Intellectual Property Law

HB Ad Slot
HB Mobile Ad Slot

Intellectual property applies to many different areas of the legal world. Applying for patents for work-products, by individual employees, trademark laws, copyrights, and how companies leverage their IP asset-rights over employees, are just a few of the many areas the National Law Review covers as it pertains to IP.

Intellectual Property Litigation

Intellectual Property disputes are a complex area of law, often involving deep dives into complex concepts to understand the issues at play. In the United States, the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO/PTO) is the agency involved in registering patents and trademarks.   As part of the USPTO, the Patent Trial and Appeal Board settles patent disputes, using a variety of mechanisms to settle issues related to intellectual property.    Some of the mechanisms include inter partes review, post-grant procedures, and covered business method patent reviews.  Issues related to the America Invents Act are also settled through the PTAB. The National Law Review covers changes to standards held by the USPTO in litigation and other patent issues.  The Trademark Trial and Appeal Board settles disputes related to trademarks, such as an ex parte appeal from the denial of an application for registration by an examining attorney, and an inter partes opposition, cancellation, concurrent use, or interference proceeding.  Other agencies involved in patent disputes are the International Trade Commission (ITC) or the Federal Trade Commission (FTC).  The National Law Review covers patent news as it relates to Supreme Court (SCOTUS) and federal circuit courts’ appeals, as well as general patent litigation and new patent filings.

Intellectual Property in Drug Patents

Legal analysis related to drug patents and pharmaceuticals and the interplay with intellectual property issues are also covered by the National Law Review.   Drug patents, biosimilars, generic top-level domain registration (gTLD), trade secrets, non-compete clauses, and other patent application news are updated on the site regularly. Additionally, tangential issues that impact pharmaceutical companies, such as innovator liability and related litigation, are also analyzed by the legal experts who write for the National Law Review. 

Intellectual Property in an Employment Context

The National Law Review has legal analysis on the intersection between intellectual property rights and employment, and who owns ideas, the Work Made For Hire principle as well resulting litigation. Additionally, legislation such as the Defense of Trade Secrets Act and its impact on workplaces, and ongoing litigation related to the legislation is also covered.

International Intellectual Property

Visitors to the site will oftentimes read about international news as it relates to patent applications in the US, and internationally as well. Pharmaceutical patents in Brazil, medical device patent applications from the United Kingdom, or litigation from the European Union, China, India, and other international sectors, are often covered online. Visitors will find the latest coverage, news, and insights on patent applications and litigation, when visiting the National Law Review, for up-to-date practice-area news.

National Law Review Intellectual Property/Patent Law TwitterFor hourly updates on the latest news about Intellectual Property Law, IP Litigation, Patent Legislation, and more, be sure to follow our IP Law Twitter feed, and sign up for complimentary e-news bulletins.

