February 8, 2012

Illinois Employers Can No Longer Use Credit Checks in Employment Decisions Under Most Circumstances

On August 10, 2010, Governor Quinn signed into law the Employee Credit Privacy Act (the “Act”). The new law prohibits employers from inquiring about or using a current or prospective employee's credit history as a basis for employment, recruitment, discharge, or compensation. The Act also prohibits Illinois employers from running credit checks on job applicants, except under limited circumstances. An employer caught accessing such information may be sued and ordered to pay damages, including attorneys’ fees. The new law further prohibits an employer from retaliating or discriminating against a person who files a complaint under the Act, participates in an investigation, proceeding, or action concerning a violation of the Act or opposes a violation of the Act.

Exceptions to the law allow pre-employment credit checks under limited circumstances. The law specifically excludes banks, savings and loan associations, financial institutions, debt collectors, insurance companies and surety businesses from the credit check prohibition. The law also allows employers to use credit information where such information is related to a bona fide occupation qualification for a particular position or group of employees. This exception applies to positions involving money-handling or other confidential job duties, such as those positions where: (1) state or federal law requires bonding of an individual holding the position; (2) job duties include access to $1,000 in cash or assets; (3) job duties include signatory power of business assets of $100 or more per transaction; (4) employees are in a managerial position that involves setting direction or control of the business; or (5) employees who have access to confidential information, financial information or trade secrets. Notably, the law contemplates that future administrative regulations, as well as state or federal Departments of Labor, may define additional categories of bona fide occupational requirements permitting exceptions to this Act.

Rep. Jack Franks, D-Woodstock, originally introduced this Bill. Franks argued that bad credit is not necessarily a sign of financial irresponsibility, especially when unemployment in Illinois is at 11 percent and 20 percent of homeowners owe more on their home than it is worth. Franks added that victims of identity theft who have had their credit ruined often find it difficult to gain employment if they are subject to a pre-employment credit check.

The new law takes effect on January 1, 2011.

© MICHAEL BEST & FRIEDRICH LLP

About the Author

Partner

Dan Kaufman is the Managing Partner of the Chicago office, Co-Chair of the Class Action/MDL Team and a member of the Labor and Employment Relations and Education Practice Groups, and the Trade Secret Protection and Non-Competition Team. He served on the Management Committee from 2000-2003 and as Managing Partner of the Chicago office from 1996-2000.

312-836-5077

Boost: AJAX core statistics

Legal Disclaimer

You are responsible for reading, understanding and agreeing to the National Law Review's (NLR’s) and the National Law Forum LLC's  Terms of Use and Privacy Policy before using the National Law Review website. The National Law Review is a free to use, no-log in database of legal and business articles. The content and links on www.NatLawReview.com are intended for general information purposes only. Any legal analysis, legislative updates or other content and links should not be construed as legal or professional advice or a substitute for such advice. No attorney-client or confidential relationship is formed by the transmission of information between you and the National Law Review website or any of the law firms, attorneys or other professionals or organizations who include content on the National Law Review website. If you require legal or professional advice, kindly contact an attorney or other suitable professional advisor.  

Some states have laws and ethical rules regarding solicitation and advertisement practices by attorneys and/or other professionals. NLR does not accept advertising from attorneys or law firms. The National Law Review is not a law firm nor is www.NatLawReview.com  intended to be an advertisement or a referral service for attorneys and/or other professionals. The NLR does not wish, nor does it intend, to solicit the business of anyone or to refer anyone to an attorney or other professional.  NLR does not answer legal questions nor will we refer you to an attorney or other professional if you request such information from us. 

Under certain state laws the following statements may be required on this website and we have included them in order to be in full compliance with these rules. The choice of a lawyer or other professional is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements. Attorney Advertising Notice: Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Statement in compliance with Texas Rules of Professional Conduct. Unless otherwise noted, attorneys are not certified by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization, nor can NLR attest to the accuracy of any notation of Legal Specialization or other Professional Credentials.