9th Circuit (incl. bankruptcy)

The United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, is the largest, with 29 judgeships presently hearing cases on the Bench. The Circuit was created out of the  Evarts Act of 1891, which initially established nine circuit court of appeals. Situated in the Western United States, the United States Court of Appeals is located in San Francisco, CA, at the James R. Browning US Court of Appeals Building.

There are nine states in the Ninth Circuit, and the District of Guam and District of Northern Mariana Islands also fall into the District’s jurisdiction. The Court of Appeals is in San Francisco. The District of Alaska courthouse is in Anchorage. The District of Arizona courthouse is in Phoenix. The Central District of California is in LA, Eastern District in Sacramento, and Southern District in San Diego, CA. The District of Guam courthouse is in Agana, and District of Hawaii is in Honolulu. The District of Idaho courthouse is in Boise, and District of Montana courthouse is in Billings. The District of Nevada courthouse is in Las Vegas, and District of Northern Mariana Islands courthouse in Saipan. The District of Oregon courthouse is in Portland. In the District of Washington, the Eastern District is in Spokane and Western District in Seattle, WA.

Being that it is the largest of the 13-circuits, the Ninth Circuit has 29 appointed judgeships currently sitting on the bench. This is alongside the 16 judges who are senior appointed judges. The Chief Judge for the circuit is Sidney Runyan Thomas, and the Circuit Justice is Anthony Kennedy, who is currently a US Supreme Court Justice.

Being the largest circuit in the country, several important decisions have come out of the Ninth Circuit. Mendez et. al v Westminister School District of Orange County, et al. (1947) is one of those cases. With the court sitting, en banc, the holding that Mexican-American students being placed in separate schools from those attended by a majority of the population was unconstitutional. In GlaxoSmithKline v Abbot Laboratories (2014) the court held that dismissal of jurors over sexual orientation would be barred in future cases.

The National Law Review covers similar cases as those detailed above and other types of case law. With Marijuana legalization being a hot-ticket item, several decisions have recently come in through the Ninth Circuit. Additionally, NLRB cases, employment rights, government elections and legislation, bankruptcy proceedings, and cases involving Major Corporations, have come through the Circuit. The National Law Review offers a wide range of cases in these categories, as well as news, appointments, and general information about the Ninth Circuit court system.

Custom text Title Organization Sort descending
Mar
5
2019
Ninth Circuit Holds That Statutes Do Not Constitute “Rules or Regulations of the SEC” for Purposes of Sarbanes-Oxley Act Whistleblower Claims Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Aug
20
2020
Ninth Circuit Reverses SEC Disgorgement Award and Remands in First Decision Post-Liu Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Oct
18
2021
California Broadens Security and Breach Laws, Includes Genetic Data Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
May
13
2022
Mint Gets Data Breach Claims Dismissed Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Dec
28
2023
Federal Judge Upholds California’s Small-business Lending Disclosures Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Jul
1
2010
Ninth Circuit Clarifies Rule 23 Class Certification Standard Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Sep
1
2010
Lawsuit by Deaf Employee Based on Failure to Provide Sign Language Interpreter Sent to Jury Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
May
15
2011
Federal Court Finds Allegations of "Bad Faith" in Sprinkler License Agreements to be "Vox Clamantis in Deserto" Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Feb
3
2013
Ninth Circuit Applies Securities Litigation Uniform Standards Act to Affirm Dismissal of Section 17200 Class Action Involving Variable Life Insurance Policies Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Mar
20
2013
Supreme Court Ruling Reverses Bad 9th Circuit Precedent on Class Action Fairness Act (CAFA) Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Jul
11
2014
Redbox Collection of ZIP Codes Does Not Violate Song-Beverly Privacy Rights Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Apr
28
2015
Recent Ninth Circuit Decisions in False Advertising Consumer Class Action Cases May Prevent Preemption and Relegate the Primary Jurisdiction Doctrine to Second-Class Status Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Oct
23
2017
Travel Ban: Déjà Vu All Over Again, Again Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Nov
15
2018
N.D. Cal. Releases Comprehensive Procedural Guidance for Class Action Settlements Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Mar
19
2020
Arizona District Court Tentatively Dismisses Axon v. FTC Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Dec
1
2021
Illegal Deal? Ninth Circuit Rejects Attempt to Revive No-Poaching Claims Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Oct
25
2022
The Developing “Avoided Costs” Remedy in Trade Secret Litigation Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Nov
29
2022
The Ninth Circuit Further Narrows The Meaning Of ATDS Under The Telephone Consumer Protection Act Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Mar
8
2024
Ninth Circuit Applies Adolph, Vacating Lower Court’s Dismissal of Employee’s Nonindividual PAGA Claims Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Aug
28
2009
Ninth Circuit Clarifies the Scope of Immunity for Website Operators Under the Communications Decency Act of 1996 Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Jul
8
2010
Arizona Federal District Court Holds That Securities & Exchange Commission Need Not Allege Wrongdoing On The Part Of CEO When Pursuing Reimbursement Under Section 304 Of Sarbanes-Oxley Act Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
May
16
2011
Court Tosses Transpacific Air Passengers' Claims Based on Alleged Overcharges for Flights Originating in Asia Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Dec
20
2011
Ninth Circuit Holds that an Employer Need Not Reasonably Accommodate an Employee Who Does Not Meet the Job's Minimum Requirements Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
May
13
2013
Ninth Circuit Holds that Federal Securities Laws Preempt California Labor Code's Ban on Forced Patronage at Brokerage Firms Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Jun
13
2013
Sixth Circuit Splits with Second and Ninth Circuits Regarding Need to Allege Defendants' State of Mind for Claims Challenging Soft Information Under Section 11 of the Securities Act of 1933 Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Jan
6
2015
Ninth Circuit Holds that Under Nevada Law, a Prior Stockholder’s Litigation of Demand Futility Precludes Another Stockholder From Litigating Demand Futility In a Subsequent Derivative Action Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Mar
20
2015
Uber, Lyft Decisions Highlight Difficulty of Classifying Workers in the Modern Economy Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Apr
28
2015
Baker v. Microsoft Corporation: Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals Decision in Class Action Against Video Gaming Company May Make It More Difficult to Defeat Class Actions Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
May
16
2016
Federal Trade Commission Suffers Setback in Campaign to Slow the Rising Tide of Healthcare Consolidations Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
May
27
2016
Sixth Circuit Rules in Favor of Songwriter’s Heirs in Copyright Termination Decision in Jackson Brumley et al. v. Albert Brumley & Sons Inc. et al. Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
May
15
2017
Important Open Source Ruling Confirms Enforceability of Dual-Licensing and Breach of GPL for Failing to Distribute Source Code Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Jan
19
2019
California AG Aims to Block County’s Purchase of Two San Jose-Area Hospitals Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Jun
19
2019
Ninth Circuit Fuels More Efficient Nationwide Class Settlement Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Mar
3
2014
Employees May Affirmatively Decline To Use FMLA (Family Medical Leave Act) Leave When Requesting Leave for An FMLA-Covered Reason, According to the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals Poyner Spruill LLP
Jan
17
2010
Kaiser Settles FCA Case for $1.8 Million for Hospice Billing Errors Poyner Spruill LLP
 

NLR Logo

We collaborate with the world's leading lawyers to deliver news tailored for you. Sign Up to receive our free e-Newsbulletins

 

Sign Up for e-NewsBulletins