Recent Intellectual Property, Patent, Trademark & Copyright News

Title
Custom text Organization Sort descending
Jan
28
2019
Supreme Court Update: Helsinn Healthcare v. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA Wiggin and Dana LLP
Apr
28
2020
Supreme Court Update: Romag Fasteners v. Fossil (No. 18-1233), County of Maui v. Hawaii Wildlife Fund (No. 18-260), Barton v. Barr (No. 18-725) Wiggin and Dana LLP
Aug
24
2020
The Department of Justice’s National Security Division Chief Addresses China’s Campaign to Steal U.S. Intellectual Property Wiggin and Dana LLP
Feb
17
2020
Humira: How far can drug makers go to protect their branded market? Wiggin and Dana LLP
May
28
2019
In Landmark Decision, Supreme Court Rules Trademark Licensees Retain Rights Even After Rejection by Licensor in Bankruptcy Wiggin and Dana LLP
Apr
12
2021
Supreme Court Update: Google LLC v. Oracle America, Inc. (No.18-956) Wiggin and Dana LLP
May
5
2020
Supreme Court Update: New York State Rifle & Pistol Ass’n v. City of New York (No. 18-280), Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org, Inc. (No. 18-1150), Maine Community Health Options v. United States, No. 18-1023 Wiggin and Dana LLP
Apr
16
2019
Forensic Science and the Authentication of Two Disputed Artworks Wiggin and Dana LLP
Jan
8
2020
Limitations and Best Practices for Using Non-Competition Agreements to Protect Company Trade Secrets Wiggin and Dana LLP
Jul
3
2020
Supreme Court Update: Espinoza v. Montana Department of Revenue; U.S. Patent and Trademark Office v. Booking.com; Nestlé USA v. Doe I; Cargill v. Doe I; Department of Justice v. House Committee on the Judiciary Wiggin and Dana LLP
Jul
11
2018
The Patent Eligibility Battle for Life Sciences Companies in a Changing Landscape Wiggin and Dana LLP
Sep
25
2018
What Start-ups Need to Know About Intellectual Property Wiggin and Dana LLP
Jun
20
2019
Supreme Court Update: Return Mail Inc. v. U.S. Postal Service (No. 17-1594), Quarles v. United States (No. 17-778), Parker Drilling Management Services v. Newton (No. 18-389) Wiggin and Dana LLP
Dec
29
2019
Supreme Court Update: Rotkiske v. Klemm (no. 18-328), Peter v. NantKwest (no. 18-801), Thompson v. Hebdon (no. 19-122) Wiggin and Dana LLP
Mar
31
2020
Supreme Court Update: Kahler v. Kansas (No. 18-6135), Allen v. Cooper (18-877), Guerrero-Lasprilla v. Barr (No. 18-776), Comcast v. National Association of African Amirian-Owned Media (No. 17-1171) Wiggin and Dana LLP
Apr
27
2020
Supreme Court Update: Ramos v. Louisiana (No. 18-5924), Atlantic Richfield v. Christian (No. 17-1498), Thryv, Inc. v. Click-to-Call Technologies (No. 18-916) Wiggin and Dana LLP
May
1
2020
Recent Supreme Court Decisions in IP Wiggin and Dana LLP
Jun
29
2019
Supreme Court Update: Department of Commerce v. New York (No. 18-966), Rucho v. Common Cause (No. 18-422), Mitchell v. Wisconsin (No. 18-6210), Carpenter v. Murphy (No. 17-1107), Iancu v. Brunetti (No. 18-302) Wiggin and Dana LLP
Dec
12
2019
Trade Secrets: What You Need to Know Wiggin and Dana LLP
Apr
3
2020
(Update): COVID-19 Is Impacting IP Filings, Litigation and License Agreements Wiggin and Dana LLP
Apr
9
2021
The Wild Wild West: How to Enforce Your Copyright on Social Media Norris McLaughlin P.A.
Aug
27
2021
Ben & Jerry’s Opposes Marijuana Company’s Pending Applications for HALF-BAKED Trademark Norris McLaughlin P.A.
Sep
17
2021
A Trademark by Any Other Name: Why the UGG Brand Left Some Australians Saying “Ugh” Norris McLaughlin P.A.
Jul
22
2022
Do You Know SKKN? No, Not That One. The Fear of Reverse Confusion for Small Business Owners Norris McLaughlin P.A.
Aug
12
2022
Avastars and Dolls and the Emerging Metaverse Norris McLaughlin P.A.
Mar
24
2023
Around the World and Back Again: Tips for Global Brand Protection Norris McLaughlin P.A.
Apr
23
2021
When It Is More Than Just a Name – Trademark Significance of Geographic Indications Norris McLaughlin P.A.
Jun
25
2021
Is a State Entity Shielded from Liability for Copyright Infringement by Sovereign Immunity? Norris McLaughlin P.A.
 

NLR Logo

We collaborate with the world's leading lawyers to deliver news tailored for you. Sign Up to receive our free e-Newsbulletins

 

Sign Up for e-NewsBulletins