May 24, 2012

The OIG Issues An OIG Rule on ACOs and the IRS Provides Additional Guidance For Tax-Exempt Organizations

On October 20, 2011, the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) and the Department of Health and Human Services Office of Inspector General (OIG) released an Interim Final Rule (OIG Rule) providing fraud and abuse waivers for accountable care organizations (ACOs) that participate in the Medicare Shared Savings Program (Shared Savings Program). On the same day, the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) issued guidance for charitable organizations seeking to participate in ACOs and the Shared Savings Program. Each was released in conjunction with the CMS Final Rule on ACOs and the Federal Trade Commission and Department of Justice final Statement of Antitrust Enforcement Policy Regarding ACOs Participating in the Shared Savings Program. (See B&T Antitrust/Healthcare Alert, dated Oct. 26, 2011)

The OIG Rule establishes fraud and abuse waivers for certain provisions of the federal Physician Self-Referral Law and its implementing regulations (Stark Law), the federal Anti-Kickback Statute and its implementing regulations (Anti-Kickback Statute), the federal Civil Monetary Penalty Law (CMP Law) related to prohibiting hospital payments to physicians to reduce services, and the CMP Law that relates to the prohibition of inducements to beneficiaries of federal health care programs such as Medicare and Medicaid.

The OIG Rule provides for five (5) waivers, two of which were not included in the CMS Proposed Rule on ACOs, which was issued on April 7, 2010: a waiver for ACO activity prior to Shared Savings Program participation in order to accommodate start-up arrangements; and a waiver for incentivizing patients to seek preventative care. In addition to these two new waivers, the OIG Rule includes waivers for ACO participation, ACO shared savings distributions, and a Stark Law waiver. The ACO participation waiver essentially provides that the Stark Law, Anti-Kickback Statute, and the CMP Law related to gainsharing agreements would be waived for ACOs. The ACO shared savings distribution waiver waives the Stark Law, Anti-Kickback Statute and the CMP Law related to gainsharing arrangements for distributions or shared savings earned by an ACO. The Stark Law waiver provides that the CMP Law related to gainsharing and the Anti-Kickback Statute would be waived for any financial relationship surrounding an ACO that would implicate the Stark Law.

The OIG Rule will become effective on November 2, 2011. CMS and the OIG will receive and consider comments on the OIG Rule for 60 days after the OIG Rule becomes effective.

The IRS guidance issued in the form of Notice 2011-20, and a Fact Sheet, explain how the IRS expects existing guidance to apply to tax-exempt organizations, such as non-profit hospitals, that participate in the Shared Savings Program for ACOs. The IRS made clear that generally it expects ACO participation to further the charitable purpose of charitable organizations. The IRS also stated that tax-exempt participants in an ACO need not necessarily have control over the ACO in order to ensure that its participation furthers its charitable purpose. An ACO engaged exclusively in the Shared Savings Program activities can still qualify for tax exemption under 501(c)(3). Additionally, the IRS will not consider a charitable organization’s participation in the Shared Savings Program through an ACO to result in inurement or impermissible private benefit to the private party ACO participants where:

  • The terms of the tax-exempt organization’s participation in the Shared Savings Program through the ACO are set forth in a written agreement negotiated at arm’s length;
  • CMS has accepted the ACO into and has not terminated it from the Shared Savings Program;
  • The tax-exempt organization’s share of economic benefits is proportional to the benefits or contributions that it provides the ACO. If the tax-exempt organization receives an ownership interest in the ACO, the ownership interest is proportionate to the capital contributions to the ACO and all returns of capital, allocations and distributions are made in proportion to the ownership interests;
  • The tax-exempt organization’s share of ACO losses does not exceed its share of ACO economic benefits to which it is entitled; and
  • All contracts and transactions entered into by the tax-exempt organization with the ACO, its participants and any other parties are fair market value.

The IRS noted that no single factor is fundamental to avoid inurement. Additionally, a charitable organization need not satisfy all five of the IRS recommendations in order to prevent inurement or unlawful private benefit.

Further information can be obtained by downloading the Oct. 28, 2011 Healthcare Alert “Accountable Care Organizations and Shared Savings Program Final Rule.” 

© 2012 BARNES & THORNBURG LLP

About the Author

Managing Partner of the Chicago Office

Mark Rust is Managing Partner of the Chicago office of Barnes & Thornburg, LLP, and Chair of the firm’s national Healthcare Department. Mr. Rust concentrates his practice in transactional, regulatory and medical-legal issues affecting healthcare entities and provider organizations. For nearly 30 years he has written about or practiced in healthcare law, writing in a wide variety of publications from theJournal of the American Bar Association to USA Today. He is listed as a notable healthcare lawyer in Chambers USA, Top Healthcare Lawyers of...

312-214-8309

About the Author

Partner

Laura Seng is a partner in the Healthcare and Corporate Departments in the South Bend, Indiana office. She concentrates her practice in healthcare law and general business counseling, focusing on transactional and business relationship issues for physicians, professional groups and healthcare entities.

574-237-1129

Contributors

Associate

Stacy L. Cook is an associate in the Healthcare Department in the firm’s Indianapolis, Indiana office. Ms. Cook concentrates her practice on regulatory and transactional issues, including fraud and abuse laws, billing and reimbursement, HIPAA compliance, and related litigation matters, involving a wide variety of healthcare providers, including physicians, pharmacists, wholesale drug distributors, pharmacies, psychologists, physical therapists, hospital medical staffs and long-term care facilities. She has extensive experience in representing healthcare providers before state...

317-231-7509

About the Author

Associate

Carolyn V. Metnick is an associate in the Chicago office of Barnes & Thornburg LLP and a member of the firm’s Healthcare Department.

312-214-8830

About the Author

Partner

Heather Fesko Delgado is a partner in Barnes & Thornburg LLP’s Chicago office and a member of the firm’s Heathcare Department. Ms. Delgado practices exclusively in the healthcare transactional, regulatory and compliance areas.

312-338-5905

Boost: AJAX core statistics

Legal Disclaimer

You are responsible for reading, understanding and agreeing to the National Law Review's (NLR’s) and the National Law Forum LLC's  Terms of Use and Privacy Policy before using the National Law Review website. The National Law Review is a free to use, no-log in database of legal and business articles. The content and links on www.NatLawReview.com are intended for general information purposes only. Any legal analysis, legislative updates or other content and links should not be construed as legal or professional advice or a substitute for such advice. No attorney-client or confidential relationship is formed by the transmission of information between you and the National Law Review website or any of the law firms, attorneys or other professionals or organizations who include content on the National Law Review website. If you require legal or professional advice, kindly contact an attorney or other suitable professional advisor.  

Some states have laws and ethical rules regarding solicitation and advertisement practices by attorneys and/or other professionals. NLR does not accept advertising from attorneys or law firms. The National Law Review is not a law firm nor is www.NatLawReview.com  intended to be an advertisement or a referral service for attorneys and/or other professionals. The NLR does not wish, nor does it intend, to solicit the business of anyone or to refer anyone to an attorney or other professional.  NLR does not answer legal questions nor will we refer you to an attorney or other professional if you request such information from us. 

Under certain state laws the following statements may be required on this website and we have included them in order to be in full compliance with these rules. The choice of a lawyer or other professional is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements. Attorney Advertising Notice: Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Statement in compliance with Texas Rules of Professional Conduct. Unless otherwise noted, attorneys are not certified by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization, nor can NLR attest to the accuracy of any notation of Legal Specialization or other Professional Credentials.