Advertisement

June 19, 2013

First to File For Divorce: “Timing is Everything”

After a person makes the tough choice to proceed with a divorce, he or she often inquires as to whether it or not it will make a difference if they are the first to file their petition for divorce. As the saying goes, “timing is everything”, and this is often true when making a decision on the right time to file for divorce.

 From a legal perspective, there are several reasons why a person may be advised to file for divorce on an expedited basis making that party the first to file. The date that a petition for dissolution of marriage is filed sets the “cut off” date for determining whether assets and/or liabilities are marital or non-marital. By way of example, a person may be expecting a large sum of money, and he or she wants to avoid sharing the sum of money with their soon-to-be former spouse. Generally,  the anticipated sum of money received after the date of filing would be that spouse’s non-marital monies unless it had some marital ties or came from marital efforts. For example, if a person received a bonus that was awarded based upon retention versus performance, the person’s retention bonus, if received post-filing, would be that spouse’s non-marital monies.  Alternatively, if it was based on work performance that occurred during the marriage, it would be marital.

Another reason a spouse may be in a rush to file is to avoid having their marriage reach an anniversary that would put the length of their marriage in a category that may give rise to a certain form of alimony. The length of marriage for purposes of the Florida alimony statute is the period of time from the date of marriage until the date that the petition is filed. So, for example, a person who has been married to his spouse for just under 17 years might be rushed to file before the 17-year anniversary, because marriage that is greater than 17 years is considered to be a long-term marriage where permanent periodic alimony may be awarded if the facts of the case make it appropriate to do so. The length of marriage alone is not an absolute trigger for a different kind of alimony, instead it is a factor to consider.  These are just a few legal ramifications for pulling the trigger to file.

 In addition to certain legal issues associated with the timing of filing, however,  there are also some emotional issues involved with being the first to file, including the resulting and often highly emotional impact that it will have on the other spouse.  The spouse that is on the receiving end may use it against the spouse that filed by claiming, for example, “you initiated the divorce by filing first, so you are the one that wanted it.” While this may appear childish, it is certainly not uncommon for a spouse to make these claims, and such statements, and the emotions behind them often play a part in how the divorce action proceeds.

 As a result, practitioners will often weigh the legal issues against the emotional issues when assisting a party with making a determination as to whether that spouse should be the first to file, and often the legal issues will prevail. Nevertheless, it is an important decision that should be vetted with an attorney specializing in the area of Family Law.

© Lowndes, Drosdick, Doster, Kantor & Reed, PA, 2013. All rights reserved.

About the Author

Senior Associate

Nicole Park is an associate in the Family and Marital Law practice. Her areas of representation include dissolution of marriage, child support, child custody, alimony, and relocation. Nicole has experience with family law litigation involving complex financial matters and sensitive parenting issues.

407-418-6397

Boost: AJAX core statistics

Legal Disclaimer

You are responsible for reading, understanding and agreeing to the National Law Review's (NLR’s) and the National Law Forum LLC's  Terms of Use and Privacy Policy before using the National Law Review website. The National Law Review is a free to use, no-log in database of legal and business articles. The content and links on www.NatLawReview.com are intended for general information purposes only. Any legal analysis, legislative updates or other content and links should not be construed as legal or professional advice or a substitute for such advice. No attorney-client or confidential relationship is formed by the transmission of information between you and the National Law Review website or any of the law firms, attorneys or other professionals or organizations who include content on the National Law Review website. If you require legal or professional advice, kindly contact an attorney or other suitable professional advisor.  

Some states have laws and ethical rules regarding solicitation and advertisement practices by attorneys and/or other professionals. NLR does not accept advertising from attorneys or law firms. The National Law Review is not a law firm nor is www.NatLawReview.com  intended to be an advertisement or a referral service for attorneys and/or other professionals. The NLR does not wish, nor does it intend, to solicit the business of anyone or to refer anyone to an attorney or other professional.  NLR does not answer legal questions nor will we refer you to an attorney or other professional if you request such information from us. 

Under certain state laws the following statements may be required on this website and we have included them in order to be in full compliance with these rules. The choice of a lawyer or other professional is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements. Attorney Advertising Notice: Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Statement in compliance with Texas Rules of Professional Conduct. Unless otherwise noted, attorneys are not certified by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization, nor can NLR attest to the accuracy of any notation of Legal Specialization or other Professional Credentials.