April 16, 2014

2012 EEOC Charge Filing Stats Are In

A few weeks ago, we looked at the total number of EEOC charges filed with the agency from 1997-2011. The charge numbers for 2012 just came in and as expected, the total numbers have dropped – but by an almost imperceptible amount. Here is the updated chart:

Total EEOC Charge Filings 1997-2012

The total number of charges filed in 2011 was 99,947.  For those with magnifying glasses, this fell in 2012 by a little more than 500 to 99,412.  Looking at the chart as a whole, it is clear that the pattern of total charges reflects the ebb and flow of the larger economy.  However, another point that is clear is that the pace of the reduction in charges from their peak in 2010 has been considerably slower than in previous economic swings.

Another factor to consider, of course, is the type of claims filed by claimants.  Below you can see how some key types of claims have progressed over time:

 EEOC Charge Filings By Type 1997-2012 

The chart shows that retaliation remains the most frequently asserted type of claim (a position it has held since 2010), and that the number of retaliation claims has grown steadily over time – particularly after lurching upward between 2006 and 2008.  Disability and sex claims also have shown steady increases in the number of filings.  Interestingly, age claims have remained relatively flat since 2009, and race claims are trending downward. 


About the Author

Hannesson Murphy, Barnes Thornburg Law firm, Labor Law Attorney

Hannesson Murphy is a partner in Barnes & Thornburg LLP’s Indianapolis, Indiana office and a member of the firm’s Labor and Employment Law Department. 


Boost: AJAX core statistics

Legal Disclaimer

You are responsible for reading, understanding and agreeing to the National Law Review's (NLR’s) and the National Law Forum LLC's  Terms of Use and Privacy Policy before using the National Law Review website. The National Law Review is a free to use, no-log in database of legal and business articles. The content and links on are intended for general information purposes only. Any legal analysis, legislative updates or other content and links should not be construed as legal or professional advice or a substitute for such advice. No attorney-client or confidential relationship is formed by the transmission of information between you and the National Law Review website or any of the law firms, attorneys or other professionals or organizations who include content on the National Law Review website. If you require legal or professional advice, kindly contact an attorney or other suitable professional advisor.  

Some states have laws and ethical rules regarding solicitation and advertisement practices by attorneys and/or other professionals. The National Law Review is not a law firm nor is  intended to be  a referral service for attorneys and/or other professionals. The NLR does not wish, nor does it intend, to solicit the business of anyone or to refer anyone to an attorney or other professional.  NLR does not answer legal questions nor will we refer you to an attorney or other professional if you request such information from us. 

Under certain state laws the following statements may be required on this website and we have included them in order to be in full compliance with these rules. The choice of a lawyer or other professional is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements. Attorney Advertising Notice: Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Statement in compliance with Texas Rules of Professional Conduct. Unless otherwise noted, attorneys are not certified by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization, nor can NLR attest to the accuracy of any notation of Legal Specialization or other Professional Credentials.

The National Law Review - National Law Forum LLC 4700 Gilbert Ave. Suite 47 #230 Western Springs, IL 60558  Telephone  (708) 357-3317 If you would ike to contact us via email please click here.