Advertisement

May 21, 2013

Entrepreneur’s Guide to Intellectual Property – Blog Series: Trade Secrets: What Are They and How Do I Protect Them? (Part 1)

Background

A patent is the form of intellectual property that most commonly comes to mind with respect to new innovations. A patent provides a government endorsed monopoly to prevent others from making, using or selling an invention for 20 years from the filing of a patent application. The invention may be a new apparatus, a composition, an article of manufacture or a process that meets the statutory requirements for patentability. The invention must be both new and non-obvious. 

Getting a patent can be a rigorous, expensive and time-consuming activity, usually costing thousands of dollars and taking years to obtain. One of the principal drawbacks of patent protection is that the applicant for such protection must fully disclose how the technology works, and the best way to practice it, such that another engineer or scientist can use the patent as a blue print to reproduce the invention. This disclosure is provided to the public upon publication of the patent application, which occurs before the patent office has even decided whether the invention is protectable or not. Under the patent system, therefore, the innovator will be disclosing his or her invention to the public without being certain whether any protection will be ultimately available, or what the full scope of that protection will be. 

Trade secret protection can provide an alternative form of intellectual property protection that does not have the same limitations as patent protection, though it has its own specific limitations. 

What is a trade secret?

A trade secret is generally any information that derives economic value (actual or potential), from not being generally known to, and not being readily ascertainable by proper means by other persons. The information to be protected as a trade secret must meet two requirements:

  1. The information must be a secret (i.e. not public knowledge or general knowledge in an industry.
  2. The information must be subject to “reasonable efforts” to be kept a secret. 

Reasonable Efforts
What constitutes “reasonable efforts” depends on the information to be protected and the general practices for a specific industry. “Reasonable efforts” does not mean all conceivable efforts. 

Generally “reasonable efforts” include the use of confidentiality/non-disclosure agreements, security precautions (locks, passwords, badges, etc.), and “need to know” compartmentalization of knowledge to keep information secret. Trade secret protection is handled under individual state law and common law, with most states having enacted the Uniform Trade Secrets Act governing the protection of such rights.

Advantages and Disadvantages

Trade secrets have several benefits over the patent protection. First, a trade secret is not limited to a specific term, but can be protected indefinitely as long as the information is preserved as a secret and retains its economic value. Second, trade secrets can protect innovations that may not meet the statutory requirements for patentability. Finally, trade secret innovations are not published and available to the public. 

However, there are limitations to the protection of trade secrets. One significant drawback to trade secrets is that they do not protect against independent development. For instance, if a competitor would develop a process or system similar or identical to an innovator’s process or system without obtaining or referencing the innovators trade secret (i.e. did not obtain by theft, espionage, or disclosure by former employee of innovator), the trade secret would not protect against this independent development. Another drawback is that the innovator must take continual “reasonable efforts” to keep the innovation a trade secret, and if the “reasonable efforts” lapse, even if only in one specific instance, the trade secret protection can be lost. One more drawback is that certain types of innovations may not be able to be maintained as a trade secret. For example, if the trade secret can be determined by reverse engineering, its status as a trade secret may be lost. 

The table below summarizes the differences between patent protection and trade secret protection:

Patent v. Trade Secret Protection

  Patents Trade Secrets
What is protected? Inventions Any information you do not want your competitors to know
What are the requirements? The invention must be new, useful, and non-obvious The trade secret must, in fact, be a secret and maintained as such through appropriate business practices
How long does protection last? 20 years from filing and a minimum of 17 years Indefinitely
What are the costs? Filing, prosecution, maintenance, and enforcement Establishing procedures and keeping key employees
How long does it take to secure rights? Two to five years As long as it takes to establish and maintain internal company procedures
How can competitors defeat my rights?
  • Invent and file first
  • Challenge the validity of my patent
  • Design around my patent
  • Invent and publish
  • Hire away key employees
  • Reverse-engineer the product
  • Patent my trade secret
How can I defeat my own rights?
  • Publicly use the invention for more than one year before filing a patent application
  • Sell (or offer to sell) the invention more than one year before filing the patent application
  • Accidentally disclose a trade secret
  • Fail to retain key employees
  • Try to getU.S.and foreign patents and have patent application published by USPTO
© MICHAEL BEST & FRIEDRICH LLP

About the Author

Eric. F. Severson Attorney Michael Best Friedrich LLP
Member of the Intellectual Property Practice Group

Eric Severson is a member of the Intellectual Property Practice Group in the Madison office.

Prior Work Experience

Prior to working at Michael Best, Mr. Severson served in the Navy as a submarine officer where he supervised the operation and maintenance of naval nuclear reactors. Mr. Severson has experience with a variety of mechanical, electro-mechanical, and power-generation systems. He also worked as a judicial intern for Justice David Prosser of the Wisconsin Supreme Court while in law school.

Honors and Recognitions

While in law school, Mr....

608-283-2279

Boost: AJAX core statistics

Legal Disclaimer

You are responsible for reading, understanding and agreeing to the National Law Review's (NLR’s) and the National Law Forum LLC's  Terms of Use and Privacy Policy before using the National Law Review website. The National Law Review is a free to use, no-log in database of legal and business articles. The content and links on www.NatLawReview.com are intended for general information purposes only. Any legal analysis, legislative updates or other content and links should not be construed as legal or professional advice or a substitute for such advice. No attorney-client or confidential relationship is formed by the transmission of information between you and the National Law Review website or any of the law firms, attorneys or other professionals or organizations who include content on the National Law Review website. If you require legal or professional advice, kindly contact an attorney or other suitable professional advisor.  

Some states have laws and ethical rules regarding solicitation and advertisement practices by attorneys and/or other professionals. NLR does not accept advertising from attorneys or law firms. The National Law Review is not a law firm nor is www.NatLawReview.com  intended to be an advertisement or a referral service for attorneys and/or other professionals. The NLR does not wish, nor does it intend, to solicit the business of anyone or to refer anyone to an attorney or other professional.  NLR does not answer legal questions nor will we refer you to an attorney or other professional if you request such information from us. 

Under certain state laws the following statements may be required on this website and we have included them in order to be in full compliance with these rules. The choice of a lawyer or other professional is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements. Attorney Advertising Notice: Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Statement in compliance with Texas Rules of Professional Conduct. Unless otherwise noted, attorneys are not certified by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization, nor can NLR attest to the accuracy of any notation of Legal Specialization or other Professional Credentials.