Antitrust Law

HB Ad Slot
HB Mobile Ad Slot

In the United States, the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) and the  Department of Justice (DOJ) regulate antitrust and trade-regulations laws. From guaranteeing market monopolization doesn’t polarize the market, to regulating ‘no-poach’ antitrust agreements between employers, there are many regulations that govern this area of law. The National Law Review covers cases and news from the United States and internationally.

Joint ventures, structural issues, mergers, comparative advertising, price-fixing schemes, discrimination, and distribution constraints are among the different types of news readers will find on The National Law Review. The Antitrust Division of the DOJ highly regulates insider trading, company-organizational schemes, and monopolization by major companies, to regulate a fair and balanced industry for all companies in a given industry.

The International Trade Commission (ITC) regulates international antitrust laws, alongside other international government agencies. Illegal market trades, global competition law, international trade agreements, The North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA), and Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP), are all governed by the US and international government agencies, to guarantee fair dealings internationally. The National Law Review has regular updates on NAFTA negotiations as wells as news regarding the TPP and the United States' role in the treaty.

The Committee of Foreign Investments in the United States is also in charge of the regulation of antitrust agreements and mergers and acquisition deals between US and international businesses. The CFIUS governs investments between two American companies, as well as US-based and international companies who contract in a purchase-sale agreement to determine fairness, and proper balance in negotiations between companies on the international level.

Due to the different laws in the US and around the world, there are many government bodies that regulate and govern the antitrust and trade regulation industry. Not only to maintain a fair balance between trade partners, but also to ensure market monopolization does not occur, allowing major corporations to eliminate smaller, local, and international competitors in their niche. The National Law Review keeps readers up to date with expert legal analysis on these issues.

National Law Review Antitrust TwitterFor hourly updates on the latest news about Antitrust & Trade Regulation law, regulations, and legislation, be sure to follow our Antitrust X (formerly Twitter) feed and sign up for complimentary e-news bulletins.

Recent Antitrust, Mergers, FTC & Unfair Competition News

Title
Custom text Organization
Jun
20
2019
CFIUS Filing Clearance: Edwards Vacuum, Atlas Copco and Brooks Automation’s Semiconductor Cryogenics Business Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLP
Mar
10
2023
California Office of Health Care Affordability: Another Regulatory Hurdle for California Healthcare M&A Transactions? Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Jun
18
2021
FTC Lowers Reporting Thresholds for Mergers & Acquisitions MoginRubin
Oct
9
2011
The Top Five Intellectual Property Traps in M&A Transactions McDermott Will & Emery
Jan
12
2017
2016 Year In Review: Corporate Governance Litigation and Regulation Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft LLP
Aug
13
2019
Don’t Feel Bad for Protecting Your Franchise and Trademark Rights Foley & Lardner LLP
Jan
4
2018
M&A and Tax Reform—New Tax Considerations with Wide-Ranging Implications Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP
Mar
27
2023
Hot Topics in Private M&A Transactions in the UK: Macroeconomic Uncertainty, Cash Is King and Bridging Value Gaps Katten
Jul
16
2020
Up in Smoke: COVID-19’s Impacts on Hemp & Cannabis M&A Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Sep
9
2019
Court of Chancery Finds Provisions of Merger Agreement Ambiguous and Denies Telecommunications Giant’s Motion to Dismiss K&L Gates
Dec
26
2011
New Gift Card Rules from FinCEN Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP
Jun
15
2022
Rising Interest Rates Could Mean Even More M&A Deals Structured with Cash and Equity Foley & Lardner LLP
Jan
29
2018
Competition Steady Despite Disasters, Fitch Says Risk and Insurance Management Society, Inc. (RIMS)
Sep
26
2019
The Delaware Court of Chancery Enforces Clear and Unambiguous Terms of Merger Agreement in Finding Termination Fee Provision Did Not Afford Exclusive Remedy for Termination Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft LLP
Feb
4
2012
Buyers Beware: You May Be Assuming Superfund Liability in an Asset Deal Much Shelist, P.C.
Feb
8
2017
Top 10 Rules to Marketing a New Law Firm Merger or Existing “Branch” Office (Part I) Fishman Marketing, Inc.
Apr
28
2023
Early 2023 Delaware Corporate and M&A Law Review Greenberg Traurig, LLP
Jan
27
2016
2016 Automotive M&A Outlook: Mergers and Acquisitions Foley & Lardner LLP
May
4
2023
The MOAC Decision: Implications for DIP Lenders, Not Just for Asset Purchasers Polsinelli PC
Oct
28
2019
How Can Brand Owners and Retailers Proactively Manage Their Property Portfolio Costs? [VIDEO] Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLP
Apr
30
2012
Boilerplate 101: Governing Law Dinsmore & Shohl LLP
Mar
10
2015
Potential Cost Savers in German M&A Transactions – Practical Experience with Notary’s Fees McDermott Will & Emery
Nov
6
2019
Bank Strategy Briefing: Non-Bank Acquisition Strategies Godfrey & Kahn S.C.
May
27
2014
Great Hill Equity Partners and the Attorney-Client Privilege in Corporate Mergers – Have We Opened Pandora’s Box? Giordano, Halleran & Ciesla, P.C.
Jul
4
2012
Club Membership Deposits in Bankruptcy Greenberg Traurig, LLP
Mar
20
2017
Employment Authorization Issues Arising From Corporate Restructuring Foley & Lardner LLP
Apr
6
2018
The GDPR and Mergers and Acquisitions: What Corporate Buyers and Sellers Need to Know Dickinson Wright PLLC
Oct
7
2020
Acquisition of PPP Borrowers - Guidance in Changes in Ownership Hill Ward Henderson
 

NLR Logo

We collaborate with the world's leading lawyers to deliver news tailored for you. Sign Up to receive our free e-Newsbulletins

 

Sign Up for e-NewsBulletins