May 25, 2012

Update: New Jersey DOL Proposes to Restore the Accidentally Omitted “Inside Sales” Exemption to State’s Overtime Regulations

On October 24, we published a LawFlash[1] discussing regulations enacted by the New Jersey Department of Labor and Workforce Development (NJDOL) conforming the executive, administrative, professional, outside salesperson, and highly compensated exemptions under New Jersey's Wage and Hour Law with the same exemptions under the federal Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA). As noted in the LawFlash, the NJDOL in its new regulations inadvertently eliminated the "inside sales" exemption that exempted from overtime any employee whose primary duty consists of sales activity, who is paid at least $400 per week, and who receives at least 50% of his or her compensation from commissions. However, the NJDOL also announced its intention to rectify this oversight by rulemaking.

The NJDOL now has taken the first step toward restoring the "inside sales" exemption under New Jersey's overtime regulations. In the November 21 issue of the New Jersey Register, the NJDOL proposed to amend N.J.A.C. 12:56-7.2(c) and restore the accidentally omitted "inside sales" exemption.

The NJDOL will hold a public hearing on the proposed amendment on Tuesday, December 13, 2011 from 10:00 a.m. to 12:00 p.m. at the New Jersey Department of Labor and Workforce Development, John Fitch Plaza, 2nd Floor Large Conference Room, Trenton, New Jersey. Those who wish to be included on the list of speakers should call the Office of Legal and Regulatory Services at 609.292.2789.

Alternatively, written comments may be submitted until January 20, 2012 to the attention of David Fish, Regulatory Officer at the Office of Legal and Regulatory Services, New Jersey Department of Labor and Workforce Development, P.O. Box 110 - 13th Floor, Trenton, New Jersey 08625-0110.

Employers that rely on New Jersey's "inside sales" exemption in their classification of employees as exempt from overtime should continue to follow the NJDOL's actions closely. It appears likely that this correcting regulation will be adopted in early 2012. While there are arguments that there remains no entitlement to overtime for employees who fit within the inadvertently repealed inside sales exemption during the period prior to regulatory readoption, employers still should consider possible risk-mitigation strategies.

[1]. View our October 24, 2011 LawFlash, "New Jersey Conforms Its Overtime Regulations with the FLSA, But Forgets to Retain Its "Inside Sales" Exemption," at http://www.morganlewis.com/pubs/LEPG_LF_NJAmendsOvertimeRegulations_24oct11.pdf.

Copyright © 2012 by Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP. All Rights Reserved.

About the Author

Partner

Richard G. Rosenblatt is a partner in Morgan Lewis's Labor and Employment Practice with offices in both Princeton and Philadelphia. Mr. Rosenblatt's practice focuses on the representation of employers in a variety of labor and employment-related matters in state and federal courts, and before numerous state and federal agencies, including the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, the National Labor Relations Board, the New Jersey Division on Civil Rights and the Pennsylvania Human Relations Commission. He also frequently handles labor arbitrations and workplace...

609-919-6609

About the Author

Partner

Thomas A. Linthorst is a partner in the Labor and Employment Practice. Mr. Linthorst represents employers in a broad array of labor and employment law matters.  Mr. Linthorst represents employers before state and federal trial and appellate courts and administrative agencies. His practice is concentrated in defending employers against wage and hour class and collective actions, whistleblower claims, and claims for wrongful termination, sexual harassment, discrimination, and retaliation. 

609-919-6642

Boost: AJAX core statistics

Legal Disclaimer

You are responsible for reading, understanding and agreeing to the National Law Review's (NLR’s) and the National Law Forum LLC's  Terms of Use and Privacy Policy before using the National Law Review website. The National Law Review is a free to use, no-log in database of legal and business articles. The content and links on www.NatLawReview.com are intended for general information purposes only. Any legal analysis, legislative updates or other content and links should not be construed as legal or professional advice or a substitute for such advice. No attorney-client or confidential relationship is formed by the transmission of information between you and the National Law Review website or any of the law firms, attorneys or other professionals or organizations who include content on the National Law Review website. If you require legal or professional advice, kindly contact an attorney or other suitable professional advisor.  

Some states have laws and ethical rules regarding solicitation and advertisement practices by attorneys and/or other professionals. NLR does not accept advertising from attorneys or law firms. The National Law Review is not a law firm nor is www.NatLawReview.com  intended to be an advertisement or a referral service for attorneys and/or other professionals. The NLR does not wish, nor does it intend, to solicit the business of anyone or to refer anyone to an attorney or other professional.  NLR does not answer legal questions nor will we refer you to an attorney or other professional if you request such information from us. 

Under certain state laws the following statements may be required on this website and we have included them in order to be in full compliance with these rules. The choice of a lawyer or other professional is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements. Attorney Advertising Notice: Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Statement in compliance with Texas Rules of Professional Conduct. Unless otherwise noted, attorneys are not certified by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization, nor can NLR attest to the accuracy of any notation of Legal Specialization or other Professional Credentials.