May 23, 2012

Ensuring That Your Commercial and Industrial Real Estate is Properly Assessed for 2011 In Light of Declining Property Values

With the sharp decline in real estate values, business property owners must take affirmative steps early in 2011 to ensure that their 2011 property tax assessments are reduced to reflect current property values, and do not continue at higher values which are above current fair market value.

In years when real estate values were constantly increasing, assessors moved annually to raise assessments in an attempt to capture those steady value increases. In a declining market, however, with municipal governments struggling to retain their historic revenue sources, assessors have not been as quick to reduce those values to reflect the current market, and business property owners thus need to be proactive on their own behalf.

In Wisconsin, assessors are not required to notify property owners of their current year assessment, or advise them of the procedures for challenging their assessment, unless the assessment is changing from the prior year. Thus, if an assessor chooses simply to leave the prior assessment in place and not reduce it to reflect declining values, the property owner will not receive any notice and will have to take timely steps to protect himself or herself.

Challenging property tax assessments is especially difficult in a declining market, since Wisconsin law requires assessments to be based on property sales, and assessors may look to the absence of current sales in a depressed market to justify reliance on earlier, pre-decline sales which do not reflect current values. Property owners thus need to be especially well prepared to challenge their assessments in a declining market.

Under Wisconsin law, 2011 assessments are made as of January 1, 2011, and will be issued beginning in April 2011. Property owners must take steps to protect themselves early in 2011.

© MICHAEL BEST & FRIEDRICH LLP

About the Author

Partner

Bob Gordon is a partner in the Tax Practice Group. His practice includes federal, state and local taxation, tax controversies, trial and appellate litigation, property taxation of commercial, industrial, utility, and special use manufacturing properties, and property tax exemptions. He has successfully argued two landmark tax cases in the Wisconsin Supreme Court (cited in Experience above), Nankin v. Village of Shorewood, which upheld the constitutional right of all Wisconsin property owners to challenge their tax assessments in court, and Deutsches Land, Inc. v. City of...

414-225-4936

About the Author

Partner

Steve Ritt is a partner practicing in the firm’s Madison and Milwaukee offices, but also spends a significant amount of time in the Chicago office on client matters. He has a broad-based business law practice that includes communications, land use, zoning and real estate law. He represents clients in the media and telecommunications industries with interests in the State of Wisconsin and other states. His experience includes a broad range of complex transactions, including a multi-user television broadcast tower and related facilities, and the build-out and property management of...

608-283-4421

Boost: AJAX core statistics

Legal Disclaimer

You are responsible for reading, understanding and agreeing to the National Law Review's (NLR’s) and the National Law Forum LLC's  Terms of Use and Privacy Policy before using the National Law Review website. The National Law Review is a free to use, no-log in database of legal and business articles. The content and links on www.NatLawReview.com are intended for general information purposes only. Any legal analysis, legislative updates or other content and links should not be construed as legal or professional advice or a substitute for such advice. No attorney-client or confidential relationship is formed by the transmission of information between you and the National Law Review website or any of the law firms, attorneys or other professionals or organizations who include content on the National Law Review website. If you require legal or professional advice, kindly contact an attorney or other suitable professional advisor.  

Some states have laws and ethical rules regarding solicitation and advertisement practices by attorneys and/or other professionals. NLR does not accept advertising from attorneys or law firms. The National Law Review is not a law firm nor is www.NatLawReview.com  intended to be an advertisement or a referral service for attorneys and/or other professionals. The NLR does not wish, nor does it intend, to solicit the business of anyone or to refer anyone to an attorney or other professional.  NLR does not answer legal questions nor will we refer you to an attorney or other professional if you request such information from us. 

Under certain state laws the following statements may be required on this website and we have included them in order to be in full compliance with these rules. The choice of a lawyer or other professional is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements. Attorney Advertising Notice: Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Statement in compliance with Texas Rules of Professional Conduct. Unless otherwise noted, attorneys are not certified by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization, nor can NLR attest to the accuracy of any notation of Legal Specialization or other Professional Credentials.