February 22, 2012

OIG’s Most Wanted List

The Office of the Inspector General in the United States Department of Health and Human Services has long maintained a website listing their “most wanted” health care fugitives.  The individuals contained on this list are wanted on charges related to health care fraud and abuse, ranging from billing the Medicare program for services that were not provided or were not medically necessary, to paying kickbacks to Medicare beneficiaries to induce them to cooperate in submissions of false claims.  The most wanted list is one of the tools the government uses in its health care fraud enforcement efforts.

Today, the OIG’s office announced a new “most wanted” list – this one is for “deadbeat parents,” those parents who do not pay court ordered child support payments and fall under federal jurisdiction.  While most child support payment issues are handled by the States, the federal government can get involved if the child lives in a different state from the parent who owes the child support, and the parent has been in arrears for over one year or owes more than $5,000.  The federal government can also get involved if the parent flees the state or country in order to avoid child support payments.   The number one fugitive on this list owes more than a million dollars in child support payments.

© 2012 Giordano, Halleran & Ciesla, P.C. All Rights Reserved

About the Author

Shareholder

Ms. Hunt devotes her practice primarily to Health Care Law. She counsels both individuals and entities, and advises clients with regard to pertinent legal developments facing health care providers in the modern health care environment. She also advises nonprofit clients regarding proper formation, obtaining and maintaining tax exempt status, and compliance with regulatory restrictions on tax exempt entities including the intermediate sanctions provisions.

Ms. Hunt represents health care providers and individual practitioners in the preparation and negotiation of contracts including...

(732) 741-3900

Boost: AJAX core statistics

Legal Disclaimer

You are responsible for reading, understanding and agreeing to the National Law Review's (NLR’s) and the National Law Forum LLC's  Terms of Use and Privacy Policy before using the National Law Review website. The National Law Review is a free to use, no-log in database of legal and business articles. The content and links on www.NatLawReview.com are intended for general information purposes only. Any legal analysis, legislative updates or other content and links should not be construed as legal or professional advice or a substitute for such advice. No attorney-client or confidential relationship is formed by the transmission of information between you and the National Law Review website or any of the law firms, attorneys or other professionals or organizations who include content on the National Law Review website. If you require legal or professional advice, kindly contact an attorney or other suitable professional advisor.  

Some states have laws and ethical rules regarding solicitation and advertisement practices by attorneys and/or other professionals. NLR does not accept advertising from attorneys or law firms. The National Law Review is not a law firm nor is www.NatLawReview.com  intended to be an advertisement or a referral service for attorneys and/or other professionals. The NLR does not wish, nor does it intend, to solicit the business of anyone or to refer anyone to an attorney or other professional.  NLR does not answer legal questions nor will we refer you to an attorney or other professional if you request such information from us. 

Under certain state laws the following statements may be required on this website and we have included them in order to be in full compliance with these rules. The choice of a lawyer or other professional is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements. Attorney Advertising Notice: Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Statement in compliance with Texas Rules of Professional Conduct. Unless otherwise noted, attorneys are not certified by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization, nor can NLR attest to the accuracy of any notation of Legal Specialization or other Professional Credentials.