Intellectual Property

Intellectual property disputes take place on a daily basis in a variety of venues. From an employee’s right to a patent of company-developed products to patent wars between international companies for illegal use of a product/logo, the National Law Review is a great resource for updates on all things IP. The site covers litigation at the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) and the  Patent Trial and Board Appeals (PTAB), as well as cases in front of the International Trade Commission (ITC) for international patent disputes. The National Law Review covers cases heard by the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS), or appeals which are now sitting in front of the patent-board on Inter partes review (IPR). Additionally, the National Law Review covers cases and decisions of the Federal Trade Commission (FTC).

Copyrights, patent infringement claims, trade secrets, false advertising claims, unfair competition, and intellectual property laws which govern patent-litigation, are all areas which the National Law Review covers, in detail for readers. Patent disputes don’t only occur in the United States. When international countries including the United Kingdom, Brazil, China, India, and the European Union get involved, international laws are also taken into consideration by the PTO. Additionally, information on how to obtain patent protection internationally is also available on the National Law Review.

Intellectual property news on the National Law Review spans from topics including biosimilars, domain name registration, generic top-level domains (gTLDs), drug patents, non-compete agreements, trade secrets, and other industry-related battles which ensue, are covered on the site. Visitors can read about the latest legislation, laws, and news, as it relates to patents and intellectual property in general. Further, visitors to the National Law Review are going to find the latest stories and litigation as it unfolds in front of patent courts across the land. From email and data retention policies, patent disputes over medical devices, cloud computing and artificial intelligence the National Law Review has the details and expert intellectual property litigation legal analysis readers count on.

For hourly updates on the latest news about Intellectual Property Law, IP Litigation, Patent Legislation, and more, be sure to follow our IP Law Twitter feed, and sign up for complimentary e-news bulletins.

Custom text Title Organization Sort descending
Nov
7
2010
United States Weighs in on Myriad Genetics Case Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Aug
29
2011
REALITY BITES - Brand Protection, Reality TV Style Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Jun
1
2015
Summary of Recent Precedential Trademark Trial and Appeal Board Decisions Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Jun
3
2015
Federal Trade Commission Continues March “to Set a Standard for the Industry” with Cephalon Settlement Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Jul
27
2022
Too Many Bites at the Apple? Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Oct
4
2022
The District of Columbia Revises Ban on Non-Competes Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Sep
15
2015
Summary of Recent Precedential Trademark Trial and Appeal Board Decisions – June 2015 Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Feb
1
2023
“Not My Work”: When Artists Dispute Authorship Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Apr
30
2013
Appropriate Appropriation: Second Circuit Holds That Commentary on Original Work Unnecessary for Fair Use Defense, Only Transformative Quality Required Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Jan
19
2016
Extending Patentable Life of 3D Printers: Lesson From Pharmaceutical Industry Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Aug
1
2023
Valve Rejects Games with AI Assets Over Copyright Concerns Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Apr
11
2019
Caution to Game Companies: PTAB Continues to Preclude PTAB Challenges That It Views As Untimely Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
May
6
2019
Framing Your Pitch: A Lesson from the TTI v. IBG Cases Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Nov
21
2023
Necessity Is the Mother of Invention – But New York Law Says Employers Better Not Take the Credit Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Dec
7
2023
Getty Image’s AI Model Training Lawsuit in UK Against Stability to Proceed Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Dec
15
2023
Axonics v. Medtronic Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Jan
2
2024
The Intertwining Nature of Motivation to Combine and Reasonable Expectation of Success Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Apr
11
2014
French Court Supports Freedom of Authentication: A Win for Art Experts Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
May
14
2024
Federal Circuit Weighs in on Temporal Rigidity of the Bayh-Dole Act’s Licensing Provisions Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Sep
23
2016
Virtual Porn – Real Patent Lawsuit Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Nov
15
2016
Don’t Lose Your Digital Millennium Copyright Act Safe Harbor Protection! Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Jul
7
2020
Supreme Court sides with booking.com – generic.com trademarks not necessarily generic Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Feb
15
2017
You’re So Vague: Federal Circuit Sends IPR Decision Back to PTAB for More Thorough Analysis Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Feb
12
2021
A “Culture Of Concealment” – Scrutinizing Overbroad NDAs Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Dec
9
2014
Viability of Certain Internet and Software Patents Reconfirmed in DDR Holdings, LLC v. Hotels.com Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Mar
13
2015
The Blurred Line Between Inspiration and Copying - A $7.4 Million Copyright Question Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Nov
1
2009
Creating the (Virtual) American Dream: User-Generated Content and Trademarks in Virtual Worlds Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Aug
30
2021
Trade Secret vs. Patent – a False Dichotomy Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Aug
5
2010
Ninth Circuit Finds Employment Agreement Ambiguous As To Whether An Employee's "Ideas" Were Assigned To Employer Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Mar
27
2011
This Season, Cover Your Apps - Intellectual Property Concerns of Apps Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Nov
19
2021
New York State Employers to Require Transparency in Electronic Monitoring Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Jun
18
2011
Supreme Court Rules That Knowledge Of Patent Is Required For Liability For Inducing Patent Infringement, But Willful Blindness Is Enough Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Aug
31
2011
Recent Cases Paint Troubling Picture of Art Experts in Poland Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Sep
14
2017
Video Game Network Patent Found to Be Patent Eligible – Not an Abstract Idea Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Jul
16
2012
Supreme Court confirms that generic drug manufacturers can challenge brand-name use-code descriptions in patent litigation Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
 

NLR Logo

We collaborate with the world's leading lawyers to deliver news tailored for you. Sign Up to receive our free e-Newsbulletins

 

Sign Up for e-NewsBulletins