D.C. Circuit (incl. bankruptcy)

The District of Columbia Court of Appeals is the Federal District Court in Washington, DC. The circuit is often referred to as “the District”, “Washington”, and often referred to by its initials, D.C., and is the capital of the United States.

The District of Columbia is governed by the US Constitution, which gives it the jurisdictional power to Congress, so it is not governed by any one state in the United States. The Federal District courthouse sits in the District of Columbia City Hall Building at Judiciary Square. The DC Court of Appeals and the  Superior Court of the District of Columbia make up the local court system in that district.

“The court of last resort” is often what the District of Columbia is referred to, as parties should try to have their cases settled in their respective state or circuit courts. The court has the authority to hear all final orders, specified interlocutory orders, judgments, and decisions which are made by certain government agencies in D.C. The Court is also permitted to hear cases which need to have cases which present questions of law presented by the Supreme Court heard. Given its power through Congress, the court is authorized to review proposed rules from trial courts and develop its own rules for proceedings which go through the court.

Currently there are eight associate judges and the circuit judge which are hearing cases which come through the District of Columbia circuit. At this level, judges are appointed to 15-year terms after being nominated by the President and appointed by the US Senate. Currently, the chief justice of the circuit is Anna Blackburne-Rigsby, who was initially appointed during the Clinton administration as an associate judge.

Unlike other circuits, the District of Columbia circuit issues MOJs, or memorandums of justice in cases where decisions do not result in new law. MOJs are also issued in cases where cases don’t decide on an important issue/federal question, or in cases which don’t interpret a statute or concept, which hasn’t yet been decided on. The court also publishes opinions in cases where both litigants and the trial court, create a new law, interpret statutes, or interpret important concepts in the legal system.

The National Law Review covers a broad range of MOJ findings as well as case opinions which are decided by the District of Columbia circuit. We cover: federal questions, retaliation claims, cybersecurity claims, Agency news, labor and employment, and other important federally driven cases. The National Law Review also focuses on appointments, and general news and elections , bankruptcy, tax cases, and other cases which go through the circuit’s system.   

Custom text Title Organization Sort descending
Nov
21
2013
D.C. Circuit Orders Department of Energy "DOE" to Stop Collecting Nuclear Waste Fee McDermott Will & Emery
Jun
29
2015
Court Upholds CMS' Prohibition on 'Under-Arrangements' Transactions, Strikes Down CMS' Prohibition on 'Per-Click' Equipment Rental Arrangements McDermott Will & Emery
Feb
20
2014
IRS Lacks Authority to Issue and Enforce Tax Return Preparer Regulations McDermott Will & Emery
Aug
23
2017
DC District Court Rejects Taxpayer’s Claim for US-Swiss Treaty Coverage McDermott Will & Emery
Aug
2
2018
DC Circuit Reverses Tax Court and Holds Section 883 Regulations Invalid under Chevron Test McDermott Will & Emery
Aug
3
2020
DC Circuit Upholds OPPS Reimbursement Reductions for 340B Drugs McDermott Will & Emery
Sep
22
2023
Author or Algorithm: Recent Developments at the Intersection of Generative AI and Copyright Law McDermott Will & Emery
Feb
27
2014
Feds’ Argument in Favor of Premium Tax Credit Gains Momentum, Still Under Attack in Federal Courts McDermott Will & Emery
Sep
29
2015
Royalty Allocations for Royalty Pools Must Be Well Reasoned and Based on a Record McDermott Will & Emery
Jul
6
2017
Motions in Limine Filed in Lance Armstrong/US Postal Service Litigation Raise FCA Damages, Government Knowledge and Relator Character Issues on Which Court’s Rulings May Have Widespread Impact McDermott Will & Emery
Apr
8
2019
Court Puts Association Health Plans in Limbo McDermott Will & Emery
Sep
28
2023
Standard Practice: The Public Has Right to Copyrighted Material Incorporated Into Law McDermott Will & Emery
Apr
16
2012
Federal District Court Finds Jurisdiction Exists over Foreign Parent in Pension Plan Liability Suit McDermott Will & Emery
Sep
26
2017
Medicare Appeals Backlog: A Setback and New Opportunities for Providers McDermott Will & Emery
Feb
6
2023
This Week in 340B: January 31 – February 6, 2023 McDermott Will & Emery
Jul
6
2012
Appeals Court Forcefully Validates EPA's Emerging Program for Controlling Emissions of Greenhouse Gases McDermott Will & Emery
Sep
7
2012
Divided Appeals Court Vacates Air Transport Rule Targeted at Coal-Fired Power Plants McDermott Will & Emery
Aug
9
2018
A Blast from the Past—Potentially Incorrect 1983 Medicare Reimbursement Rate Calculations May Have Significant Impact for Hospitals McDermott Will & Emery
Aug
18
2014
D.C. Circuit Appeals Court Validates FERC Regional Planning Mandate as Reasoned Evolution of the Open-Access Electricity Transmission System McDermott Will & Emery
Aug
12
2015
D.C. Circuit Declines to Eviscerate Attorney-Client Privilege in Internal Investigations McDermott Will & Emery
Sep
5
2019
Court Dismisses Challenge to TTB’s Rejection of Health Claims on Vodka McDermott Will & Emery
Mar
2
2023
DC Circuit to Disputes Ancillary to Patent Matters: “You Can’t Sit with Us” McDermott Will & Emery
Jun
1
2021
Supreme Court Update: United States v. Palomar-Santiago (No. 20-437), Guam v. United States (No. 20-382), San Antonio v. Hotels.com (No. 20-334) Wiggin and Dana LLP
Sep
8
2023
Copyright, AI and Artistic Expression: Grappling with a New Reality in the World of Artificial Intelligence Norris McLaughlin P.A.
Aug
31
2021
D.C. Circuit Court Along with Nine Other Circuit Courts Rules that USCIS Has Final Say in Visa Revocations Norris McLaughlin P.A.
Aug
26
2022
Netflix Sues Bridgerton Musical Creators for Copyright and Trademark Infringement Norris McLaughlin P.A.
Nov
26
2014
PTO Litigation Center Report – November 26, 2014 Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Oct
9
2014
PTO Litigation Center Report – October 9, 2014 Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Sep
19
2022
USCIS Releases Revised Forms I-589 and I-765 The National Law Review / The National Law Forum LLC
Apr
25
2023
H-4 Work Authorization Protections Upheld: Save Jobs USA v. U.S. Department of Homeland Security Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak & Stewart, P.C.
Nov
8
2019
Beltway Buzz, November 8, 2019 Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak & Stewart, P.C.
Mar
13
2019
Unions Challenge MSHA’s New Workplace Exam Rule for Metal and Nonmetal Mines Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak & Stewart, P.C.
Jun
25
2019
Court Rejects MSHA’s Revisions to Workplace Examination Rule Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak & Stewart, P.C.
Dec
31
2020
District Court Invalidates New DOL Wage Regulations for a Third Time in December 2020 Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak & Stewart, P.C.
Dec
31
2018
D.C. Circuit Issues Confusing Browning-Ferris Decision: Exacerbating Uncertainty Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak & Stewart, P.C.
 

NLR Logo

We collaborate with the world's leading lawyers to deliver news tailored for you. Sign Up to receive our free e-Newsbulletins

 

Sign Up for e-NewsBulletins