Intellectual Property

Intellectual property disputes take place on a daily basis in a variety of venues. From an employee’s right to a patent of company-developed products to patent wars between international companies for illegal use of a product/logo, the National Law Review is a great resource for updates on all things IP. The site covers litigation at the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) and the  Patent Trial and Board Appeals (PTAB), as well as cases in front of the International Trade Commission (ITC) for international patent disputes. The National Law Review covers cases heard by the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS), or appeals which are now sitting in front of the patent-board on Inter partes review (IPR). Additionally, the National Law Review covers cases and decisions of the Federal Trade Commission (FTC).

Copyrights, patent infringement claims, trade secrets, false advertising claims, unfair competition, and intellectual property laws which govern patent-litigation, are all areas which the National Law Review covers, in detail for readers. Patent disputes don’t only occur in the United States. When international countries including the United Kingdom, Brazil, China, India, and the European Union get involved, international laws are also taken into consideration by the PTO. Additionally, information on how to obtain patent protection internationally is also available on the National Law Review.

Intellectual property news on the National Law Review spans from topics including biosimilars, domain name registration, generic top-level domains (gTLDs), drug patents, non-compete agreements, trade secrets, and other industry-related battles which ensue, are covered on the site. Visitors can read about the latest legislation, laws, and news, as it relates to patents and intellectual property in general. Further, visitors to the National Law Review are going to find the latest stories and litigation as it unfolds in front of patent courts across the land. From email and data retention policies, patent disputes over medical devices, cloud computing and artificial intelligence the National Law Review has the details and expert intellectual property litigation legal analysis readers count on.

For hourly updates on the latest news about Intellectual Property Law, IP Litigation, Patent Legislation, and more, be sure to follow our IP Law Twitter feed, and sign up for complimentary e-news bulletins.

Custom text Title Sort ascending Organization
Dec
4
2014
Zerto, Inc. v. EMC Corp.: Granting in part Motion for Additional Discovery IPR2014-01254, 1295, 1329, 1332 Faegre Drinker
Apr
15
2021
Zero Hero: Disclaiming Disputed Term Renders Dispute Moot McDermott Will & Emery
Mar
31
2016
Zero Gravity Inside v. Footbalance System Oy: Showing Third Party Is Executor Or Board Member Is Insufficient For Real-Parties-In-Interest IPR2015-01769 Faegre Drinker
Dec
18
2015
Zero Gravity Inside v. FootBalance System Oy: Denying Request to File Reply to Preliminary Response IPR2015-01769,70 Faegre Drinker
May
5
2014
Zero Damages Does Not Preclude Equitable Relief McDermott Will & Emery
Mar
28
2018
Zazzle And Other Print-On-Demand Websites Can Breathe A Sigh Of Relief . . . For Now Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLP
May
14
2019
Zara v Zara: The Evolving World of "Fashion" K&L Gates
Dec
11
2012
Zac Brown Band's Guitar Strap Flap Womble Bond Dickinson (US) LLP
Jun
14
2021
Yu v. Apple – Transubstantiation of a Camera into an Abstract Idea Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Jun
4
2021
You’ve Been Served! – ITC Allows Service Through Respondents’ Amazon.com Seller Profile Pages Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLP
Feb
15
2017
You’re So Vague: Federal Circuit Sends IPR Decision Back to PTAB for More Thorough Analysis Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Nov
30
2016
YouTube Ripping, A Copyright Wildfire IMS Legal Strategies
Mar
26
2020
YouTube Enables Ads on Coronavirus Content; Brands Should Evaluate Strategies to Mitigate Inadvertent Backlash Mintz
Feb
9
2022
Your Patent Application Is About To Get A First Office Action: Now What? Mintz
Feb
23
2013
Your Hotel Desk Chair May Be Patented Womble Bond Dickinson (US) LLP
Jan
26
2023
Your Gang Did What!? No Matter—No Forfeiture of IP McDermott Will & Emery
Apr
24
2020
Your Color-Based Product Packaging Mark Might Be Protectable Trade Dress Hunton Andrews Kurth
Apr
22
2021
You Want Some “Metchup” with That? McDermott Will & Emery
May
29
2020
You Streamed What? Copyright Infringement Pitfalls During COVID-19 Summa PLLC
Nov
13
2018
You Shall Not Pass: Hurdles to Federal Trademark Registration Stark & Stark
Jan
29
2015
You Say “Tom‘ah’to,” I Say “Tom‘ay’to”: Determining the Correct Pronunciation of Uniquely Coined Trademarks Katten
Jul
3
2022
You Heard it Here: The Word THE is Now a Registered Trademark, Owned by Two Parties Norris McLaughlin P.A.
May
29
2018
You Have a Creative Genius in the Workplace. Who Owns the Creative Works? Foley & Lardner LLP
Jan
22
2020
You Don’t Say! Federal Trade Commission to hold Public Workshop on Voice Cloning Technologies Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLP
Feb
25
2016
You Can’t Spell “Pressurized Collection Vessel” Without “Collection”: Akzo Nobel Coatings, Inc. v. Dow Chem. Co. McDermott Will & Emery
Feb
16
2023
You Can’t Skirt around Obviousness by Arguing Expectation of Success Must Be Absolute McDermott Will & Emery
May
6
2011
You Cannot “Game” the Appellate System by Filing a “Protective” Cross-Appeal McDermott Will & Emery
Aug
1
2016
You Cannot Create A Restrictive Covenant Out of Thin Air Foley & Lardner LLP
May
19
2017
You Can Not Claim What you Don’t Possess – Federal Circuit Holds Fiber Optic Claims Invalid under Section 112 Mintz
Nov
7
2019
You Can Have Some Lovin’—But No Personal Jurisdiction McDermott Will & Emery
Jul
17
2017
You Can Dance If You Want To: Sandoz v. Amgen Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Jul
3
2017
You Are Suspended...Now What? Four Strategies for Dealing with Trademark Office Suspensions Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Feb
29
2024
Yo-Ho-No Vicarious Liability for Online Piracy Without Financial Benefit McDermott Will & Emery
Aug
29
2018
Yo Ho No: Lack of Express Language Scuttles Claim of Sovereign Immunity Waiver McDermott Will & Emery
Oct
10
2013
YKK Corporation Files Patent Infringement Action Against Competitor Velcro USA Womble Bond Dickinson (US) LLP
 

NLR Logo

We collaborate with the world's leading lawyers to deliver news tailored for you. Sign Up to receive our free e-Newsbulletins

 

Sign Up for e-NewsBulletins