Advertisement

May 22, 2013

Derivatives — Several Developments of Note

BANKRUPTCY COURT IN NEW YORK RULES SUBORDINATION CLAUSES IN SYNTHETIC CDOs ARE INVALID AND NOT SUBJECT TO DERIVATIVES SAFE HARBOR

In a widely anticipated ruling, the Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York has ruled that subordination clauses relating to defaulting swap counterparties in synthetic collateralized debt obligation (CDO) transactions are invalid ipso facto clause which are not enforceable under the U.S. Bankruptcy Code. In synthetic CDO transactions, the payment priority of a swap counterparty is deeply subordinated if the swap counterparty defaults under the swap transaction. The events of default include the bankruptcy of a swap counterparty. The court found no justification for this substantial payment penalty placed on a swap counterparty due to its bankruptcy and viewed it as unenforceable in U.S. bankruptcy proceedings. The court further ruled that the safe harbor for derivative transactions under the Bankruptcy Code does not extent to these subordination clauses. In this case, the synthetic CDO at issue was governed by New York law. However, in a similar case involving a synthetic CDO governed by English law, the U.K. Supreme Court recently ruled that such subordination clauses are valid in U.K. insolvency proceedings. A copy of the U.S. case can be accessed here.

CFTC ISSUES AGRICULTURAL SWAPS FINAL RULE

The Commodities Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) has issued a final rule relating to agricultural swaps. Under the final rule, agricultural swaps will be treated in a similar manner to other swap agreements. Prior to the Dodd-Frank Act (Dodd-Frank), certain agricultural swaps, for a variety of historical reasons, were treated in a different manner than other swap agreements. Given the new regulatory regime for swap agreements under Dodd-Frank, the CFTC concluded that there was no longer any valid reason for treating agricultural swaps differently than other swap agreements. This new rule will be effective on December 31, 2011. A copy of this new rule can be obtained at the CFTC’s Web site here.

CFTC AND SEC STAFFS HOST PUBLIC ROUNDTABLE ADDRESSING INTERNATIONAL ISSUES ON DERIVATIVES REGULATION UNDER DODD-FRANK

On August 1, 2011, the CFTC and SEC staffs held a joint public roundtable discussing various international issues pertaining to the implementation of derivatives regulation and addressing the considerable industry and public concerns relating to the extra territorial application of the Dodd-Frank derivatives rules. Among other things, a number of swap market participants reportedly expressed their concerns regarding potential discrepancies in international swaps regulations and possible disadvantages for U.S. entities, availability of reciprocity principle in international swaps regulations, the extent of end-users and other exemptions in U.S. and foreign swaps rules, and a range of other issues. The list of participants in the meeting, roundtable video and other relevant information can be found here.

©2013 Greenberg Traurig, LLP. All rights reserved.

About the Author

Shareholder

Sylvie Durham has been practicing law since 1985 and has experience on both the legal and business sides of derivatives, synthetic transactions, structured products and hedge funds. She spent three years as the general counsel and investment director at a New York-based structured credit fund. Prior to that, she was an investment banker and the head of structured equity products at BNP Paribas where she concentrated on structuring equity derivative products for corporations and hedge funds. Prior to BNP Paribas, she was a partner in the Structured Finance & Derivatives...

212-801-6923

About the Author

Of Counsel

Genna Garver is of counsel in the Corporate & Securities Practice of Greenberg Traurig’s New York office. She represents financial institutions in a variety of transactional and regulatory matters with a focus on investment advisers, hedge funds and other private investment funds. Genna advises clients on formation and offering matters for domestic and offshore funds, mergers and acquisitions, securities regulation, Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and state investment adviser registration and exemptions, the development and implementation of Advisers Act...

212-801-9270

Contributors

Associate

Dmitry G. Ivanov is an associate in the Corporate & Securities Practice of Greenberg Traurig's New York office.

212-801-2210

Boost: AJAX core statistics

Legal Disclaimer

You are responsible for reading, understanding and agreeing to the National Law Review's (NLR’s) and the National Law Forum LLC's  Terms of Use and Privacy Policy before using the National Law Review website. The National Law Review is a free to use, no-log in database of legal and business articles. The content and links on www.NatLawReview.com are intended for general information purposes only. Any legal analysis, legislative updates or other content and links should not be construed as legal or professional advice or a substitute for such advice. No attorney-client or confidential relationship is formed by the transmission of information between you and the National Law Review website or any of the law firms, attorneys or other professionals or organizations who include content on the National Law Review website. If you require legal or professional advice, kindly contact an attorney or other suitable professional advisor.  

Some states have laws and ethical rules regarding solicitation and advertisement practices by attorneys and/or other professionals. NLR does not accept advertising from attorneys or law firms. The National Law Review is not a law firm nor is www.NatLawReview.com  intended to be an advertisement or a referral service for attorneys and/or other professionals. The NLR does not wish, nor does it intend, to solicit the business of anyone or to refer anyone to an attorney or other professional.  NLR does not answer legal questions nor will we refer you to an attorney or other professional if you request such information from us. 

Under certain state laws the following statements may be required on this website and we have included them in order to be in full compliance with these rules. The choice of a lawyer or other professional is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements. Attorney Advertising Notice: Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Statement in compliance with Texas Rules of Professional Conduct. Unless otherwise noted, attorneys are not certified by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization, nor can NLR attest to the accuracy of any notation of Legal Specialization or other Professional Credentials.