Intellectual Property

Intellectual property disputes take place on a daily basis in a variety of venues. From an employee’s right to a patent of company-developed products to patent wars between international companies for illegal use of a product/logo, the National Law Review is a great resource for updates on all things IP. The site covers litigation at the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) and the  Patent Trial and Board Appeals (PTAB), as well as cases in front of the International Trade Commission (ITC) for international patent disputes. The National Law Review covers cases heard by the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS), or appeals which are now sitting in front of the patent-board on Inter partes review (IPR). Additionally, the National Law Review covers cases and decisions of the Federal Trade Commission (FTC).

Copyrights, patent infringement claims, trade secrets, false advertising claims, unfair competition, and intellectual property laws which govern patent-litigation, are all areas which the National Law Review covers, in detail for readers. Patent disputes don’t only occur in the United States. When international countries including the United Kingdom, Brazil, China, India, and the European Union get involved, international laws are also taken into consideration by the PTO. Additionally, information on how to obtain patent protection internationally is also available on the National Law Review.

Intellectual property news on the National Law Review spans from topics including biosimilars, domain name registration, generic top-level domains (gTLDs), drug patents, non-compete agreements, trade secrets, and other industry-related battles which ensue, are covered on the site. Visitors can read about the latest legislation, laws, and news, as it relates to patents and intellectual property in general. Further, visitors to the National Law Review are going to find the latest stories and litigation as it unfolds in front of patent courts across the land. From email and data retention policies, patent disputes over medical devices, cloud computing and artificial intelligence the National Law Review has the details and expert intellectual property litigation legal analysis readers count on.

For hourly updates on the latest news about Intellectual Property Law, IP Litigation, Patent Legislation, and more, be sure to follow our IP Law Twitter feed, and sign up for complimentary e-news bulletins.

Custom text Title Sort ascending Organization
Aug
30
2016
“Providing . . . Information” to Medical Providers Is Not Given Patentable Weight McDermott Will & Emery
Sep
29
2016
“Processing System” Does Not Render Claims Indefinite Mintz
Feb
18
2015
“Precision Medicine” Initiative Leaves Patents “Lost in Space” Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Sep
20
2013
“Patent Assertion and Startup Innovation": Some Sensible Ideas Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Jun
30
2011
“Particular Machine” not required: Ex Parte Dietz et al., Appeal 2009-008029, BPAI Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Dec
9
2012
“PARIS” Is Misdescriptive of Goods Designed in Miami and Manufactured in Asia McDermott Will & Emery
Dec
7
2011
“One,” But Not the One and Only McDermott Will & Emery
Jun
28
2012
“Obamacare” Survives – Including Path to Generic Biologicals Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Apr
2
2020
“Numerous Reasons” Support Finding Inequitable Conduct: Another Example of the Federal Circuit’s Current Approach to Inequitable Conduct Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLP
Feb
1
2023
“Not My Work”: When Artists Dispute Authorship Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Jan
4
2015
“Nonce” Words and Means-Plus-Function Analysis McDermott Will & Emery
May
14
2020
“Non-Limiting” Prior Art Claims Support Obviousness After Standing Is Established McDermott Will & Emery
Feb
24
2022
“Negative” Patent Claim Limitations—May They be Adequately Described by Omission? Proskauer Rose LLP
Aug
13
2020
“Method of Preparation” Claims Still Patent Eligible Under § 101 in Modified Opinion McDermott Will & Emery
Apr
9
2020
“Method of Preparation” Claims Found Patent-Eligible Under §101 McDermott Will & Emery
Feb
8
2023
“Metabirkin” NFT Maker Liable in TM Dispute K&L Gates
Nov
2
2015
“Mechanism” Claim Term Found to Be an Indefinite Means-Plus-Function Element in Media Rights Techs. v. Capital One Financial Corp. McDermott Will & Emery
May
31
2022
“Material Changes” to New Hampshire’s Noncompete Law Proposed Epstein Becker & Green, P.C.
Mar
2
2018
“Love” Is Not Enough for Trademark Confusion: Marilyn D. Mintz v. Subaru of America, Inc McDermott Will & Emery
Apr
2
2020
“Lightly Sketched” Characters Not Copyrightable McDermott Will & Emery
Mar
7
2019
“License and [Copyright] Registration Please”: Key Takeaways from the Supreme Court’s Opinion Clarifying When a Copyright Claimant Can Sue for Infringement Proskauer Rose LLP
Mar
21
2022
“Levitating” Lawsuits: Understanding Dua Lipa’s Copyright Infringement Troubles K&L Gates
Jan
22
2021
“Lettuce Turnip the Beet” Pun on T-Shirts Not Trademark Use, Ninth Circuit Affirms K&L Gates
Jun
7
2013
“Lawfully Made Under This Title” - The New, Global Reach of U.S. Copyright Law’s “First Space” Doctrine Dickinson Wright PLLC
Mar
24
2017
“Knock-Offs” Beware: SCOTUS Makes a Fashion-Forward Decision Womble Bond Dickinson (US) LLP
Mar
31
2013
“Kitchen Sink” Patent Applications Womble Bond Dickinson (US) LLP
Apr
28
2015
“Isolated” Natural Products Still in Purgatory Post-PTO Guidance? Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Feb
1
2017
“Inventive Concept” Requires Specific Use of Computer Components Beyond Their Generic Use McDermott Will & Emery
Apr
3
2013
“Innovation Meets Insight:” An Intellectual Property Expert’s Take on the Revised America Invents Act (AIA)
Apr
26
2011
“Innocent” Criminals: Criminal Copyright Infringement, Willfulness and Fair Use Pace University School of Law
Feb
2
2014
“Inherency Requires More Than Probabilities” - Motorola Mobility, LLC v. Int’l Trade Comm’n McDermott Will & Emery
Sep
27
2017
“In Light of the Specification”: Federal Circuit Weighs in on the Broadest Reasonable Interpretation Mintz
Jul
11
2012
“In Leukemia Treatment, Glimpses of the Future” of Medicine and IP Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Jan
10
2012
“Imitation Two-Year Provisional” Option Extended Through 2012 Bracewell LLP
Jun
29
2015
“If Wishes Were Horses” – Roberts’ Dissent from Myriad Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
 

NLR Logo

We collaborate with the world's leading lawyers to deliver news tailored for you. Sign Up to receive our free e-Newsbulletins

 

Sign Up for e-NewsBulletins