Aug 24 2016 |
Update on Peter Doig: Artist Sued for Denying He Created Art Piece |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Mar 3 2021 |
Patent Infringement Pleading Standards Remain Unsettled Five Years After the Abrogation of Form 18 – Part 2: Pleading Standards in Delaware |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Oct 10 2014 |
Allegations that Defendants Provided Product for “Free” State Claims Under California’s Unfair Practices Act (UPA) and Unfair Competition Law (UCL), Notwithstanding that “Cost” of Product Was Recouped by Overcharging for Shipping |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Mar 25 2021 |
Protecting IP and Limiting Liability When Licensing IP for Digital Art and NFTs |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Nov 24 2014 |
Versata Software, Inc. v. Callidus Software, Inc.: Guidance on Stays Pending Post-Issuance Proceedings |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Sep 7 2021 |
Sharing Motion Picture Materials: Practical Considerations |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Dec 2 2021 |
Court Finds Company Entitled to Nominal Damages for Former Employee’s Breach of an NDA |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Sep 16 2010 |
ITAR License Exemption Amended To Allow Hand-Carrying Of Technical Data Outside The United States |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Apr 11 2011 |
Protecting Trade Secrets In A Post-WikiLeaks World |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
May 18 2015 |
There’s No Such Thing As a Free Sample |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Oct 4 2022 |
The District of Columbia Revises Ban on Non-Competes |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Feb 1 2023 |
“Not My Work”: When Artists Dispute Authorship |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Aug 1 2023 |
Valve Rejects Games with AI Assets Over Copyright Concerns |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Apr 11 2019 |
Caution to Game Companies: PTAB Continues to Preclude PTAB Challenges That It Views As Untimely |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
May 6 2019 |
Framing Your Pitch: A Lesson from the TTI v. IBG Cases |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Jun 27 2013 |
Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) Goes Down - Copyright Goes Up - U.S. v. Windsor, Supreme Court, No. 12-307, Decided June 26, 2013 |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Nov 21 2023 |
Necessity Is the Mother of Invention – But New York Law Says Employers Better Not Take the Credit |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Aug 7 2013 |
Beijing Higher People's Court Clarifies Usage of Consent Letters to Overcome Trademark Rejections in the People's Republic of China (PRC) |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Dec 7 2023 |
Getty Image’s AI Model Training Lawsuit in UK Against Stability to Proceed |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Dec 15 2023 |
Axonics v. Medtronic |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Jan 2 2024 |
The Intertwining Nature of Motivation to Combine and Reasonable Expectation of Success |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Dec 31 2013 |
A Short-Lived Victory for Generic Manufacturers? – Part 2 |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
May 25 2016 |
Federal Circuit Finds Software-Related Claims Patent Eligible in Enfish v. Microsoft Corp. |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Jul 7 2020 |
Supreme Court sides with booking.com – generic.com trademarks not necessarily generic |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Oct 14 2016 |
Proposed New FDA Labeling Rules Would Result in Increased Generic Drug Product Liability Claims |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Feb 12 2021 |
A “Culture Of Concealment” – Scrutinizing Overbroad NDAs |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Mar 27 2017 |
Who’s Got the Spirit?! Supreme Court Decides Star Athletic v. Varsity Brands; New Two-Part Test Seeks to Clear Up “Mess” But Questions Still Remain About Subjective Nature of Separability Analysis |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Jun 28 2021 |
Striking the Balance Between Detailed Description and Unnecessary Disclosure of the “Secret” in Trade Secret Litigation Pleadings |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Dec 16 2014 |
Sandoz and Celltrion Decline the Invitation to Dance: Biosimilars Challenge the Applicability of the BPCIA’s Exchange Provisions Before Bringing Suit |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Mar 31 2011 |
Expanded Standing, or "Back to Basics"? Flash Memory Direct Purchasers Found to Have Standing to Assert Walker Process Claims |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Jul 27 2022 |
Too Many Bites at the Apple? |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Oct 5 2022 |
Takeaways From the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office’s Artificial Intelligence and Emerging Technologies Partnership Series – Part Two of Three |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
May 22 2018 |
Recent Blockchain Patents of Note : May 22, 2018 |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Jan 17 2013 |
In a Rarely-Seen Joint-Effort in the Competition Arena, the DOJ and the USPTO Unite in Issuing a Policy Statement on Remedies Involving Standard Essential Patents |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Jan 25 2013 |
Thin Copyrights - Protected But Not Infringed |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |