July 22, 2014

New U.S. Department of Labor’s Office of Federal Contract Compliance Programs (OFCCP) Final Rules Require Federal Contractors to Increase Efforts to Hire Veterans and Disabled Individuals

The U.S. Department of Labor’s Office of Federal Contract Compliance Programs (OFCCP) recently issued much-anticipated Final Rules that will require federal contractors to engage in specific and measurable recruitment efforts to hire veterans and persons with disabilities.

These Final Rules formally take effect 180 days after being published in the Federal Register. The new regulations make significant changes to the Vietnam Era Veterans’ Readjustment and Assistance Act (VEVRAA) and Section 503 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973. For the past two years, federal contractors have anticipated that these rules would take effect. With the Obama Administration’s recent appointment of Tom Perez as Secretary of Labor, the enactment of these new regulations signals a renewed focus on increasing the numbers of veterans and disabled individuals in the U.S. workforce.

As applied to VEVRAA, the Final Rule largely formalizes recruitment practices that, up until recently, have been considered “good faith efforts.” Here is a summary of significant changes to VEVRAA:

  • Use of Benchmarks: The OFCCP’s Final Rule requires contractors to establish annual benchmarks to measure progress in hiring veterans. Contractors can either use a benchmark equal to the national percentage of veterans in the workforce, or contractors can set their own benchmarks based upon data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS). Because this data has not yet been posted, it remains unclear which method will be most beneficial to contractors.

  • Data Analysis & Retention: Contractors are now required to conduct qualitative analysis of hiring data based upon veteran status. Data must be retained for three years (an increase over the existing requirement to retain data for two years).

  • Invitation to Self-Identify: Contractors must now give applicants the opportunity to self-identify at both pre-offer and post offer stages of the hiring process (previous regulations required only post-offer self-ID of veteran status).

Noticeably absent from the VEVRAA Final Rule is a requirement that contractors engage in “linkage agreements” with recruitment sources. The inclusion of such requirement in previous versions of the revised VEVRAA regulations created a significant amount of confusion among the federal contractor community. Its exclusion suggests that the OFCCP has acknowledged that linkage agreements would not effectively lead to increased numbers of veterans entering the workforce.

With regard to Section 503, the Final Rule includes significant requirements for federal contractors, but some uncertainty still exists as to how contractors may legally ask about disability status at the pre-offer hiring stage. The following is a summary of major changes to Section 503:

  • Utilization Goal of 7 percent: The OFCCP’s Final Rule now requires that contractors strive to hire individuals with disabilities (“IWDs”) to comprise at least 7 percent employees in each job group. The Final Rule incorporates the definition of disability used by the Americans with Disabilities Amendment Act (ADAAA).

  • Data Analysis & Retention: The Final Rule now requires contractors to conduct qualitative analyses of disabled applicants and those hired, and to set goals in the Affirmative Action Plans. Data must be retained for three years (an increase over the existing requirement to retain data for two years).

  • Invitation to Self-Identify: The Final Rule now requires contractors to allow applicants to self-identify as disabled at both the pre-offer and post-offer hiring stages. However, as mentioned, the OFCCP has not yet provided specific language that contractors can use to ask about applicants’ disabilities while remaining in compliance with the non-discrimination requirements of the ADAAA. Although the EEOC issued an opinion letter on August 8, 2013 indicating that such practice would not violate the ADAAA, the use of disability as a pre-offer employment inquiry may lead to an increase in EEOC Charges and failure-to-hire complaints. This significant change highlights the importance of clearly communicating valid reasons for non-selection to applicants in efforts to avoid this unintended (but likely) result.

In sum, the OFCCP’s Final Rules create an increased number of data retention and recruitment requirements. Federal contractors should contact their legal counsel for advice on how best to proceed with training and preparing recruiters and hiring managers. Legal counsel can also assist federal contractors determine the best means for conducting self-audits, reconfiguring HRIS systems to include the new self-ID categories, and adopting other recruiting practices that will lead to increased numbers of veterans and disabled persons in their companies.


