May 22, 2012

Cheaper…But Still Expensive

Conventional wisdom has it that it takes a lot less capital to build a startup tech company these days – or at least a web-based startup tech company – than it did say 10 years ago.  Many folks think that this should make it easier for flyover country entrepreneurs to compete with their counterparts in the major venture capital centers: that having big VC funds close at hand is no longer a pre-requisite for entrepreneurs in places like Wisconsin to compete with entrepreneurs in places like San Francisco.  Well – I am not so sure. 

As with much that passes for conventional wisdom, there’s an element of truth in the notion that it takes less capital to build a web-based startup today than it did in the past.  The cost of building the tech in these startups is indeed a small fraction of what the cost was a decade back.  But there is also an element of naiveté in the conventional wisdom, because while building out the tech may be cheaper, building out the company still takes, in most cases, the kind of capital that is still scarce here in Wisconsin.

These thoughts occurred to me a couple of days back when I saw that San Francisco-based Limos.com recently raised $10 million, courtesy of Austin Ventures, to become the Travelocity (or whatever) of the private limo business.  That’s ten million dollars to … build a web site to book limos?  Not really.  The site was already built (presumably with some of the $5 million previously invested by Canal Partners).  The new money will be mostly invested, presumably, in building the brand.  Because the idea that “if you build it, they will come” only works, with any regularity, in Hollywood.  In most other places, having built it you then have to tell people about it.  A lot of people.  A lot of times.  You have to build a brand, and that still takes real money.  It might even take more money today than a decade ago, when the noise level on the web was a small fraction of what it is today.  And that’s sobering for entrepreneurs (and angel investors) in places like Wisconsin, where the number of firms that can invest $10 million in a “we have the technology, now let’s build the brand” play like Limos.com can be counted on the fingers of one hand, with digits to spare.

I guess my point here is not that it’s impossible for entrepreneurs in places like Wisconsin to compete, in terms of building meaningful web-based businesses, with places like Silicon Valley, or Boston, or even Austin.  We have the technology, so to speak, and we have sufficient (there’s never enough) seed risk capital to make it work.  But we still don’t have regular access to the high seven and eight figure capital rounds that it usually takes to build a world beating brand.  Until we do, don’t look for the next Limos.com here in the Badger state.

© MICHAEL BEST & FRIEDRICH LLP

About the Author

Of Counsel

Paul Jones is Of Counsel to the Business Practice Group and a member of the Venture BestSM team. His practice concentrates on representing emerging technology and life sciences companies in financing and other strategic transactions as well as general corporate matters. He also represents venture capital firms and other investors in emerging technology and other high impact businesses.

608-283-0125

Boost: AJAX core statistics

Legal Disclaimer

You are responsible for reading, understanding and agreeing to the National Law Review's (NLR’s) and the National Law Forum LLC's  Terms of Use and Privacy Policy before using the National Law Review website. The National Law Review is a free to use, no-log in database of legal and business articles. The content and links on www.NatLawReview.com are intended for general information purposes only. Any legal analysis, legislative updates or other content and links should not be construed as legal or professional advice or a substitute for such advice. No attorney-client or confidential relationship is formed by the transmission of information between you and the National Law Review website or any of the law firms, attorneys or other professionals or organizations who include content on the National Law Review website. If you require legal or professional advice, kindly contact an attorney or other suitable professional advisor.  

Some states have laws and ethical rules regarding solicitation and advertisement practices by attorneys and/or other professionals. NLR does not accept advertising from attorneys or law firms. The National Law Review is not a law firm nor is www.NatLawReview.com  intended to be an advertisement or a referral service for attorneys and/or other professionals. The NLR does not wish, nor does it intend, to solicit the business of anyone or to refer anyone to an attorney or other professional.  NLR does not answer legal questions nor will we refer you to an attorney or other professional if you request such information from us. 

Under certain state laws the following statements may be required on this website and we have included them in order to be in full compliance with these rules. The choice of a lawyer or other professional is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements. Attorney Advertising Notice: Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Statement in compliance with Texas Rules of Professional Conduct. Unless otherwise noted, attorneys are not certified by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization, nor can NLR attest to the accuracy of any notation of Legal Specialization or other Professional Credentials.