May 24, 2012

The Rising Costs of Compliance

Risk Management (RIMS)

Everyday, there seems to be a new litany of regulations for companies to follow. To this end, 86% of global compliance professionals believe that the focus on managing regulatory risk will increase in 2011, according to Thomson Reuters' "Cost of Compliance Survey 2011." 

"Even a couple of years after the height of the [financial] crisis, the depth and breadth of regulatory change -- a major driver of regulatory risk -- is still in full swing," states the report. "Much of the regulatory change is due to come into effect in 2012, leaving 2011 as the year of consultations and the need to fine tune the planned changes."

Unsurprisingly, 71% of global compliance professionals believe that their companies will need to increase the amount of time and resources required to comply with regulatory requirements. Right now, the compliance teams at 18% of companies already spend at least one full day of each week "amending policies and procedures to reflect the latest regulatory rules." Any substantial increase is sure to further strain their ability to fulfill other responsibilities.

Of course, the flipside to all this is that costs of noncompliance -- in terms of punitive fines, the ability to operate without onerous oversight and missing out on the benefits gained by the spirit of conforming with the rules -- may be even greater.

Risk Management Magazine and Risk Management Monitor. Copyright 2012 Risk and Insurance Management Society, Inc. All rights reserved.

About the Author

Senior Editor

Jared Wade is the senior editor of Risk Management magazine and the Risk Management Monitor blog.

212-655-5919

Boost: AJAX core statistics

Legal Disclaimer

You are responsible for reading, understanding and agreeing to the National Law Review's (NLR’s) and the National Law Forum LLC's  Terms of Use and Privacy Policy before using the National Law Review website. The National Law Review is a free to use, no-log in database of legal and business articles. The content and links on www.NatLawReview.com are intended for general information purposes only. Any legal analysis, legislative updates or other content and links should not be construed as legal or professional advice or a substitute for such advice. No attorney-client or confidential relationship is formed by the transmission of information between you and the National Law Review website or any of the law firms, attorneys or other professionals or organizations who include content on the National Law Review website. If you require legal or professional advice, kindly contact an attorney or other suitable professional advisor.  

Some states have laws and ethical rules regarding solicitation and advertisement practices by attorneys and/or other professionals. NLR does not accept advertising from attorneys or law firms. The National Law Review is not a law firm nor is www.NatLawReview.com  intended to be an advertisement or a referral service for attorneys and/or other professionals. The NLR does not wish, nor does it intend, to solicit the business of anyone or to refer anyone to an attorney or other professional.  NLR does not answer legal questions nor will we refer you to an attorney or other professional if you request such information from us. 

Under certain state laws the following statements may be required on this website and we have included them in order to be in full compliance with these rules. The choice of a lawyer or other professional is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements. Attorney Advertising Notice: Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Statement in compliance with Texas Rules of Professional Conduct. Unless otherwise noted, attorneys are not certified by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization, nor can NLR attest to the accuracy of any notation of Legal Specialization or other Professional Credentials.