May 24, 2012

New Jersey Conforms Its Overtime Regulations with the FLSA, But Forgets to Retain Its “Inside Sales” Exemption

On September 6, the New Jersey Department of Labor and Workforce Development (NJDOL) enacted new regulations that conform the executive, administrative, professional, outside salesperson, and highly compensated exemptions under New Jersey's Wage and Hour Law with the same exemptions under the federal Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA). The NJDOL did so by repealing its old version of its "white collar" exemptions and adopting a new regulation that simply incorporates by reference into the New Jersey regulations the "white collar" exemptions found in the United States Department of Labor regulations at 29 C.F.R. Part 541. That change was generally considered good news for employers—with one exception.

Although well intended, the NJDOL's repeal of the prior regulations has had what the NJDOL recently acknowledged was an "unintended consequence." Specifically, the repealed New Jersey rules included a so-called "inside sales" exemption that exempted from overtime any employee whose primary duty consists of sales activity, and who receives a regular weekly rate of pay of at least $400, and at least 50% of his or her compensation from commissions-an exemption missing from the federal regulations. The NJDOL has recognized this error and has announced its intention to engage in additional rulemaking to readopt the inside sales exemption under the applicable regulations; however, that could take several months.

Employers that rely on New Jersey's "inside sales" exemption in their classification of employees as exempt from overtime should follow the NJDOL's actions closely. Such employers should also consider possible risk-mitigation strategies, and should take into account arguments that there remains no entitlement to overtime for employees who fit within the inadvertently repealed inside sales exemption during the period prior to regulatory readoption.

Copyright © 2012 by Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP. All Rights Reserved.

About the Author

Partner

Rene M. Johnson is a partner in Morgan Lewis's Labor and Employment Practice.

609-919-6607

About the Author

Partner

Thomas A. Linthorst is a partner in the Labor and Employment Practice. Mr. Linthorst represents employers in a broad array of labor and employment law matters.  Mr. Linthorst represents employers before state and federal trial and appellate courts and administrative agencies. His practice is concentrated in defending employers against wage and hour class and collective actions, whistleblower claims, and claims for wrongful termination, sexual harassment, discrimination, and retaliation. 

609-919-6642

Contributors

Partner

Richard G. Rosenblatt is a partner in Morgan Lewis's Labor and Employment Practice with offices in both Princeton and Philadelphia. Mr. Rosenblatt's practice focuses on the representation of employers in a variety of labor and employment-related matters in state and federal courts, and before numerous state and federal agencies, including the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, the National Labor Relations Board, the New Jersey Division on Civil Rights and the Pennsylvania Human Relations Commission. He also frequently handles labor arbitrations and workplace...

609-919-6609

About the Author

Partner

James P. Walsh, Jr. is a partner in Morgan Lewis's Labor and Employment Practice. Mr. Walsh represents employers in a broad array of labor and employment law matters before state and federal courts and administrative agencies, as well as in FINRA and AAA arbitrations. 

609-919-6647

Boost: AJAX core statistics

Legal Disclaimer

You are responsible for reading, understanding and agreeing to the National Law Review's (NLR’s) and the National Law Forum LLC's  Terms of Use and Privacy Policy before using the National Law Review website. The National Law Review is a free to use, no-log in database of legal and business articles. The content and links on www.NatLawReview.com are intended for general information purposes only. Any legal analysis, legislative updates or other content and links should not be construed as legal or professional advice or a substitute for such advice. No attorney-client or confidential relationship is formed by the transmission of information between you and the National Law Review website or any of the law firms, attorneys or other professionals or organizations who include content on the National Law Review website. If you require legal or professional advice, kindly contact an attorney or other suitable professional advisor.  

Some states have laws and ethical rules regarding solicitation and advertisement practices by attorneys and/or other professionals. NLR does not accept advertising from attorneys or law firms. The National Law Review is not a law firm nor is www.NatLawReview.com  intended to be an advertisement or a referral service for attorneys and/or other professionals. The NLR does not wish, nor does it intend, to solicit the business of anyone or to refer anyone to an attorney or other professional.  NLR does not answer legal questions nor will we refer you to an attorney or other professional if you request such information from us. 

Under certain state laws the following statements may be required on this website and we have included them in order to be in full compliance with these rules. The choice of a lawyer or other professional is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements. Attorney Advertising Notice: Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Statement in compliance with Texas Rules of Professional Conduct. Unless otherwise noted, attorneys are not certified by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization, nor can NLR attest to the accuracy of any notation of Legal Specialization or other Professional Credentials.