Intellectual Property Law

HB Ad Slot
HB Mobile Ad Slot

Intellectual property applies to many different areas of the legal world. Applying for patents for work-products, by individual employees, trademark laws, copyrights, and how companies leverage their IP asset-rights over employees, are just a few of the many areas the National Law Review covers as it pertains to IP.

Intellectual Property Litigation

Intellectual Property disputes are a complex area of law, often involving deep dives into complex concepts to understand the issues at play. In the United States, the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO/PTO) is the agency involved in registering patents and trademarks.   As part of the USPTO, the Patent Trial and Appeal Board settles patent disputes, using a variety of mechanisms to settle issues related to intellectual property.    Some of the mechanisms include inter partes review, post-grant procedures, and covered business method patent reviews.  Issues related to the America Invents Act are also settled through the PTAB. The National Law Review covers changes to standards held by the USPTO in litigation and other patent issues.  The Trademark Trial and Appeal Board settles disputes related to trademarks, such as an ex parte appeal from the denial of an application for registration by an examining attorney, and an inter partes opposition, cancellation, concurrent use, or interference proceeding.  Other agencies involved in patent disputes are the International Trade Commission (ITC) or the Federal Trade Commission (FTC).  The National Law Review covers patent news as it relates to Supreme Court (SCOTUS) and federal circuit courts’ appeals, as well as general patent litigation and new patent filings.

Intellectual Property in Drug Patents

Legal analysis related to drug patents and pharmaceuticals and the interplay with intellectual property issues are also covered by the National Law Review.   Drug patents, biosimilars, generic top-level domain registration (gTLD), trade secrets, non-compete clauses, and other patent application news are updated on the site regularly. Additionally, tangential issues that impact pharmaceutical companies, such as innovator liability and related litigation, are also analyzed by the legal experts who write for the National Law Review. 

Intellectual Property in an Employment Context

The National Law Review has legal analysis on the intersection between intellectual property rights and employment, and who owns ideas, the Work Made For Hire principle as well resulting litigation. Additionally, legislation such as the Defense of Trade Secrets Act and its impact on workplaces, and ongoing litigation related to the legislation is also covered.

International Intellectual Property

Visitors to the site will oftentimes read about international news as it relates to patent applications in the US, and internationally as well. Pharmaceutical patents in Brazil, medical device patent applications from the United Kingdom, or litigation from the European Union, China, India, and other international sectors, are often covered online. Visitors will find the latest coverage, news, and insights on patent applications and litigation, when visiting the National Law Review, for up-to-date practice-area news.

National Law Review Intellectual Property/Patent Law TwitterFor hourly updates on the latest news about Intellectual Property Law, IP Litigation, Patent Legislation, and more, be sure to follow our IP Law Twitter feed, and sign up for complimentary e-news bulletins.

Recent Intellectual Property, Patent, Trademark & Copyright News

Title
Custom text Organization
Jun
25
2019
Federal Circuit Agrees “Pharmaceutical Composition” May Be Toxic Foley & Lardner LLP
Jun
25
2019
U.S. Supreme Court Holding May Further Doom California's Model State Trademark Act Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLP
Jun
25
2019
U.S. Supreme Court Strikes Down Ban on "Immoral" or "Scandalous" Trademark Registrations K&L Gates
Jun
24
2019
Unleash Heck – Supreme Court Solidifies Position on Registrability of ‘Immoral and Scandalous’ Trademarks Greenberg Traurig, LLP
Jun
24
2019
Supreme Court to Decide Whether the Federal Circuit Can Review PTAB Determinations About Timeliness of Inter Partes Review Petitions Greenberg Traurig, LLP
Jun
24
2019
Immoral and Scandalous Trademarks Are Now Allowed According to Today’s U.S. Supreme Court Decision Davis|Kuelthau, s.c.
Jun
24
2019
Ericsson Offers FRAND - District Court Endorses Comparable Licenses, Rejects SSPPU Royalty Rate McKool Smith
Jun
20
2019
Supreme Court Update: Return Mail Inc. v. U.S. Postal Service (No. 17-1594), Quarles v. United States (No. 17-778), Parker Drilling Management Services v. Newton (No. 18-389) Wiggin and Dana LLP
Jun
20
2019
Supreme Court Declines to Address the Question of Article III Standing to Appeal a Final Written Decision from the PTAB Mintz
Jun
20
2019
The EU General Court Rules Adidas’ Three Stripe Trade Mark Invalid: “Three Stripes And You’re Out!” K&L Gates
Jun
19
2019
A Figurative Mark? A Position Mark? Or Just A Trade Mark? K&L Gates
Jun
19
2019
NLRB Aligns With Supreme Court Precedent On Nonemployee Union Organizer Access To Company Property Barnes & Thornburg LLP
Jun
19
2019
The State of Patent Eligibility – Report on Senate Hearings Foley & Lardner LLP
Jun
19
2019
Covering Your Digital Assets: Intellectual Property Rights and Gaming [Podcast] Carlton Fields
Jun
19
2019
New Versions of Iconic Designs – Can They Be Protected Under EU Design Law? K&L Gates
Jun
18
2019
Federal Circuit Clarifies Timing For Determination Of Privity As Basis To Deny Patent Challenges In Inter Partes Review Barnes & Thornburg LLP
Jun
18
2019
Criminal Statute for Organized Crime Now Available to Combat Trade Secret Theft – But What is an Act of Trade Secret Theft under Civil RICO? Mintz
Jun
18
2019
Patent Application Not Fatal To Trade Secret Claims, Federal Court Rules Jones Walker LLP
Jun
18
2019
Cutting Through the Patent Thicket – The Little Bill that Couldn’t Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Jun
18
2019
Why The TERM Act Is A Misguided Solution To A Different Problem Foley & Lardner LLP
Jun
18
2019
As the Automotive Industry Faces Headwinds, Alliances and Innovation Forges Ahead
Jun
18
2019
Sensis V Senses – Federal Court Makes Findings of Deceptive Similarity K&L Gates
Jun
17
2019
State Sovereignty 101: State Universities Not Immune to IPR Proceedings Womble Bond Dickinson (US) LLP
Jun
17
2019
Return Mail v. Postal Service: The Supreme Court Rules the Federal Government May Not Petition for Institution of Post-Issuance Patent Reviews Faegre Drinker
Jun
13
2019
Digital Copyright Directive Published…and Already the Subject of Complaint Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLP
Jun
13
2019
Senate Subcommittee Hearing of Patent Eligibility Wrap Up – Now What? Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Jun
13
2019
The Government Does Not Have Standing to Challenge Patents Under the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act (AIA) Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLP
Jun
12
2019
Federal Agencies Ruled Not ‘Persons,’ May Not Petition For AIA Reviews McDermott Will & Emery
 

NLR Logo

We collaborate with the world's leading lawyers to deliver news tailored for you. Sign Up to receive our free e-Newsbulletins

 

Sign Up for e-NewsBulletins