Intellectual Property

Intellectual property disputes take place on a daily basis in a variety of venues. From an employee’s right to a patent of company-developed products to patent wars between international companies for illegal use of a product/logo, the National Law Review is a great resource for updates on all things IP. The site covers litigation at the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) and the  Patent Trial and Board Appeals (PTAB), as well as cases in front of the International Trade Commission (ITC) for international patent disputes. The National Law Review covers cases heard by the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS), or appeals which are now sitting in front of the patent-board on Inter partes review (IPR). Additionally, the National Law Review covers cases and decisions of the Federal Trade Commission (FTC).

Copyrights, patent infringement claims, trade secrets, false advertising claims, unfair competition, and intellectual property laws which govern patent-litigation, are all areas which the National Law Review covers, in detail for readers. Patent disputes don’t only occur in the United States. When international countries including the United Kingdom, Brazil, China, India, and the European Union get involved, international laws are also taken into consideration by the PTO. Additionally, information on how to obtain patent protection internationally is also available on the National Law Review.

Intellectual property news on the National Law Review spans from topics including biosimilars, domain name registration, generic top-level domains (gTLDs), drug patents, non-compete agreements, trade secrets, and other industry-related battles which ensue, are covered on the site. Visitors can read about the latest legislation, laws, and news, as it relates to patents and intellectual property in general. Further, visitors to the National Law Review are going to find the latest stories and litigation as it unfolds in front of patent courts across the land. From email and data retention policies, patent disputes over medical devices, cloud computing and artificial intelligence the National Law Review has the details and expert intellectual property litigation legal analysis readers count on.

For hourly updates on the latest news about Intellectual Property Law, IP Litigation, Patent Legislation, and more, be sure to follow our IP Law Twitter feed, and sign up for complimentary e-news bulletins.

Custom text Title Organization Sort descending
Aug
24
2016
Update on Peter Doig: Artist Sued for Denying He Created Art Piece Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Mar
3
2021
Patent Infringement Pleading Standards Remain Unsettled Five Years After the Abrogation of Form 18 – Part 2: Pleading Standards in Delaware Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Oct
10
2014
Allegations that Defendants Provided Product for “Free” State Claims Under California’s Unfair Practices Act (UPA) and Unfair Competition Law (UCL), Notwithstanding that “Cost” of Product Was Recouped by Overcharging for Shipping Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Mar
25
2021
Protecting IP and Limiting Liability When Licensing IP for Digital Art and NFTs Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Nov
24
2014
Versata Software, Inc. v. Callidus Software, Inc.: Guidance on Stays Pending Post-Issuance Proceedings Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Sep
7
2021
Sharing Motion Picture Materials: Practical Considerations Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Dec
2
2021
Court Finds Company Entitled to Nominal Damages for Former Employee’s Breach of an NDA Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Sep
16
2010
ITAR License Exemption Amended To Allow Hand-Carrying Of Technical Data Outside The United States Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Apr
11
2011
Protecting Trade Secrets In A Post-WikiLeaks World Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
May
18
2015
There’s No Such Thing As a Free Sample Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Oct
4
2022
The District of Columbia Revises Ban on Non-Competes Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Feb
1
2023
“Not My Work”: When Artists Dispute Authorship Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Aug
1
2023
Valve Rejects Games with AI Assets Over Copyright Concerns Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Apr
11
2019
Caution to Game Companies: PTAB Continues to Preclude PTAB Challenges That It Views As Untimely Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
May
6
2019
Framing Your Pitch: A Lesson from the TTI v. IBG Cases Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Jun
27
2013
Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) Goes Down - Copyright Goes Up - U.S. v. Windsor, Supreme Court, No. 12-307, Decided June 26, 2013 Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Nov
21
2023
Necessity Is the Mother of Invention – But New York Law Says Employers Better Not Take the Credit Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Aug
7
2013
Beijing Higher People's Court Clarifies Usage of Consent Letters to Overcome Trademark Rejections in the People's Republic of China (PRC) Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Dec
7
2023
Getty Image’s AI Model Training Lawsuit in UK Against Stability to Proceed Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Dec
15
2023
Axonics v. Medtronic Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Jan
2
2024
The Intertwining Nature of Motivation to Combine and Reasonable Expectation of Success Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Dec
31
2013
A Short-Lived Victory for Generic Manufacturers? – Part 2 Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
May
25
2016
Federal Circuit Finds Software-Related Claims Patent Eligible in Enfish v. Microsoft Corp. Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Jul
7
2020
Supreme Court sides with booking.com – generic.com trademarks not necessarily generic Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Oct
14
2016
Proposed New FDA Labeling Rules Would Result in Increased Generic Drug Product Liability Claims Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Feb
12
2021
A “Culture Of Concealment” – Scrutinizing Overbroad NDAs Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Mar
27
2017
Who’s Got the Spirit?! Supreme Court Decides Star Athletic v. Varsity Brands; New Two-Part Test Seeks to Clear Up “Mess” But Questions Still Remain About Subjective Nature of Separability Analysis Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Jun
28
2021
Striking the Balance Between Detailed Description and Unnecessary Disclosure of the “Secret” in Trade Secret Litigation Pleadings Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Dec
16
2014
Sandoz and Celltrion Decline the Invitation to Dance: Biosimilars Challenge the Applicability of the BPCIA’s Exchange Provisions Before Bringing Suit Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Mar
31
2011
Expanded Standing, or "Back to Basics"? Flash Memory Direct Purchasers Found to Have Standing to Assert Walker Process Claims Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Jul
27
2022
Too Many Bites at the Apple? Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Oct
5
2022
Takeaways From the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office’s Artificial Intelligence and Emerging Technologies Partnership Series – Part Two of Three Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
May
22
2018
Recent Blockchain Patents of Note : May 22, 2018 Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Jan
17
2013
In a Rarely-Seen Joint-Effort in the Competition Arena, the DOJ and the USPTO Unite in Issuing a Policy Statement on Remedies Involving Standard Essential Patents Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Jan
25
2013
Thin Copyrights - Protected But Not Infringed Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
 

NLR Logo

We collaborate with the world's leading lawyers to deliver news tailored for you. Sign Up to receive our free e-Newsbulletins

 

Sign Up for e-NewsBulletins