May 24, 2012

Senate Saves Food Safety Bill

I just received this message from the Senate floor:

“Prior to adjourning, the Senate passed H.R.2751, as amended by the text of S. 510 (with Tester/Hagen Amendment) minus the offending blue slip provisions. The House now needs to vote to pass.  It then needs to be signed by the President."

MCgift-inside.jpg

Interestingly, I had been working the emails both Saturday and Sunday.  I had just sent this email when a moment later I got the above one:

I know it is an early Sunday evening in D.C. and you would much rather be home with your friends and/or families. I know, however, that you are likely still at work doing the people’s business. I would ask that you do one more of the many things that are still left to do – please encourage you bosses to put the Food Safety Bill back into play so we can see all of this hard work done.

You might know that I am a lawyer and I have represented many people sickened by foodborne illness. Here is one - http://www.marlerblog.com/legal-cases/linda-riveras-deadly-dance-with-e-coli-o157h7/ - please look at the video. Linda is still hospitalized – since May 2009.

UPDATE:  I got this email this morning: "Btw - I gave Reid a note on Friday updating him on Linda and our mtg. I'm not saying that it worked the trick...but you can if you want. :)"  And, this email too:  "House vote Tuesday."

Copyright © Marler Clark

About the Author

Managing Partner

William Marler is the managing partner of Marler Clark L.L.P., P.S.

An accomplished personal injury lawyer and national expert in foodborne illness litigation, William Marler has been a major force in food safety policy in the United States and abroad.  He and his partners at Marler Clark have represented thousands of individuals in claims against food companies whose contaminated products have caused serious injury and death.  His advocacy for better food regulation has led to invitations to address local, national, and international gatherings on food safety,...

206-346-1888

Boost: AJAX core statistics

Legal Disclaimer

You are responsible for reading, understanding and agreeing to the National Law Review's (NLR’s) and the National Law Forum LLC's  Terms of Use and Privacy Policy before using the National Law Review website. The National Law Review is a free to use, no-log in database of legal and business articles. The content and links on www.NatLawReview.com are intended for general information purposes only. Any legal analysis, legislative updates or other content and links should not be construed as legal or professional advice or a substitute for such advice. No attorney-client or confidential relationship is formed by the transmission of information between you and the National Law Review website or any of the law firms, attorneys or other professionals or organizations who include content on the National Law Review website. If you require legal or professional advice, kindly contact an attorney or other suitable professional advisor.  

Some states have laws and ethical rules regarding solicitation and advertisement practices by attorneys and/or other professionals. NLR does not accept advertising from attorneys or law firms. The National Law Review is not a law firm nor is www.NatLawReview.com  intended to be an advertisement or a referral service for attorneys and/or other professionals. The NLR does not wish, nor does it intend, to solicit the business of anyone or to refer anyone to an attorney or other professional.  NLR does not answer legal questions nor will we refer you to an attorney or other professional if you request such information from us. 

Under certain state laws the following statements may be required on this website and we have included them in order to be in full compliance with these rules. The choice of a lawyer or other professional is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements. Attorney Advertising Notice: Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Statement in compliance with Texas Rules of Professional Conduct. Unless otherwise noted, attorneys are not certified by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization, nor can NLR attest to the accuracy of any notation of Legal Specialization or other Professional Credentials.