Variants and Litigation McDermott Will & Emery
Jul
22
2021
A Goldilocks Dilemma: What is the “Right Amount” When Pleading Patent Infringement Cases? McDermott Will & Emery
Sep
29
2016
A Graphical User Interface Situation for Covered Business Method McDermott Will & Emery
Dec
8
2011
A Green Light to Block Red Light Domain Names Bracewell LLP
Mar
11
2012
A Gripping (Graft) Saga Draws to a Close McDermott Will & Emery
May
30
2013
A Guide through Europe’s New Unified Patent System McDermott Will & Emery
Jul
20
2021
A Guiding Light for the Research Safe Harbor and “Research Tools”? Proskauer Rose LLP
Nov
29
2022
A Healthy Dose of Seeds: Unique Combination Trade Secrets Entitled to Protection McDermott Will & Emery
Oct
25
2018
A High Bar for Fee Awards Against the Bar McDermott Will & Emery
Jun
14
2022
A High Mountain to Climb: Filing DTSA Claims Without any Evidence is Not Enough to Meet “Bad Faith” Standard for Awarding Attorneys’ Fees to Opponent Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Nov
2
2014
A Hypothetical-License Damages Theory Must Be Rooted in Non-Hypothetical Evidence McDermott Will & Emery
Aug
27
2015
A Joint Author Does Not Own Derived Material McDermott Will & Emery
Jul
31
2015
A Kinder, Gentler PTAB Allows Claim Amendments: REG Synthetic Fuels LLC v. Neste Oil Oyj McDermott Will & Emery
May
2
2024
A Lesson in Laches: You Waited Too Long to Start Your Kar McDermott Will & Emery
Nov
18
2012
A Licensee Can Sometimes Bear the Burden of Proof on Non-Infringement McDermott Will & Emery
Mar
26
2024
A Lidl Decision with Big Implications – Court of Appeal Edition K&L Gates
May
5
2023
A Lidl Decision with Big Implications – UK High Court Finds That Tesco’s Clubcard Logo Infringes Lidl’s Logo K&L Gates
Sep
24
2021
A Look at AIA § 3(n)(2): Part Two of a Two-Part Series on AIA § 3(n) Effective Filing Date Provisions Finnegan
Dec
14
2022
A Look At The Upcoming European Unitary Patent And Unified Patent Court Barnes & Thornburg LLP
Aug
8
2017
A Look At The USPTO Patent Eligible Subject Matter Report Foley & Lardner LLP
Feb
20
2020
A Lot of Hot Air? Obviousness Testimony Must Come from POSITA McDermott Will & Emery
Mar
1
2018
A Matter of Form: Pay Attention to Custom Verdict Instructions McDermott Will & Emery
Oct
19
2023
A Matter of Style: No Need to Select “Primary” Reference in Obviousness Challenge McDermott Will & Emery
Mar
16
2023
A Maze-Like Path and Laundry List Don’t Provide Written Description McDermott Will & Emery
Jul
14
2023
A Mid-Year Analysis of AI Foley & Lardner LLP
Feb
28
2014
A Minor Shift in Patent Term Adjustment Calculations McDermott Will & Emery
 

NLR Logo

We collaborate with the world's leading lawyers to deliver news tailored for you. Sign Up to receive our free e-Newsbulletins

 

Sign Up for e-NewsBulletins