May 23, 2012

DOL and IRS Join Forces to Crack Down on Employee Misclassification

U.S. Department of Labor (“DOL”) Secretary, Hilda L. Solis, and the Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) Commissioner, Douglas M. Shulman, signed a Memorandum of Understanding last week that is intended to improve their agencies’ coordination on misclassification issues and, ultimately, increase both agencies’ scrutiny of businesses which misclassify employees as independent contractors.

The DOL and IRS’ Memorandum of Understanding arises out of the DOL’s “misclassification initiative” to prevent, detect, and remedy employee misclassification. Connecticut, Maryland, Massachusetts, Minnesota, Missouri, Utah, and Washington have signed Memoranda of Understanding with the DOL’s Wage and Hour Division, and Hawaii, Illinois, Montana and New York have announced plans to sign similar agreements. Florida may join the misclassification initiative in the future.
The Memorandum of Understanding enables the DOL and the IRS to share information with each other regarding worker misclassification. This may lead to multi-pronged scrutiny and enforcement proceedings from the DOL, IRS and, potentially, various state agencies. Secretary Solis confirmed the agencies’ joint message: “We’re standing united to end the practice of misclassifying employees.”

As a result of the “misclassification initiative,” a worker who is classified as an independent contractor does not have to bring a claim against his or her employer alleging misclassification. Instead, the DOL, IRS and/or state agency may initiate a directed investigation which is essentially an unfettered investigation into an employer’s classification of its workers and, potentially, all of the employer’s payroll practices. In short, an audit of payroll practices. In 2012, the DOL’s Wage and Hour Division plans to increase the percentage of DOL-directed investigations to approximately 35% of all its investigations.
What does the Memorandum of Understanding and the “misclassification initiative” mean for employers? Employers who use independent contractors must be prepared to defend its classification of these workers as independent contractors or risk exposure to liability for unpaid overtime (where applicable), unpaid payroll and related taxes and withholdings, as well as liquidated damages, fines, penalties and, potentially, attorneys’ fees and costs.

The firm’s Labor and Employment Practice Group is available to assist employers with internal worker classification audits and can answer your questions regarding worker classification and other wage-and-hour issues, including without limitation, exemptions from overtime arising out of the Fair Labor Standards Act.

© Lowndes, Drosdick, Doster, Kantor & Reed, PA, 2012. All rights reserved.

About the Author

Partner

Practices

Education

  • University of Florida, 1994
  • George Washington University Law School, 1998

Admitted

  • The Florida Bar - 1998
  • U.S. District Court, Middle District of Florida - 1998
  •  U.S. District Court, Southern District of Florida...
407-418-6286

About the Author

Associate

Practice Areas

Education

  • Butler University, 2002
    Cum Laude
  • Stetson University, MBA - Concentration in Eco-Asset Management, 2007
  • Stetson University College of Law, 2007
    Cum Laude

Admitted

    ...
407-418-6447

Boost: AJAX core statistics

Legal Disclaimer

You are responsible for reading, understanding and agreeing to the National Law Review's (NLR’s) and the National Law Forum LLC's  Terms of Use and Privacy Policy before using the National Law Review website. The National Law Review is a free to use, no-log in database of legal and business articles. The content and links on www.NatLawReview.com are intended for general information purposes only. Any legal analysis, legislative updates or other content and links should not be construed as legal or professional advice or a substitute for such advice. No attorney-client or confidential relationship is formed by the transmission of information between you and the National Law Review website or any of the law firms, attorneys or other professionals or organizations who include content on the National Law Review website. If you require legal or professional advice, kindly contact an attorney or other suitable professional advisor.  

Some states have laws and ethical rules regarding solicitation and advertisement practices by attorneys and/or other professionals. NLR does not accept advertising from attorneys or law firms. The National Law Review is not a law firm nor is www.NatLawReview.com  intended to be an advertisement or a referral service for attorneys and/or other professionals. The NLR does not wish, nor does it intend, to solicit the business of anyone or to refer anyone to an attorney or other professional.  NLR does not answer legal questions nor will we refer you to an attorney or other professional if you request such information from us. 

Under certain state laws the following statements may be required on this website and we have included them in order to be in full compliance with these rules. The choice of a lawyer or other professional is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements. Attorney Advertising Notice: Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Statement in compliance with Texas Rules of Professional Conduct. Unless otherwise noted, attorneys are not certified by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization, nor can NLR attest to the accuracy of any notation of Legal Specialization or other Professional Credentials.