Advertisement

May 19, 2013

21st Century Digital DOL Releases Timesheet Application

Under the Fair Labor Standards Act employers are clearly required to track and record their employees’ hours worked. On May 9, 2011, the United States Department of Labor introduced a new smartphone timesheet application that provides individual employees the ability to track their hours worked and calculate their respective compensation for those hours. Might this new smartphone application, however, create new litigation challenges for employers - such as allowing employee/plaintiffs to create fact issues to avoid summary judgment?

The DOL’s timesheet application allows employees to enter their regular rate of pay, record each day’s arrival and departure, work start and stop, and meal and break times. After this information is input into the application, an employee can calculate wages owed including overtime pay at a rate of one and one-half times the employee’s regular rate for all hours worked over forty in a workweek.

Users can add comments to their entries; view hours worked and wages owed in a daily, weekly, or monthly format; and e-mail the data as an attachment. The application does not currently allow an employee to record certain pay features such as tips, commissions, bonuses, deductions, holiday pay, weekend pay, shift differential pay, or pay for regular days of rest. The DOL has indicated however that it intends to explore updates that would allow employees to account for these items.

This initiative is one more example of why employers should ensure their recordkeeping practices and pay policies comply with federal and state wage and hour laws, and be prepared to defend the accuracy of their own records in the event of a dispute with an employee who uses the DOL timesheet application to independently track hours worked.  Employers should also be aware of potential e-discovery issues that could arise from employee use of this application.  One can imagine that employers could in fact be obligated to take steps to preserve any data entered on company-issued smartphones, downloaded on work computers, or emailed to and from work email addresses, in addition to any data presented by employees in the course of a dispute over hours worked.

©2013 Greenberg Traurig, LLP. All rights reserved.

About the Author

Associate

Christina Tellado advises and represents management in individual and class action employment litigation, including extensive wage and hour collective action experience. Her litigation experience also includes traditional labor matters including arbitrations and unfair labor practice proceedings. Christina counsels employers regarding employment, personnel and human resources issues, such as hiring and discharge matters, reductions in force, wage and hour compliance, family medical leave issues, and disability accommodations.

215-988-7868

About the Author

Associate

Natalie Hrubos represents and counsels management clients in all aspects of labor and employment law. She aggressively defends clients against allegations of sexual harassment, disability discrimination, Family and Medical Leave Act violations, age discrimination and other claims arising under federal, state and local law.  

215-988-7800

Boost: AJAX core statistics

Legal Disclaimer

You are responsible for reading, understanding and agreeing to the National Law Review's (NLR’s) and the National Law Forum LLC's  Terms of Use and Privacy Policy before using the National Law Review website. The National Law Review is a free to use, no-log in database of legal and business articles. The content and links on www.NatLawReview.com are intended for general information purposes only. Any legal analysis, legislative updates or other content and links should not be construed as legal or professional advice or a substitute for such advice. No attorney-client or confidential relationship is formed by the transmission of information between you and the National Law Review website or any of the law firms, attorneys or other professionals or organizations who include content on the National Law Review website. If you require legal or professional advice, kindly contact an attorney or other suitable professional advisor.  

Some states have laws and ethical rules regarding solicitation and advertisement practices by attorneys and/or other professionals. NLR does not accept advertising from attorneys or law firms. The National Law Review is not a law firm nor is www.NatLawReview.com  intended to be an advertisement or a referral service for attorneys and/or other professionals. The NLR does not wish, nor does it intend, to solicit the business of anyone or to refer anyone to an attorney or other professional.  NLR does not answer legal questions nor will we refer you to an attorney or other professional if you request such information from us. 

Under certain state laws the following statements may be required on this website and we have included them in order to be in full compliance with these rules. The choice of a lawyer or other professional is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements. Attorney Advertising Notice: Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Statement in compliance with Texas Rules of Professional Conduct. Unless otherwise noted, attorneys are not certified by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization, nor can NLR attest to the accuracy of any notation of Legal Specialization or other Professional Credentials.