February 8, 2012

Positive Drug Test Does Not Give Free Rein To Pre-Employment Medical Inquiries

January 22, 2010

A recent decision sends a reminder that employers cannot make pre-employment disability related inquiries, even when such inquiries are related to a positive drug test.  Prohibited questions are those “likely to elicit information about a disability.”

In Harrison v. Benchmark Electronics Huntsville, Inc., an applicant tested positive for barbiturates, which were prescribed to treat his epilepsy.  The Medical Review Officer (MRO), in the presence of the hiring supervisor, asked how long the applicant had been disabled, what specific medication he took and for how long.  The applicant reported that he had had epilepsy since he was two years old and took barbiturates to control it.  The MRO reported that the applicant had cleared the drug test, but the company, nevertheless, did not hire him.  The applicant sued claiming that even though he was not actually disabled the employer’s questions violated the Americans With Disabilities Act.

The court recognized that while a drug test to determine the illegal use of drugs is not a medical exam, employers may still violate the ADA by asking questions about current or prior lawful drug use, if the questions are likely to elicit information about a disability.  The court noted that lawful questions include: “What medications have you taken that might have resulted in this positive test result?” and “Are you taking this medication under a lawful prescription?”  However, the court concluded that the questions asked in the Harrison case may be seen by a jury as “an intentional attempt likely to elicit information about a disability.”  The court stated the employer’s right to conduct drug tests “should not conflict with the right of individuals who take drugs under medical supervision not to disclose their medical condition before a conditional offer of employment has been given.”  Importantly, Harrison involved questions asked before a conditional offer of employment was made.

In the pre-employment stage employers may only make inquiries into the ability of an applicant to perform job-related functions and/or how, with or without a reasonable accommodation, the applicant will be able to perform the job-related functions.  Employers who use pre-employment drug screens must be careful how they elicit further information about a positive drug test.  Questions asked by a Medical Review Officer or agent of the employer may result in claims under the ADA, even if the applicant is not actually disabled.

No matter what stage of the employment relationship, drug tests create potential legal issues for employers.

Copyright © 2012 Taft Stettinius & Hollister LLP. All rights reserved.

About the Author

PATRICIA ANDERSON PRYOR is a partner in the Labor and Employment Department. Ms. Pryor is an experienced litigator in both state and federal courts, representing and defending employers in nearly every form of employment litigation, including class actions. She represents and advises employers in federal and state administrative proceedings, in all forms of dispute resolution, including mediation and arbitration, and in managing all aspects of the employment relationship. She has represented employers before the EEOC, the DOL, the DOJ, the OFCCP, and the NLRB, in addition to various state...

513-357-9409

Boost: AJAX core statistics

Legal Disclaimer

You are responsible for reading, understanding and agreeing to the National Law Review's (NLR’s) and the National Law Forum LLC's  Terms of Use and Privacy Policy before using the National Law Review website. The National Law Review is a free to use, no-log in database of legal and business articles. The content and links on www.NatLawReview.com are intended for general information purposes only. Any legal analysis, legislative updates or other content and links should not be construed as legal or professional advice or a substitute for such advice. No attorney-client or confidential relationship is formed by the transmission of information between you and the National Law Review website or any of the law firms, attorneys or other professionals or organizations who include content on the National Law Review website. If you require legal or professional advice, kindly contact an attorney or other suitable professional advisor.  

Some states have laws and ethical rules regarding solicitation and advertisement practices by attorneys and/or other professionals. NLR does not accept advertising from attorneys or law firms. The National Law Review is not a law firm nor is www.NatLawReview.com  intended to be an advertisement or a referral service for attorneys and/or other professionals. The NLR does not wish, nor does it intend, to solicit the business of anyone or to refer anyone to an attorney or other professional.  NLR does not answer legal questions nor will we refer you to an attorney or other professional if you request such information from us. 

Under certain state laws the following statements may be required on this website and we have included them in order to be in full compliance with these rules. The choice of a lawyer or other professional is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements. Attorney Advertising Notice: Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Statement in compliance with Texas Rules of Professional Conduct. Unless otherwise noted, attorneys are not certified by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization, nor can NLR attest to the accuracy of any notation of Legal Specialization or other Professional Credentials.