Advertisement

May 22, 2013

Something's Gotta Give - Hotel Management Agreements Continue to Spark Interest

My unofficial assessment is that one of the best  breakout sessions, as to both content and attendance, at the 34th Annual New York University International Hospitality Industry Investment Conference was the Hotel Management Agreement panel. The panel offered an honest and in-depth assessment of most of the key hotel management agreement issues confronted in the owner-operator negotiation process. The panel provided a clear point and counterpoint from the perspective of the brands on the panel (Allison Reid of Starwood and Noah Silverman of Marriott), as well as from the owner’s point of view, provided by Greenberg Traurig’s Michael Sullivan.  

There was no big surprise or bombshell.  But there was an interesting conversation indicating that the brands are aware that hotel owners today include private equity and similar concerns.  These entities might own the hotel for a period of 5 to 7 years, which is much shorter than the term of the typical full service hotel management agreement.  Brands are now aware that something might have to "give" to keep those deals going. That "something" might include an owner’s right to terminate the management agreement upon a sale of the hotel following the expiration of a lockout period and payment of a termination fee. Certainly, the price of the right to terminate upon sale might be high, but the thought that any of the major brands might consider the concept is something to note. 

©2013 Greenberg Traurig, LLP. All rights reserved.

About the Author

Shareholder

Nelson F. Migdal focuses his practice on hotel acquisitions, operations, development and finance, large mixed-use projects, condo hotels, hotel management agreements, general commercial real estate acquisitions, commercial leasing, lender representation, and the representation of property owners on telecommunications matters.

202-331-3180

Boost: AJAX core statistics

Legal Disclaimer

You are responsible for reading, understanding and agreeing to the National Law Review's (NLR’s) and the National Law Forum LLC's  Terms of Use and Privacy Policy before using the National Law Review website. The National Law Review is a free to use, no-log in database of legal and business articles. The content and links on www.NatLawReview.com are intended for general information purposes only. Any legal analysis, legislative updates or other content and links should not be construed as legal or professional advice or a substitute for such advice. No attorney-client or confidential relationship is formed by the transmission of information between you and the National Law Review website or any of the law firms, attorneys or other professionals or organizations who include content on the National Law Review website. If you require legal or professional advice, kindly contact an attorney or other suitable professional advisor.  

Some states have laws and ethical rules regarding solicitation and advertisement practices by attorneys and/or other professionals. NLR does not accept advertising from attorneys or law firms. The National Law Review is not a law firm nor is www.NatLawReview.com  intended to be an advertisement or a referral service for attorneys and/or other professionals. The NLR does not wish, nor does it intend, to solicit the business of anyone or to refer anyone to an attorney or other professional.  NLR does not answer legal questions nor will we refer you to an attorney or other professional if you request such information from us. 

Under certain state laws the following statements may be required on this website and we have included them in order to be in full compliance with these rules. The choice of a lawyer or other professional is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements. Attorney Advertising Notice: Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Statement in compliance with Texas Rules of Professional Conduct. Unless otherwise noted, attorneys are not certified by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization, nor can NLR attest to the accuracy of any notation of Legal Specialization or other Professional Credentials.