About the Author

Janilyn Daub, Labor and Employment Attorney, Barnes Thornburg, Law firm

Janilyn Brouwer Daub is a partner and the administrator of the Labor and Employment Law Department of Barnes & Thornburg LLP’s South Bend and Elkhart, Indiana offices.


About the Author

Roy A. Ginsburg, Labor and Employment Attorney, Barnes Thornburg, Law Firm

Roy A. Ginsburg is a partner in Barnes & Thornburg LLP’s Minneapolis, Minnesota, office and a member of the firm’s Labor & Employment Law Department.

Mr. Ginsburg has represented private and public companies for more than 30 years in employment and commercial litigation within his national practice. He has litigation experience in various employment law disputes, including trade secret misappropriation, usurpation of corporate opportunity, corporate raiding, breach of fiduciary duty, and breach of employment-related contracts, such as restrictive covenants and...

Teresa Jakubowski, Labor and Employment Attorney, Barnes Thornburg, Law firm

Teresa L. Jakubowski is a partner in Barnes & Thornburg LLP's Washington, D.C. office where she practices labor and employment law and is a member of the firm’s Disability Law Practice. Her practice includes providing legal counsel and representing clients in litigation and administrative proceedings in the areas of employment law, particularly discrimination/equal employment matters; the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA); the Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993 (FMLA); wrongful discharge; state employment laws; fair housing; and accessibility for...


About the Author

Mark Kittaka, Labor and Employment Attorney, Barnes Thornburg, Law Firm

Mark S. Kittaka is a partner and the administrator of the Labor and Employment Law Department of Barnes & Thornburg LLP’s Fort Wayne, Indiana office. Mr. Kittaka’s practice covers all areas of labor and employment law including federal and state litigation concerning discriminatory practices and retaliation claims, including, but not limited to: Title VII race, sex, color, and religious discrimination claims; the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) (disability discrimination, reasonable accommodation, interactive process); Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA); the...


About the Author

John Koenig, Labor and Employment Attorney, Barnes Thornburg, Law Firm

John T.L. Koenig is a partner in the Atlanta office of Barnes & Thornburg LLP within the Labor and Employment Law Department. He maintains a full-service practice representing employers throughout the country in virtually all aspects of both traditional labor and employment law.


About the Author

Peter A. Morse, Jr., Barnes Thornburg Law firm, Labor Law attorney

Peter Morse is a partner and the administrator of the Labor and Employment Department in Indianapolis, the firm’s largest office. He also co-chairs the firm’s Global Services Practice Group.


Boost: AJAX core statistics

Legal Disclaimer

You are responsible for reading, understanding and agreeing to the National Law Review's (NLR’s) and the National Law Forum LLC's  Terms of Use and Privacy Policy before using the National Law Review website. The National Law Review is a free to use, no-log in database of legal and business articles. The content and links on are intended for general information purposes only. Any legal analysis, legislative updates or other content and links should not be construed as legal or professional advice or a substitute for such advice. No attorney-client or confidential relationship is formed by the transmission of information between you and the National Law Review website or any of the law firms, attorneys or other professionals or organizations who include content on the National Law Review website. If you require legal or professional advice, kindly contact an attorney or other suitable professional advisor.  

Some states have laws and ethical rules regarding solicitation and advertisement practices by attorneys and/or other professionals. The National Law Review is not a law firm nor is  intended to be  a referral service for attorneys and/or other professionals. The NLR does not wish, nor does it intend, to solicit the business of anyone or to refer anyone to an attorney or other professional.  NLR does not answer legal questions nor will we refer you to an attorney or other professional if you request such information from us. 

Under certain state laws the following statements may be required on this website and we have included them in order to be in full compliance with these rules. The choice of a lawyer or other professional is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements. Attorney Advertising Notice: Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Statement in compliance with Texas Rules of Professional Conduct. Unless otherwise noted, attorneys are not certified by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization, nor can NLR attest to the accuracy of any notation of Legal Specialization or other Professional Credentials.

The National Law Review - National Law Forum LLC 4700 Gilbert Ave. Suite 47 #230 Western Springs, IL 60558  Telephone  (708) 357-3317 If you would ike to contact us via email please click here.