Aug 31 2011 |
Recent Cases Paint Troubling Picture of Art Experts in Poland |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Aug 29 2011 |
REALITY BITES - Brand Protection, Reality TV Style |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Aug 26 2011 |
Block Your Valuable Brand from .XXX |
Bracewell LLP |
Aug 24 2011 |
Antitrust Counterclaim in Patent Infringement Action Lacks Plausible Allegations of Competitive Injury |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Aug 24 2011 |
Italian Competition Authority Finds Abusive Conduct in Withholding Data and Internal Communications Praising Company Strategy |
McDermott Will & Emery |
Aug 22 2011 |
Customer Letter Characterizing Competitor’s Patent as Invalid Not Enough to Create Declaratory Judgment Jurisdiction |
McDermott Will & Emery |
Aug 21 2011 |
Court Denies Louboutin Preliminary Injunction: Holds Fashion Blind to Single Color Marks |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Aug 21 2011 |
“Dashboard” Mark Merely Descriptive of Automotive Information Services |
McDermott Will & Emery |
Aug 21 2011 |
About Face: Lancôme's Airbrushed Makeup Ads Banned in the UK |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Aug 20 2011 |
Going Down: Means-Plus-Function Elements on Claims to Elevator Invention Are Structural |
McDermott Will & Emery |
Aug 20 2011 |
Really, “You Don’t Mess with the Zohan” |
McDermott Will & Emery |
Aug 18 2011 |
Mutual Indemnification Clause Gives Rise to Attorneys’ Fees Regardless of Prevailing Party |
McDermott Will & Emery |
Aug 18 2011 |
“Hot News” Cannot Be Enjoined Under Misappropriation Claim |
McDermott Will & Emery |
Aug 17 2011 |
Fashion Designer Allowed to Prevent Use of His Name as Community Trademark, Despite Having Sold All Trademark Rights |
McDermott Will & Emery |
Aug 16 2011 |
Broad Injunctive Relief and Damage Award for Misappropriation of Trade Secrets Upheld |
McDermott Will & Emery |
Aug 16 2011 |
Hitting Non-Practicing Entities Where It Hurts |
Hunton Andrews Kurth |
Aug 14 2011 |
I’m Singing the Blues—Sampled Song and Procedural Mish-Mash |
McDermott Will & Emery |
Aug 14 2011 |
New Dosage of a Known Pharmaceutical: Obvious? |
McDermott Will & Emery |
Aug 12 2011 |
Is the Claimed Stent Described in the Specification? |
McDermott Will & Emery |
Aug 12 2011 |
Ten Things You May Not Know About the New gTLDs |
McDermott Will & Emery |
Aug 11 2011 |
Mobile Apps and Hidden Risks |
Risk and Insurance Management Society, Inc. (RIMS) |
Aug 11 2011 |
Strict Proportionality Not Required Between Attorneys’ Fees and Damages |
McDermott Will & Emery |
Aug 11 2011 |
Lucasfilm Wins Right to Sue in UK for Infringement of U.S. Copyright |
Greenberg Traurig, LLP |
Aug 11 2011 |
Trademark Protection Strategies in China |
McDermott Will & Emery |
Aug 10 2011 |
Therasense Inequitable Conduct Guidelines Explained |
McDermott Will & Emery |
Aug 9 2011 |
Well-Drafted Patent Claims Foreclose Competition |
Much Shelist, P.C. |
Aug 8 2011 |
Federal Circuit Holds that Isolated DNA is Patentable Subject Matter |
Michael Best & Friedrich LLP |
Aug 8 2011 |
Federal Circuit Holds that "Isolated DNA Molecules" Are Patentable Subject Matter and Method Claims Merely "Comparing" or "Analyzing" Are Not |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Aug 7 2011 |
International Trade Commission Offers Guidance on Satisfaction of Domestic Industry Requirement |
McDermott Will & Emery |
Aug 6 2011 |
International Patent Protection |
Michael Best & Friedrich LLP |
Aug 4 2011 |
Myriad Federal Circuit Decision Affirms Patentability of Claims to “Isolated” DNA but Methods Involving Only “Comparing” or “Analyzing” DNA Sequences Unpatentable and No Declaratory Judgment for Those Who Simply Disagree With Patent |
Vedder Price |
Aug 3 2011 |
Wegner Paper Probes Myriad Decisions Flaws |
Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A. |
Aug 3 2011 |
Same-Sex Marriage Legalized in New York: Implications for Estate and Tax Planning |
McDermott Will & Emery |
Aug 2 2011 |
Federal Circuit Upholds the Patentability of Isolated DNA in Association for Molecular Pathology v. Myriad |
Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C. |
Aug 1 2011 |
Two New Patent Cases Join Supreme Court’s Fall Docket |
McDermott Will & Emery |
Aug 1 2011 |
Naked Licensing Defense Barred Where Licensee Previously Failed to Contest Trademark Validity |
McDermott Will & Emery |
Aug 1 2011 |
AMC v. Myriad – “Laws of Nature” Exception Does Not Include Isolated DNA |
Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A. |
Jul 31 2011 |
This (Retractable) Needle Is Going to Sting a Bit: Next Chapter in the Adventures of Post-Phillips Claim Construction |
McDermott Will & Emery |
Jul 31 2011 |
Increasing Level of Seizures by U.S. Customs |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Jul 30 2011 |
Read, Not Seagate, Controls Enhanced Damages: Spectralytics, Inc. v. Cordis Corp., |
McDermott Will & Emery |
Jul 30 2011 |
Divided Panel Finds DNA Molecules Patentable – Cancer Screening Claims Too Abstract |
Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A. |
Jul 29 2011 |
Scarlett? Rhett? Frankly My Dear, I Don’t Give a Damn: Warner Bros. Entertainment Inc. et al. v. X One X Productions et al., |
McDermott Will & Emery |
Jul 27 2011 |
Anonymous Bloggers And The First Amendment: When And How Your Company Can Identify Its John Doe Defendants |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Jul 27 2011 |
Federal Circuit Ratchets Up Materiality Requirement for Inequitable Conduct |
McDermott Will & Emery |
Jul 26 2011 |
Are Your Employees Stealing Your Data? |
Risk and Insurance Management Society, Inc. (RIMS) |
Jul 26 2011 |
Supreme Court Affirms Clear and Convincing Standard of Patent Invalidity Proof |
McDermott Will & Emery |
Jul 26 2011 |
Patent Office Proposes New Materiality Rules |
Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A. |
Jul 25 2011 |
Inequitable Conduct in Canada – Disarming the “Atomic Bomb” |
Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A. |
Jul 25 2011 |
Pleading Indirect Patent Infringement Post-Twombly |
Akerman Senterfitt |
Jul 25 2011 |
ICANN Opens Registration to New Generic Top-Level Domains |
Barnes & Thornburg LLP |