May 24, 2012

Providing Health Services Under TRICARE No Longer Creates Affirmative Action Requirements for Health Care Employers

On December 31, 2011, President Obama signed the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012. A conference report in this Act ends OFCCP's push to expand its jurisdiction by way of TRICARE contracts. The new Section 715 of the conference report states that TRICARE managed care support contracts will not be considered contracts to provide health care services such that these providers become subject to OFCCP jurisdiction.

TRICARE is the Department of Defense health care program for active duty and retired military and their families. Prior to the law, the OFCCP took the position that hospitals and other health care providers that provided health care services for TRICARE were subject to affirmative action obligations and were subject to OFCCP jurisdiction because they were "subcontractors" under federal law. This legislative action should prevent the OFCCP from continuing to invoke jurisdiction over health care employers on the basis of their being TRICARE network providers.

Over the past few years, OFCCP has expanded its jurisdiction over the health care industry by taking the position that all providers who provided health care services under TRICARE network contracts were subject to OFCCP jurisdiction. In OFCCP v. UPMC Braddock, ARB Case No. 08-048 May 29, 2009 and in OFCCP v. Florida Hospital of Orlando, Case No. 209-OFC-00002 the OFCCP successfully argued that affirmative action obligations exist when a hospital provides health care services pursuant to a TRICARE contract with an HMO. As a result, a hospital that merely provided health care services to TRICARE recipients was subject to affirmative action obligations as well as subject to OFCCP jurisdiction.

While TRICARE should no longer create the basis for affirmative action obligations or OFCCP jurisdiction, the OFCCP may find other ways to expand jurisdiction. Further, health care providers may become subject to OFCCP jurisdiction due to other federal contract or subcontract obligations. For that reason, health care employers should always review their contracts with counsel to determine if they will create new OFCCP compliance obligations.

©2012 von Briesen & Roper, s.c

About the Author

Doris Brosnan is a Shareholder and Leader of the firm’s Labor and Employment Law Section, and focuses exclusively on assisting clients with employment issues. Doris regularly advises and trains health care, corporate and public sector organizations on how to deal with difficult employees, harassment and workplace violence, disability accommodations, FMLA and general development of effective employment policies and practices.

Doris litigates employment claims, representing clients in federal and state court and before administrative agencies and arbitrators. She also assists...

414-287-1405

Boost: AJAX core statistics

Legal Disclaimer

You are responsible for reading, understanding and agreeing to the National Law Review's (NLR’s) and the National Law Forum LLC's  Terms of Use and Privacy Policy before using the National Law Review website. The National Law Review is a free to use, no-log in database of legal and business articles. The content and links on www.NatLawReview.com are intended for general information purposes only. Any legal analysis, legislative updates or other content and links should not be construed as legal or professional advice or a substitute for such advice. No attorney-client or confidential relationship is formed by the transmission of information between you and the National Law Review website or any of the law firms, attorneys or other professionals or organizations who include content on the National Law Review website. If you require legal or professional advice, kindly contact an attorney or other suitable professional advisor.  

Some states have laws and ethical rules regarding solicitation and advertisement practices by attorneys and/or other professionals. NLR does not accept advertising from attorneys or law firms. The National Law Review is not a law firm nor is www.NatLawReview.com  intended to be an advertisement or a referral service for attorneys and/or other professionals. The NLR does not wish, nor does it intend, to solicit the business of anyone or to refer anyone to an attorney or other professional.  NLR does not answer legal questions nor will we refer you to an attorney or other professional if you request such information from us. 

Under certain state laws the following statements may be required on this website and we have included them in order to be in full compliance with these rules. The choice of a lawyer or other professional is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements. Attorney Advertising Notice: Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Statement in compliance with Texas Rules of Professional Conduct. Unless otherwise noted, attorneys are not certified by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization, nor can NLR attest to the accuracy of any notation of Legal Specialization or other Professional Credentials.