Intellectual Property

Intellectual property disputes take place on a daily basis in a variety of venues. From an employee’s right to a patent of company-developed products to patent wars between international companies for illegal use of a product/logo, the National Law Review is a great resource for updates on all things IP. The site covers litigation at the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) and the  Patent Trial and Board Appeals (PTAB), as well as cases in front of the International Trade Commission (ITC) for international patent disputes. The National Law Review covers cases heard by the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS), or appeals which are now sitting in front of the patent-board on Inter partes review (IPR). Additionally, the National Law Review covers cases and decisions of the Federal Trade Commission (FTC).

Copyrights, patent infringement claims, trade secrets, false advertising claims, unfair competition, and intellectual property laws which govern patent-litigation, are all areas which the National Law Review covers, in detail for readers. Patent disputes don’t only occur in the United States. When international countries including the United Kingdom, Brazil, China, India, and the European Union get involved, international laws are also taken into consideration by the PTO. Additionally, information on how to obtain patent protection internationally is also available on the National Law Review.

Intellectual property news on the National Law Review spans from topics including biosimilars, domain name registration, generic top-level domains (gTLDs), drug patents, non-compete agreements, trade secrets, and other industry-related battles which ensue, are covered on the site. Visitors can read about the latest legislation, laws, and news, as it relates to patents and intellectual property in general. Further, visitors to the National Law Review are going to find the latest stories and litigation as it unfolds in front of patent courts across the land. From email and data retention policies, patent disputes over medical devices, cloud computing and artificial intelligence the National Law Review has the details and expert intellectual property litigation legal analysis readers count on.

For hourly updates on the latest news about Intellectual Property Law, IP Litigation, Patent Legislation, and more, be sure to follow our IP Law Twitter feed, and sign up for complimentary e-news bulletins.

Custom text Title Organization Sort descending
Aug
4
2023
FS.COM INC. v. International Trade Commission Corning Optical Communications LLC – Intervenor No. 22-1228 (Fed. Cir. Apr. 20, 2023) Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Mar
21
2019
Federal Circuit Weighs in on Patent Subject-Matter Eligibility of Dietary Supplements Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Sep
13
2023
SEC Enforcements Against NFTs – Are You Next? Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Jul
15
2013
The Architecture of Copyright Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Dec
11
2023
The March on Pharmaceutical Patents? Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Jan
8
2024
Nota Bene Episode 168: How Patent Disputes Affect the Semiconductor Industry [PODCAST] Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Nov
18
2013
No Avoiding BPCIA (Biologics Price Competition and Innovation Act) For Biosimilars: No Patent Declaratory Judgment Action Before Biosimilars Application Is Filed Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Feb
28
2024
Federal Circuit Weighs in on Temporal Rigidity of the Baye-Dole Act’s Licensing Provisions Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Feb
8
2014
Bitcoins and Liability in the Wake of Recent Silk Road Arrests Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Mar
12
2020
Machine Learning Patentability in 2019: 5 Cases Analyzed and Lessons Learned Part 4 Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Jun
27
2014
USPTO Issues Preliminary Examination Instructions in Light of Alice Corp. - U.S. Patent And Trademark Office Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Jul
1
2020
USPTO Announces New Pilot Program to Expedite Appeals Process Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Oct
10
2016
Supreme Court and the Lanham Act: Lee v Tam Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Jan
25
2017
Suing The United States Government For Patent Infringement And Defending Against A Claim Of Obviousness Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Feb
23
2021
LG Chem’s Win In $1 Billion Electric Vehicle Trade Secret Dispute Upheld by International Trade Commission Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Feb
25
2021
How to Successfully Obtain Blockchain Patents Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Jul
27
2021
Trade Secret Litigants Take Note: California District Court Provides Guidance on Obtaining a Preliminary Injunction and Expedited Discovery Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Jan
26
2015
Teva v. Sandoz (USSC) – Standard for Appellate Review of Claim Construction Rulings Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Aug
28
2009
Brave New Web: Trademark Rights in the Expanding Internet Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Jul
11
2010
Mexico Passes New Law on Data Protection Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Feb
2
2011
FDA Announces Its Plan For Changes to the 510(k) "Approval" Pathway Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Mar
28
2022
Ninth Circuit Upholds Application of California Labor Code To Contractual Forum-Selection and Choice-of-Law Clause To Keep Dispute Over Non-Compete Clause in California Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Aug
8
2011
Federal Circuit Holds that "Isolated DNA Molecules" Are Patentable Subject Matter and Method Claims Merely "Comparing" or "Analyzing" Are Not Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Oct
28
2017
Florida Now Follows New York to Find No Common Law Public Performance Right For Pre-1972 Sound Recordings Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Jun
14
2022
A High Mountain to Climb: Filing DTSA Claims Without any Evidence is Not Enough to Meet “Bad Faith” Standard for Awarding Attorneys’ Fees to Opponent Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Mar
30
2023
Will eBook Ruling Impact Fair Use Analysis for Generative AI? Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Apr
27
2023
Solving Open Source Problems with AI Code Generators – Legal Issues and Solutions Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Aug
8
2013
Dang v. San Francisco Forty Niners - Consumers Can Challenge Reebok's Exclusive NFL Apparel Deal Based Just on a Market of Garments Bearing NFL Team Logos Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Dec
14
2023
Federal Circuit Weighs in on Relevance of Primary Reference’s Intended Purpose to a POSITA’s Motivation to Combine Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Aug
22
2019
Celebrity Entertainer Sues Over Video Game Avatar Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Dec
2
2013
Kraft v. Cracker Barrel: A Summary of Judge Posner’s Opinion and an Alternative Reverse Confusion Theory of Liability Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Sep
19
2019
Driver’s License: Copyright Infringement in the World of Street Art Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Feb
13
2024
Federal Circuit Rebukes Attempt to Incorporate Arguments by Reference to a Related IPR Petition Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Apr
23
2014
Microsoft-Nokia: China’s MOFCOM (Ministry of Commerce) Quietly Slips Into the Debate about Injunctive Relief for FRAND (Fair, Reasonable and Nondiscriminatory)-Encumbered SEPs (Standard Essential Patents) Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Mar
28
2020
Congress Gives Patent and Trademark Office Temporary Authorization to Move Deadlines in Light of COVID-19 Pandemic Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
 

NLR Logo

We collaborate with the world's leading lawyers to deliver news tailored for you. Sign Up to receive our free e-Newsbulletins

 

Sign Up for e-NewsBulletins