May 17, 2012

Angel Investing Principles: Doing Good While Doing Well

Recently, I attended an exploratory meeting for a possible new Wisconsin Angel fund.  Typical of these kinds of events, and gratifying as well, was the number of folks who seemed genuinely interested in participating in a fund that would promote regional economic development.  Also typical, if less satisfying, was the confusion about what “giving something back” and promoting economical development meant in terms of running an Angel fund.  Too many people seemed to think that public spirited Angel investing was about doing deals that didn’t have the growth and profitability metrics – and ultimately investment returns – offered by deals that might interest professional investors.  And that’s just silly.

Now it is true that Angel investors may be willing to pay somewhat higher prices for deals than professional investors – but even there, paying too high a price can actually kill a company if it needs subsequent funding from professional investors.  But beyond that, Angel’s are not only not helping entrepreneurs – or regional economies – when they in effect lower the performance bar for the entrepreneurs they invest in, they are hurting them.  High impact businesses – as opposed to more traditional small and lifestyle businesses – by definition compete far beyond the region (think nationally and even internationally) for people, technologies, markets and ultimately capital and exits.  Being Angel-backed doesn’t get an entrepreneur some sort of “extra credit” with customers, employees or, ultimately, with potential exit partners.  The bottom line is that Angels who tell entrepreneurs that it’s somehow ok to pretend that what’s counts is being the best of breed in the region, rather than in the relevant market space, do themselves, the entrepreneurs they invest in and their regional economies serious damage.

Now, I am not saying that good Angel investing doesn’t involve giving back to the community and promoting regional economic development.  But the giving back is not about lowering investment standards, it’s about providing more active assistance than most VCs can provide in terms of helping entrepreneurs meet those standards.  It’s about working with entrepreneurs that combine world-class ideas with the rough edges typical of high impact entrepreneurs that are new to the game and/or otherwise do not have the polish and experience – yet – to pass muster with more seasoned professional investors.  Put differently, good Angel investing is about doing good – helping raw entrepreneurs become seasoned and capable, ultimately, of being the best of breed in their market space  – and doing well – by doing the same thing. 

In conclusion, public-spirited Angel investing is a wonderful thing, so long as being public spirited is about helping entrepreneurs be the best – something that takes as much elbow grease as money – and not about throwing dollars and good wishes at deals that shouldn’t get done because it makes you feel good.

© MICHAEL BEST & FRIEDRICH LLP

About the Author

Of Counsel

Paul Jones is Of Counsel to the Business Practice Group and a member of the Venture BestSM team. His practice concentrates on representing emerging technology and life sciences companies in financing and other strategic transactions as well as general corporate matters. He also represents venture capital firms and other investors in emerging technology and other high impact businesses.

608-283-0125

Boost: AJAX core statistics

Legal Disclaimer

You are responsible for reading, understanding and agreeing to the National Law Review's (NLR’s) and the National Law Forum LLC's  Terms of Use and Privacy Policy before using the National Law Review website. The National Law Review is a free to use, no-log in database of legal and business articles. The content and links on www.NatLawReview.com are intended for general information purposes only. Any legal analysis, legislative updates or other content and links should not be construed as legal or professional advice or a substitute for such advice. No attorney-client or confidential relationship is formed by the transmission of information between you and the National Law Review website or any of the law firms, attorneys or other professionals or organizations who include content on the National Law Review website. If you require legal or professional advice, kindly contact an attorney or other suitable professional advisor.  

Some states have laws and ethical rules regarding solicitation and advertisement practices by attorneys and/or other professionals. NLR does not accept advertising from attorneys or law firms. The National Law Review is not a law firm nor is www.NatLawReview.com  intended to be an advertisement or a referral service for attorneys and/or other professionals. The NLR does not wish, nor does it intend, to solicit the business of anyone or to refer anyone to an attorney or other professional.  NLR does not answer legal questions nor will we refer you to an attorney or other professional if you request such information from us. 

Under certain state laws the following statements may be required on this website and we have included them in order to be in full compliance with these rules. The choice of a lawyer or other professional is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements. Attorney Advertising Notice: Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Statement in compliance with Texas Rules of Professional Conduct. Unless otherwise noted, attorneys are not certified by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization, nor can NLR attest to the accuracy of any notation of Legal Specialization or other Professional Credentials.