Advertisement

May 21, 2013

Maryland may become first state to ban employers from asking applicants and employees for access to their social media accounts

We’ve been following the issue of employers asking applicants and employees for access to their social media accounts. Despite limited data of how widespread this practice is, the issue has attracted national attention due in part to a recent AP story and activism by civil liberties groups.

Maryland moved significantly closer to becoming the first state to ban employers from asking applicants or employees for access to their social media accounts when its General Assembly passed a pair of bills—S.B. 433 and H.B. 964—over the weekend. The introduction of the legislation was driven in part by the account of a state Department of Corrections officer, who alleged that he was forced to give his interviewer his Facebook account information during his recertification interview.

If signed by Governor O’Malley, the law, which is effective October 1, 2012, would make it unlawful for an employer to “discharge, discipline or otherwise penalize or threaten to discharge, discipline or otherwise penalize” an employee or applicant for refusing to disclose their usernames or passwords for social media sites. The law also makes it unlawful for an employer to refuse to hire an applicant who refused to disclose the same information.

We will continue to track this legislation and update you if it is signed into law. In the meantime, employers should be mindful of current and pending federal legislation that could create risks if they ask applicants for access to their social media sites.

©2013 Greenberg Traurig, LLP. All rights reserved.

About the Author

Associate

Justin F. Keith is an associate in the Boston office of Greenberg Traurig, LLP. He represents employers in all areas of labor and employment law, including litigation of discrimination, harassment and retaliation claims, reductions in force, and numerous other personnel and workplace issues. He frequently represents employers in wage & hour class and collective actions in state and federal court.  

617-310-6230

Boost: AJAX core statistics

Legal Disclaimer

You are responsible for reading, understanding and agreeing to the National Law Review's (NLR’s) and the National Law Forum LLC's  Terms of Use and Privacy Policy before using the National Law Review website. The National Law Review is a free to use, no-log in database of legal and business articles. The content and links on www.NatLawReview.com are intended for general information purposes only. Any legal analysis, legislative updates or other content and links should not be construed as legal or professional advice or a substitute for such advice. No attorney-client or confidential relationship is formed by the transmission of information between you and the National Law Review website or any of the law firms, attorneys or other professionals or organizations who include content on the National Law Review website. If you require legal or professional advice, kindly contact an attorney or other suitable professional advisor.  

Some states have laws and ethical rules regarding solicitation and advertisement practices by attorneys and/or other professionals. NLR does not accept advertising from attorneys or law firms. The National Law Review is not a law firm nor is www.NatLawReview.com  intended to be an advertisement or a referral service for attorneys and/or other professionals. The NLR does not wish, nor does it intend, to solicit the business of anyone or to refer anyone to an attorney or other professional.  NLR does not answer legal questions nor will we refer you to an attorney or other professional if you request such information from us. 

Under certain state laws the following statements may be required on this website and we have included them in order to be in full compliance with these rules. The choice of a lawyer or other professional is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements. Attorney Advertising Notice: Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Statement in compliance with Texas Rules of Professional Conduct. Unless otherwise noted, attorneys are not certified by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization, nor can NLR attest to the accuracy of any notation of Legal Specialization or other Professional Credentials.